Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romanian cave holds some of the oldest human footprints
Science News ^ | July 17, 2014 | Bruce Bower

Posted on 07/21/2014 9:29:57 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

About 400 footprints were first discovered in the cave in 1965. Scientists initially attributed the impressions to a man, woman and child who lived 10,000 to 15,000 years ago. But radiocarbon measurements of two cave bear bones excavated just below the footprints now indicate that Homo sapiens made these tracks around 36,500 years ago, say anthropologist David Webb of Kutztown University in Pennsylvania and his colleagues. Analyses of 51 footprints that remain — cave explorers and tourists have destroyed the rest — indicate that six or seven individuals, including at least one child, entered the cave after a flood had coated its floor with sandy mud, the researchers report July 7 in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Published ages for other H. sapiens footprints in Europe and elsewhere go back no more than 33,000 years. At a 2011 conference, scientists said that H. sapiens tracks at Tanzania’s Engare Sero site were 120,000 years old. Those findings have not been published yet, suggesting to Webb a problem with dating or footprint authenticity. Nearly 1-million-year-old footprints of modern human ancestors were recently documented at a British site.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: engaresero; footprints; godsgravesglyphs; paleontology; romania; tanzania; trackway; trackways
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Portcall24

The question I have is whether the bear bones show these bare-footed folks were contesting ownership of the cave with cave bears—and winning.


21 posted on 07/21/2014 11:25:45 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

Before RC dating, stratigraphy was used exclusively. Since the bear bones were immediately below, using RC dating on the bones dates the strata in which they’re found, and the millimeters of debris on top of them is likely to have accumulated in a short period of time — not the over 10000 years that represents the difference between the old estimate and this RC date.


22 posted on 07/22/2014 4:02:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

OK. So they dated the bones located under the footprint. Why couldn’t the bones have been there for thousands of years before someone stepped into the debris. Thanks for your help and patience.


23 posted on 07/22/2014 4:46:36 PM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

I explained that already, and I’m done with it.


24 posted on 07/22/2014 5:01:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson