Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm more upset with Conservatives than I am with George W. Bush

Posted on 05/08/2006 7:04:26 PM PDT by mwfsu84

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,201-1,204 next last
To: inquest

But do you have the votes? Do you really have enough "pure" conservatives out there who are just waiting for their knight to appear? Last year Bush tried to reform social security, but the public said, NO. There are too many middle-class conservatives who have planned their retirement on a government pension. There are too many "conservatives" who want their own bridge to nowhere. There are too many who grumble about the tax code but don't want their favoite loophole closed. So, do you have the votes?


81 posted on 05/08/2006 7:23:42 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

I better be on that list at least twice, I worked hard to get on it.


82 posted on 05/08/2006 7:24:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
I hope you would RATHER try to work to get a conservative elected within the established party.

It's certainly possible to do both. In fact, the threat of a third party defection can provide an incentive to choose conservatives in the primaries.

83 posted on 05/08/2006 7:24:20 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mwfsu84
Well stated. But unfortunately you're preaching to a lot of folks here whose only issues are abortion, homosexuality, creationism or demanding Bush round up 20 million illegal Latinos within the next two to three weeks. Anything outside of that, like the war on terror takes a very distant back seat. Some voted for Bush, not because he was eminently more effective at protecting the country than any of his opponents, but because they believed he could get the gay marriage ban amendment passed. Since he will not get that accomplished, they have already written him off in favor of Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid.
84 posted on 05/08/2006 7:24:25 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

"It's all about the Mexicans!!!"

LOL. Not me. It is all about big arrogant government (at all levels).


85 posted on 05/08/2006 7:24:36 PM PDT by Stew Padasso ("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
You people are crazy. I just want to remember who will be responsible if the Democrats take over.

You don't even see the irony in your post.

87 posted on 05/08/2006 7:24:58 PM PDT by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; al_again
The list of Democrat supporters. You're on it, too.

So refusing to abandon one's conscience, ethos, and integrity is now on a par with 'supporting Democrats'?
Put me on your little list too. It would bring me the utmost pleasure to be segregated from Republican kowtowers.


"If I could not go to Heaven but with a party,
I would not go there at all"

88 posted on 05/08/2006 7:25:01 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
If the GOP knows they'll get conservative votes no matter what, then it is only incentivized to move leftward in an effort to get 'centrist' votes.

Logic has no place in this debate.

89 posted on 05/08/2006 7:25:26 PM PDT by stands2reason ("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mwfsu84

Well said...and thanks for posting that....


90 posted on 05/08/2006 7:25:32 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyr
When kids do not act the way you wish them to one doesn't reward them. One punishes them.

Says a noob who's been here all of four days.

Talk about kids. You're still in diapers.

I smell somethin'.

91 posted on 05/08/2006 7:25:58 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: All
Rationality rules here obviously. I can't wait to see the whining then. I don't agree with every conservative or with the President all the time but I'm certainly not going to pull my gun out and shoot myself in the foot because my head hurts. Third party vote? P***ing in the wind. Staying home? There's a person with conviction. It sounds like if it isn't easy, to hell with it. Sometimes you have to work with people of all types and accomplish the best that you can. If not, take your toys and go home. Maybe mommy will give you a sugar-tit and a blankie. We elected a President, not a dictator and even he is constrained to do the best he can with what he's got. Crippling him some more with a dem congress will certainly get all of you nay-sayers what you want.

I will vote REPUBLICAN and work as hard as I can to make sure the REPUBLICAN agenda moves forward with as much progress as possible.

Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill
92 posted on 05/08/2006 7:26:19 PM PDT by Houston_Texans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunnyD1182

The point of this post is, as disappointed as you are with Bush, it could get a lot worse with the party of Howard Dean.

In the last year, we've had Dick Durbin compare our soldier in Gtmo to Nazis. We've had an entire glee club that chattters joyfully every time something goes wrong in Iraq. Now we'll allow these people to control a major branch of our government.

No Republican president has ever governed strictly by Republican principles. Ronald Reagan in his last term RASIED taxes. Know why? Because a Democratic House forced him to.


93 posted on 05/08/2006 7:26:20 PM PDT by mwfsu84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mwfsu84
Define "conservatism".
94 posted on 05/08/2006 7:26:23 PM PDT by manwiththehands (No, usted no puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Well. Perot was right about NAFTA.

Really? If all the jobs were being "sucked to Mexico" how come all the Mexicans are coming here to work?

Ross Perot followers are the natural audience for Infomercials.

95 posted on 05/08/2006 7:26:51 PM PDT by Ditto (People who fail to secure jobs as fence posts go into journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mwfsu84
If it is down to between R and D, and you don't vote R, something is wrong inside your head.

That said, how you vote and you poll (etc) are different things. By admitting that you will always support R no matter what they do, you give no incentive for them to change course. Put their feet to the fire, make them afraid of losing your vote. Otherwise, if they think everything is safe within their traditional strongholds, their policies will branch out towards the mushy populist middle to "widen the margin". If there is no doubt that they will retain your support, this always happens. Scare the Republicans in the polls, but don't vote the dems into office (by staying home or otherwise).

Or just settle for the same old.

96 posted on 05/08/2006 7:27:04 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I smell somethin'.

They sure are bold lately.

97 posted on 05/08/2006 7:27:05 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: inquest
In fact, the threat of a third party defection can provide an incentive to choose conservatives in the primaries.

LOL!

RINO DeWine just got 74% of the vote against a good conservative challenger in the Ohio Republican senatorial primary.

98 posted on 05/08/2006 7:27:10 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Goldberry

Had enough?

Enough of prosperity, security and tax cuts?

Or what?


99 posted on 05/08/2006 7:27:31 PM PDT by altura (Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inquest

or, in some cases, it could lock up support for the other guys....

I'm talking close races here, not your basic Senate Race, like say, Ohio, where I'm sure Mike DeWhiner will open up to a 10% win when it's all said and done...

60% is better than 0% although 100% is the goal.

It would help if virtual nobodies wouldn't be the primary contenders against the types like Mike DeWhiner....


100 posted on 05/08/2006 7:27:39 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,201-1,204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson