Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2012 12:12:35 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: nickcarraway

Lesbians


2 posted on 12/03/2012 12:14:17 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Obama lied, Stevens died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

This cannot be true. They haven’t factored me into their comparison.


3 posted on 12/03/2012 12:15:25 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

it is called: “researching the competition.”


4 posted on 12/03/2012 12:15:45 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

ttiuwp


5 posted on 12/03/2012 12:17:28 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Working is for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

ROTFLOL


7 posted on 12/03/2012 12:18:50 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Fact is, women are jealous as sin of attractive women.

They aren't admiring them. They are hating on them.

9 posted on 12/03/2012 12:21:44 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Women look at other women more because they like to size up the competition. Hetero women don’t mind looking at or being touched by each other — quite unlike hetero men.

Also, women are more interesting to look at than men, aren’t they?


10 posted on 12/03/2012 12:21:44 PM PST by walford (http://natural-law-natural-religion.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I guess Van Morrison had it about right in Wild Nights:

The wild night is calling.
And all the girls walk by
Dressed up for each other...


11 posted on 12/03/2012 12:25:07 PM PST by Archytekt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Jealousy.


14 posted on 12/03/2012 12:27:12 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Proves what...if you see a picture of Kate Middleton and hubby......of course a woman looks at Kate....but with no sexual connotations,.....the lovely clothes, her grace, etc...

Most testing is geared to produce a specific answer. We're not idiots..

15 posted on 12/03/2012 12:30:23 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"This is counter-intuitive from a sexual perspective if you are thinking about desire"

Counterintuative from a Darwinian feminist perspective, but not from a rational conservative perspective. It all goes back to capitalistic desires - maximizing shareholder returns.

19 posted on 12/03/2012 12:41:17 PM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Young also women ogle themselves at every opportunity. If you mounted a mirror at street level on the side of a building in Manhattan, around 90% of the young women walking by would check themselves out. They wouldn’t use the mirror as a sly way to check out if any threats are walking behind them, they would just check out themselves.


20 posted on 12/03/2012 12:42:32 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Duhhhh, and they actually spent money on this?


21 posted on 12/03/2012 12:43:25 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

22 posted on 12/03/2012 12:45:19 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

But, women could blame THAT on men, too! Blame it on both President Bush’s and Reagan, too. “Men, and their guns.”


27 posted on 12/03/2012 12:52:46 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Damn, based on ogling women, I must be a woman!


28 posted on 12/03/2012 1:02:58 PM PST by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Poorly done study. The sharper men in the study probably figured out that this was some kind of sex test, and decided that the best way to get done with it is to spend equal amounts of time on each photo. Either that, or they wanted to get done quickly.

Also, not much description is made of the types of women in the pictures. Old, young? Fat, skinny? Shapely? Homely? Degree of clothing?

The women would be less confirmed with being called a pervert. And, if the pictures look like the pictures in a “Soft Surroundings” or “Tall girl” catalogue, might have been used in the same way that the catalogue is used, checking out the clothes, NOT the women per se.


30 posted on 12/03/2012 1:12:20 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pretty common in the canine world, it’s called “bitch aggression”.


31 posted on 12/03/2012 1:12:44 PM PST by dainbramaged (My dog can talk - when she feels like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I’ve often said that women wear makeup not for men but for other women. Now there is a study to back me up.


35 posted on 12/03/2012 1:23:39 PM PST by NonValueAdded (If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

36 posted on 12/03/2012 1:31:10 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson