Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HELP WANTED: RIGHTY FOR '08
NY Post ^ | January 8, 2007 | DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Posted on 01/08/2007 2:57:30 PM PST by chartnah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: kots

I'll give him a chance, just not McCain and Giuliani. But Buchanan said tonight (take it for what it's worth) that some stuff from the 90's will come back to haunt him. I guess he was pretty liberal. I'll wait to hear what he has to say.


41 posted on 01/08/2007 3:30:16 PM PST by UWconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
So just what is Morris anyway?

He's the biggest cootie I ever saw.

42 posted on 01/08/2007 3:31:08 PM PST by bad company ([link:www.truthout.org/docs_2006/083006J.shtml | The Path to 9/11])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chartnah

What about JC Watts?


43 posted on 01/08/2007 3:34:02 PM PST by Veggie Todd (Were those magic grits?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chartnah
The problem is that under Bush, the social conservatives have come to feel that they are the sole voice of the party and won't tolerate anyone whom they can't nominate. And yes, they have become arrogant.

Tancredo/Hunter

And delusional, apparently.

44 posted on 01/08/2007 3:35:19 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nitzy
I can't think of a time when I have felt so pessimistic. We had such high hopes for the future in 1994, it was just a matter of getting a conservative president and both the house and senate. Well, we had that for six years and our group decided to become democrats, and now they can't wait to suck up and hope that the media will ignore them so that they can go back to enjoying the perks of elected office without any of the responsibilities.

I'm so disgusted. Today, Rush told how the "repukes" are lining up to support democrats and their first 100 hours of legislation. With the same old leadership in place nothing will change except for the worst.

45 posted on 01/08/2007 3:36:42 PM PST by CremeSaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: chartnah

Welcome to FR.
Ya might want to check to see if an article has already been posted before you post it.:-]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1764087/posts


46 posted on 01/08/2007 3:44:07 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Sorry - I missed it, er, obviously. I'll be more diligent.


47 posted on 01/08/2007 3:46:29 PM PST by chartnah (If you come to a fork in the road, take it. - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kots

"Of course, some conservatives may support 3rd party candidate who gets 6% of votes thereby helping Hillary to win. If they are happy with that, so be it."

A couple of prominent 3rd party candidates often discussed on FR were Pat Buchanan (0.5%) and Harry Browne.

They both wound up opposing most of the War on Terror, turned out to Blame America First.

But they got a lot of coverage on FR, where so called principles trump pragmatism.


48 posted on 01/08/2007 3:47:26 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chartnah

no problemo...just thought I'd give you a heads up before one of the self appointed "room monitors" give you a nasty reprimand. LOL


49 posted on 01/08/2007 3:51:43 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL; All
Jeff Sessions or Duncan Hunter... Waiting to hear more on Hunter on illegals. Jeff Sessions has the best record on illegals I have seen proven in action.

Sessions hasn't made any noise about running. Hunter has announced. Sessions was great in the last session of the senate on the immigration bill, but Hunters 20plus year record on immigration and border control hasn't been beaten by anything I've seen.

Check it out.

http://www.house.gov/hunter/border1.html

Congressman Duncan Hunter's Efforts to Secure the U.S. Border

December 15, 2005: Congressman Hunter successfully adds an amendment to H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Alien Control Act of 2005, mandating that 698 miles of border fencing be erected in five strategic locations along our nation's Southern border with Mexico. The Hunter Amendment passed the House by a vote of 260-159.

October 6, 2005: House passes H.R. 2360, the FY 2006 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, which appropriates $35 million for completion of the San Diego Border Fence.

September, 14, 2005: Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff announces that he will exercise the authority granted to him under the REAL ID Act and require the completion of the San Diego Border Fence.

(snip)

May 12, 1999: The Clinton-Gore Administration revealed that, despite a congressional mandate and the funding to hire 1,000 additional Border Patrol agents for fiscal year 1999, only 200 will actually be hired. Congressman Hunter is joined by Reps. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), Henry Bonilla (R-TX) and Lamar Smith (R-TX) as well as Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and Phil Gramm (R-TX) at a news conference to announce they will send a letter to the President. Click here to read the press release. Of the 1,000 agents that were supposed to be deployed, 78 were to be stationed at the El Centro Sector of Imperial County --- now the sector may not receive any. The administration does not plan to deploy new agents in San Diego County.

The letter, signed by more than 50 Democrat and Republican Members of Congress, expressed "deep disappointment at the continuing lack of compliance with the congressional mandate to increase the Border Patrol by 1,000 agents per year. Meanwhile, cross-border drug smuggling and alien smuggling continue to cost uncounted lives and damages each year, and terrorists may enter the United States at any time. Additional Border Patrol agents are needed to achieve control in California and Texas, to stop the emerging crisis in Arizona and New Mexico, to combat smuggling along the Florida and Gulf coasts, and to shore up the severely undermanned northern border from New England and New York through the Midwest to Washington state. All this territory is presently covered by only 8,000 Border Patrol agents, a force less than half the size of the Chicago Police Department. "Experts within your own administration, such as drug czar Barry McCaffrey, and in academia estimate that at least 20,000 Border Patrol agents are needed to control drug smuggling, alien smuggling, and terrorism. Yet there is no indication that your border strategy recognizes the emergency situation caused by low Border Patrol recruitment and high attrition or is animated by any sense of urgency. The past three months have seen significant deterioration, not improvement, in border security."

February 17, 1999: Despite record apprehension levels and many months of Congressman Hunter calling for hundreds of new Border Patrol agents for Imperial County, the INS announces it will only send 78 agents to the area. There are now approximately 400 Border Patrol agents in Imperial County. As Congressman Hunter has stressed to the INS, the County is second in total apprehensions of illegal immigrants but second to last in border enforcement resources. September 28, 1998: Funding for Fiscal Year 1999 national defense programs gained final House approval. A measure in the bill will add $3 million for the National Guard's continued construction of the border fence and roads in eastern San Diego County. CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

50 posted on 01/08/2007 3:54:58 PM PST by WatchingInAmazement (President DUNCAN HUNTER 2008! http://www.house.gov/hunter/border1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

:) I can do nasty, too, when things get unreasonable, but I don't go looking for it, LOL.

BTW, I'm curious why we haven't seen names like:
Gen Tommy Franks
Gen Russel Honore ("Stuck on stupid")
LTC Erik Kurilla (Deuce Four)

They can "stand inpsection", methinks...


51 posted on 01/08/2007 3:56:32 PM PST by chartnah (If you come to a fork in the road, take it. - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chartnah

The way things are shaping is so maddening. Historically I've never remotely had a problem with the ultimate Republican nominee, since I started voting, more than two decades ago. They've always met my political requirements, and I've fully supported them, each and every time (never was swayed by Perot, Buchanan, etc.). I don't expect to agree 100% all the time with the Rep nominee, of course, but I always have had a few trip-wires. Things I really never expected a potential Republican presidential candidate 'not' to share.

A tiny handful of requirements, such as being pro- death penalty, being a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendmendment, and have an apparently decent family life. Those have always been imperatives. To this I've recently added the strong necessity of being anti-amnesty and enforcing our borders. I've been horrified beyond belief at Bush on this matter, propelling it into a completely predominant and non-negotiable issue for me.

If the Republican nominee doesn't meet these requirements, I'm not going to vote for him. That's a promise. And, it will be the first time in my life the Republican won't get my support. As things are shaping up now, with the current frontrunners, things are looking rather alarming, and I can't deny I'm rather aghast and flummoxed by it all. Like I said, I've always voted exclusively for Republicans in each and every election, big and small, and the prospect that the next nominee to come down the pike will be entirely unacceptable to me just leaves me dumbfounded.


52 posted on 01/08/2007 4:00:32 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kots
Listen Romney for a while

Already know his position on the 2nd amendment.

53 posted on 01/08/2007 4:01:22 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: zarf

FR is irrelevent for the 08 election cycle; itll be a litany of whining about the lack of true believers running.




You said it....it'll be Rudy ...Romney or McCaine.

Good thing too ......cuz some unknown like Hunter or Huckabee would get their asses kicked by the dims in 08


54 posted on 01/08/2007 4:06:05 PM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Dick Morris wants the most unelectable Republican possible. He is a Clinton loyalist, always and forever.

You have got to be kidding! He's written three books in a row debunking Hillary! She wrote "Living History" he wrote "Re-writing History" to correct the many lies in the book. He then wrote a book about the need for Condi to run to counter Hillary. He then wrote a book that was all lies, rude comments and ugly slurs from Hillary called "I've always been a Yankees Fan" that has a picture of her in a Cubs hat on the cover.

There are a lot of things to dislike about Morris, but one thing you can say for sure. He HATES Hillary. Not sure why, where or when it developed, but it's a strong hatred.

55 posted on 01/08/2007 4:24:44 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
Good thing too ......cuz some unknown like Hunter or Huckabee would get their asses kicked by the dims in 08

Face it. It is an uphill struggle for whoever the "R" is in 08. Especially if Iraq remains unfinished.

As for Hunter or Huckabee they may be unknown now but surely would not be if they manage to win the Republican nomination. Kerry was very well known. Gore was V.P. Didn't help them.

Bill Clinton had the same job that unknown Huckabee has today: Gov. of Arkansas. Seemed to be no impediment to him winning the nomination and presidency twice.

Why is this, then, an impossible position for Huckabee?

I probably agree that Duncan Hunter won't win the nomination. No Representative has since before WWII.

56 posted on 01/08/2007 4:40:25 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd
I think you are right about JC. Here's another scenario for consideration (understand I did not come up with this myself but read it elsewhere, just can't remember where):

Hillary/Obama will be the D ticket. The only way to beat that combo is with another male/female team and/or another black/white team. Or maybe a Southerner. So here's what I've heard elsewhere.

Cheney will eventually resign as V.P., Condi will be appointed to replace him as V.P. When '08 comes along, she will run for President, picking the Governor of S.C. as her running mate. That combo will beat Hill-O.

Dick Morris is and always has been a personal friend of the Clintons. Even though he is badmouthing her he still comes out on her side when the chips are down. He is a Democratic strategist and he (last I heard) is married to Mary Maitland (spelling?), who is a Republican strategist. Go figure.
57 posted on 01/08/2007 4:42:30 PM PST by bogie7129 (Truth...the Words in Red ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: UWconservative
I think you summed it up nicely.
58 posted on 01/08/2007 4:43:12 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bogie7129

Ummmm......Morris is married to Eileen Morgan, the co-author of this and other articles. Mary M. is married to Carvell (sp)?


59 posted on 01/08/2007 4:54:08 PM PST by CAluvdubya (What's so hard to understand about the word illegal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Oops, Eileen McGahn (don't know what I was typing!)


60 posted on 01/08/2007 4:55:04 PM PST by CAluvdubya (What's so hard to understand about the word illegal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson