Skip to comments.
How Massachusetts H.4121 Would Abolish The Second Amendment
Reality Always Wins ^
| 7/8/2014
| Youtube
Posted on 07/09/2014 4:55:11 AM PDT by RealityAlwaysWins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: RealityAlwaysWins
” SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED “
2
posted on
07/09/2014 5:04:52 AM PDT
by
Lionheartusa1
(-: 0bamanomics is the equal distribution of misery :-)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
This would be a clear violation of the Heller decision.
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is the well-armed lamb contesting the vote. Benjamin Franklin
4
posted on
07/09/2014 5:14:54 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
To: taxcontrol
“...This would be a clear violation of...”
They don’t care.
If they think they can remotely get away with it, they will try it.
If the citizenry doesn’t push back - hard - they will get away with it.
5
posted on
07/09/2014 5:15:57 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
CCW permits in CA are discretionary, but you don’t need a license to own a gun. Long guns and handguns do require registration. All firearms must be sold thru a dealer. CA is looking at permits to buy ammo.
6
posted on
07/09/2014 5:18:19 AM PDT
by
umgud
(I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
"What in bleeping Hell are you people doing?"
7
posted on
07/09/2014 5:18:36 AM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
With the 9th Circuit ruling in
Peruta v. San Diego saying that the state must allow either concealed carry or open carry and the 7th circuit ruling in
Moore V. Madigan that forced Illinois to adopt shall issue concealed carry, vs. the 3rd Circuit ruling in
Drake v. Filko where "justifiable need" was upheld, the entire issue is eventually going to wind up in the Supreme Court.
Let the Massachusetts legislature pass this law which will also be challenged all the way to the Supremes.
8
posted on
07/09/2014 5:23:01 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: umgud
Have been invited by my sister to move to California. Told her the chances of my doing that we’re about the same as Hell freezing over.
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.
To: NFHale
To: Lionheartusa1
They can issue as many laws and regulations as they want to. Doesn’t mean I will obey them. Welcome to the NWO where every citizen unit is turned into a criminal to be exploited for profit at the king’s request.
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Bad as this is it isn't anything that the
massholes don't deserve.
13
posted on
07/09/2014 5:50:43 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Whomever votes for this should be shot. This is what the second amendment is for.
14
posted on
07/09/2014 5:53:19 AM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: from occupied ga
strange. That video won’t play for me.
15
posted on
07/09/2014 6:25:16 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: longfellow
“Whomever votes for this should be shot. This is what the second amendment is for.”
Dead right! Liberals and the NRA think it is about “the sporting purposes of firearms”.
16
posted on
07/09/2014 6:38:56 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Arm Up! They Are!)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Constitutions Supremacy Clause and Bill of Rights trump state laws.
17
posted on
07/09/2014 6:41:55 AM PDT
by
Hulka
To: RealityAlwaysWins
I don’t want to break it to you, but this has been the case for years.
The local police chief “May” issue. It varies town to town. In the cities, you face a tougher battle. My town generally does not issue conceal carry, but I can own handguns.
I don’t agree with the “May” issue part of it. But that’s the way it is.
18
posted on
07/09/2014 6:48:18 AM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
To: Yo-Yo
mass does not care. There is no penalty for knowingly passing laws which can not stand and they know it. In their eyes all laws are 100% legal until a judge forces they to tweak it.
19
posted on
07/09/2014 7:01:25 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: RealityAlwaysWins
Hard to believe that the laws in MASS used to REQUIRE people to carry guns while on a journey and to church. But that was back in the day when you could be murdered real fast.
OH WAIT! The only difference is that back then the murderers would also scalp you!
20
posted on
07/09/2014 7:10:19 AM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson