Posted on 02/16/2024 10:34:30 AM PST by Red Badger
Dr Valentina Rossi of University College Cork, Ireland, who led the research team which discovered that a 280-million-year-old lizard fossil is, in part, a forgery. (Image credit: Zixiao Yang)
A 280-million-year-old fossil that has baffled researchers for decades has been shown to be, in part, a forgery following new examination of the remnants.
The discovery has led the team led by Dr Valentina Rossi of University College Cork, Ireland (UCC) to urge caution in how the fossil is used in future research.
Tridentinosaurus antiquus was discovered in the Italian alps in 1931 and was thought to be an important specimen for understanding early reptile evolution.
Its body outline, appearing dark against the surrounding rock, was initially interpreted as preserved soft tissues. This led to its classification as a member of the reptile group Protorosauria.
However, this new research, published in the scientific journal Palaeontology, reveals that the fossil renowned for its remarkable preservation is mostly just black paint on a carved lizard-shaped rock surface.
The purported fossilised skin had been celebrated in articles and books but never studied in detail. The somewhat strange preservation of the fossil had left many experts uncertain about what group of reptiles this strange lizard-like animal belonged to and more generally its geological history.
Dr Rossi, of UCC’s School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, said:
“Fossil soft tissues are rare, but when found in a fossil they can reveal important biological information, for instance, the external colouration, internal anatomy and physiology.
“The answer to all our questions was right in front of us, we had to study this fossil specimen in details to reveal its secrets – even those that perhaps we did not want to know”.
The microscopic analysis showed that the texture and composition of the material did not match that of genuine fossilised soft tissues.
Preliminary investigation using UV photography revealed that the entirety of the specimen was treated with some sort of coating material. Coating fossils with varnishes and/or lacquers was the norm in the past and sometimes is still necessary to preserve a fossil specimen in museum cabinets and exhibits. The team was hoping that beneath the coating layer, the original soft tissues were still in good condition to extract meaningful palaeobiological information.
The findings indicate that the body outline of Tridentinosaurus antiquus was artificially created, likely to enhance the appearance of the fossil. This deception misled previous researchers, and now caution is being urged when using this specimen in future studies.
The team behind this research includes contributors based in Italy at the University of Padua, Museum of Nature South Tyrol, and the Museo delle Scienze in Trento
Co-author Prof Evelyn Kustatscher, coordinator of the project “Living with the supervolcano”, funded by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano said:
“The peculiar preservation of Tridentinosaurus had puzzled experts for decades. Now, it all makes sense. What it was described as carbonized skin, is just paint”.
However all not all is lost, and the fossil is not a complete fake. The bones of the hindlimbs, in particular, the femurs seem genuine, although poorly preserved. Moreover, the new analyses have shown the presence of tiny bony scales called osteoderms - like the scales of crocodiles - on what perhaps was the back of the animal.
This study is an example of how modern analytical palaeontology and rigorous scientific methods can resolve an almost century-old palaeontological enigma.
Not sure it isn’t genuine - it does bear a startling resemblance to Nanzi Pelosi...
Can’t always tell or be sure these days.........................
Guzzis or Ducatis?
“Wonder how many others there are still out there?”
Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are two. But neither one of them is going to be investigated.
wy69
6000 yr old earth and a world wide never again to be experienced flood killed all but a remnant of life and spawned the robust fossil record of some animals.
Think so?
You might want to have a chat, then, with whomever is in charge of infection control at your local hospital. :-)
I’m not sure. Didn’t follow GP racing that much. Just knew Valentino was very fast.
.
I was sticking with the Italian flavors.
Endogenous retro viruses clearly demonstrate that humans and chimps had a common ancestor that was neither human nor chimp. To deny that requires one to deny the entire basis for modern genetics science.
You’re, of course free to do that if you so choose.
Always a good choice.
Yup.
The fact that they are perpetrating these frauds shows that they KNOW that the ToE is not legitimate but they are trying to prop it up as much as they can by outright deliberately deceiving people.
Truth doesn’t need deceit to prove it is true.
Yep right from the Pelosi family tree.
You said it.
That's some irrational rationalization right there.
Oh really?
How so?
Explain to me what other reason there is for deliberate fraud of that degree. That was no accident. It was deliberately done and meticulously executed.
The old adaptation is the same as a new species fraud.
Proof. Show the transitory fossils between chimp and man. We all know you cannot. You guys have only been looking for that fossil for nearly 200 years and zero proof.
[snip] However all not all is lost, and the fossil is not a complete fake. The bones of the hindlimbs, in particular, the femurs seem genuine, although poorly preserved. Moreover, the new analyses have shown the presence of tiny bony scales called osteoderms - like the scales of crocodiles - on what perhaps was the back of the animal.
This study is an example of how modern analytical palaeontology and rigorous scientific methods can resolve an almost century-old palaeontological enigma. [/snip]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
