Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to speak at 11:15 EDT (O'Connor)

Posted on 07/01/2005 8:01:28 AM PDT by cll

Per Foxnews.com banner


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; sandradayoconnor; scotus; statement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181 next last
To: anniegetyourgun

Why did O'Conner resign?


101 posted on 07/01/2005 9:06:25 AM PDT by oceanperch (Oregon Coast Rocks. Pride of the Pacific Northwest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Please, read again my last post here. I wrote "moderately" to mean the contrary... Bye, my friend

I didn't understand your original post, either. Here is what you wrote:

He is "moderately" pro-life... id est he admits ABORTION!

I had to look up "id est" to see if it's a Latin term. I found out that it means "that is," but what does "that is he admits abortion" mean? I think your post is unclear.

102 posted on 07/01/2005 9:08:30 AM PDT by cantfindagoodscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: All

Rush on live and hopping!


103 posted on 07/01/2005 9:08:49 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cantfindagoodscreenname

Ok, I re-write my opinion: Gonzo is NOT pro-life, because he would admit abortion in many cases. Anyway, it's not so uncommon to find people saying that we could be "moderately" pro-life, that is sometimes pro-abortion... For me there is only this alternative: pro-life or not, pro-abortion or against. That's all.


104 posted on 07/01/2005 9:13:49 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
There are more than 3-5 RINO's

The problem is much bigger than RINOs.

Associate Justices and US Senators are both drawn from the same class.

The values of that class (the values of most of its members) are incompatible with ordered Liberty and a constitutional republic, since both require self-reliant and self-disciplined citizens.

The managerial elite wants neither.

How many US Senators want to be put on the spot by a reversal of Roe v. Wade?

I venture to guess that it's less than 30.

So it is with all of the "social issues". The class interests and class prejudices of Senators (especially Republicans) are at odds with those of the common people.

This being so, it is very much in the interest of a large bipartisan majority to have these "social issues" referred to a forum which is unreviewable and whose members are not subject to losing their jobs by failure to be reelected.

It will take a President with a very clear Constitutional vision and a large Senate majority to fix this problem.

105 posted on 07/01/2005 9:15:39 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lx

NONE! Just give me a headsup. I work in Seattle and all that mass of exploding flesh and guts will splatter this entire office. I want to be in a waterproof suit with face gear on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


106 posted on 07/01/2005 9:17:52 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Two books, the Koran and Mein Kampf, advocate violence, murder and hate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

Rush is right today: replacing one lawyer, a liberal Supreme Court justice, with another lawyer will change very little, even if the new judge is a real conservative.


107 posted on 07/01/2005 9:23:25 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

I have to admit I never even thought of that idea. But what about the name. I had to look him up because I thought you were pulling my leg. Well, his record from the website looks pretty good. Is there somebody good in Idaho to replace him? I would hate to lose the next election because we appointed a weak candidate.


108 posted on 07/01/2005 9:25:57 AM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch

Ill spouse....and she's wanted to retire for the last 4 years.


109 posted on 07/01/2005 9:26:52 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Ok, I re-write my opinion: Gonzo is NOT pro-life, because he would admit abortion in many cases. Anyway, it's not so uncommon to find people saying that we could be "moderately" pro-life, that is sometimes pro-abortion... For me there is only this alternative: pro-life or not, pro-abortion or against. That's all.

Thanks for clarifying. I understand now what you are saying. I haven't followed this guy's positions, so I didn't know that he believes abortion is OK in certain situations. Do you happen to know when he thinks abortion is OK? Is it the fuzzy "health of the mother" situation or is he an "it's OK in cases of rape and incest" person? In my opinion, the first view is horrible because abortion will be permitted in all situations, but if he believes in abortion in cases of rape and incest, at least that reduces the number of abortions dramatically if it becomes law. I don't believe in abortion in cases of rape and incest, but it's certainly better than what we have now.

110 posted on 07/01/2005 9:27:01 AM PDT by cantfindagoodscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

If it was ethinic preferences, he has Garza and Estrada to choose from.


111 posted on 07/01/2005 9:29:24 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: daviscupper

I think the junior senator from Idaho pronounces his name "cray-poe." So that doesn't sound so bad. ;-)

Another senator Reid suggested as a justice is Lindsey Graham. Maybe it would be a good idea to get him out of the Senate!

Btw, does anyone know where I can find the roll call votes on Supreme Court confirmations? I would be interested in knowing which handful of senators had the good sense to vote NO on Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer.


112 posted on 07/01/2005 9:33:42 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Rush is right today

I do not always get to listen to him, but when I do, I find he usually is right. ;*)

113 posted on 07/01/2005 9:40:14 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
whats wrong with Gonzalez?

He's not a conservative.

114 posted on 07/01/2005 9:41:33 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
He's not a conservative.

I just did some research on him, I agree we deserve a better Judge than him on the Supreme Court.

115 posted on 07/01/2005 9:43:23 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

Do you want to know? All senators who voted against Souter were Democrats, including Kerry, EMK, Mikulski, Terry Sanford, Brock Adams, Bradley, Lautenberg, and Quentin Burdick of ND.

The American Conservative Union endorsed Souter. All Republican senators voted for him, including Helms and Nickles, then the two most conservative senators. Pete Wilson though was apparently absent from the vote.


116 posted on 07/01/2005 9:45:45 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: cll

"Time to go nukulear and be done with it."

Great line! Well stated.


117 posted on 07/01/2005 9:45:48 AM PDT by W1_hooyah (I actually did vote for John Kerry, right before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Roger that. I'd like to see Janice Rogers Brown sent up.


118 posted on 07/01/2005 9:46:23 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

any of the filibustered would probably be good. :D Estrada, Brown or the rest.


119 posted on 07/01/2005 9:47:49 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Geez - wha' happened - did Souter fool everyone, or was the homework not done? Or did the Left threaten to out him and he capitulated to their whims for life?


120 posted on 07/01/2005 9:48:32 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson