Skip to comments.Find Of Roman Coins Shows Ancient Britons In A New Light
Posted on 02/25/2007 6:07:08 PM PST by blam
Find of Roman coin shows ancient Britons in a new light
By Daily Telegraph Reporter
Last Updated: 1:34am GMT 26/02/2007
Experts are excited about a rare coin unearthed by an amateur treasure hunter which could change the accepted ancient history of Britain.
The silver denarius which dates back to the Roman Republic before Julius Caesar made Rome an empire was unearthed near Fowey in Cornwall.
Dating from 146 BC, it shows how ancient Britons were trading with the Romans well before the country was conquered in AD 43.
"It proves that there was a lot more going on between the continent and ourselves," said Anna Tyacke, Finds Liaison Officer at the Royal Cornwall Museum.
Cornwall had trade significance because of the tin and copper it produced, but that economic activity is not well documented before the third century AD.
Coins were relatively rare, of high value and often stayed in circulation for more than 100 years which makes dating the find harder.
Sam Moorhead, Finds Adviser of Iron Age and Roman coins at the British Museum, said: "It may have been the wages of a Roman legionnaire, who earned about 300 denarii a year in the Roman imperial period after the conquest.
"You could probably have got about eight loaves of bread for a coin like this, or eight litres of wine.
"Vineyard labourers would have earned between a half and one denarius a day. Whereas to be a senator you had to have at least 250,000 denarii in the bank."
The silver coin was minted in Rome and carries the likeness of Roma wearing a winged helmet, plus the name of a Caius Antestius, its maker.
"Roma is a personification of Rome, rather like Britannia is a personification of Britain," Mr Moorhead explained.
The reverse of the coin carries a picture on horseback of the mythological twins Castor and Pollux, who were believed to have helped the Romans in battle.
It proves that one coin made it to the island.
Could have been from a Roman who was a coin collector.In which case the dating had better come from something other than the coin!
Are there pics?
If the coin is stamped 146 B.C., it's probably a fake.
Not yet. They'll probably turn up tomorrow on the archaeological sites.
The Pheonicians were trading in Cornwall centuries before the Romans. What's the big deal?
It shows nothing of the sort. It only shows that Roman coins had made it to Briton. Coins are coins, a medium of exchange. Somebody who traded with Romans, in turn traded with somebody, and the end of the chain winds up in Briton
Or recon for Marklar.
Not so shocking.
Caesar says the Gauls had ships with no oars that dwarfed their triremes.
Dating from 146 BC, it shows how ancient Britons were trading with the Romans well before the country was conquered in AD 43... Cornwall had trade significance because of the tin and copper it produced, but that economic activity is not well documented before the third century AD. Coins were relatively rare, of high value and often stayed in circulation for more than 100 years which makes dating the find harder.To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
The date is from the name of the official (monetal or moneyer) C. Antestius. T.R.S. Broughton's Magistrates of the Roman Republic puts him between 137 and 134 B.C., but that work was published in 1952, and perhaps new information has come out since then to show that he was actually in office in 146 B.C.
It further shows that Rome used diplomacy and made deals with foreign leaders whenever possible. Propaganda and diplomacy have been emphasized in Latin culture throughout recorded history. Recent UK columns are a more contemporary example of the same.
***If the coin is stamped 146 B.C., it's probably a fake. ***
It's legit if it's BCE.;-)
|Gods, Graves, Glyphs ping list|
|· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·|
The Romans in Ireland
Archaeology Today | 2000? | L.A. Curchin
Posted on 07/18/2004 11:54:58 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
It may prove that Romans from a later period carried old coins.
In Brian Sykes book, "Saxons, Vikings And Celts", he thinks he's found a small DNA group that he believes could relate to the Roman occupation.
maybe someone lost his change on the way back from the takeaway:
Boadicea May Have Had Her Chips On Site Of McDonald's
The Telegraph (UK) | 5-25-2006 | Nick Britten
Posted on 05/24/2006 11:59:01 PM EDT by blam
Romans went to war on diet of pizza, dig shows.
The Scotsman | Mon 26 Aug 2002 | John Innes
Posted on 08/26/2002 5:20:42 PM EDT by vannrox
So How Far Did The Phoenicians Really Go In The Region?
Daily Star | 2-23-2004 | Peter Speetjens
Posted on 02/23/2004 8:55:51 AM PST by blam
and in the east:
Roman relics found near Elephanta
Daily News & Analysis | Friday, September 15, 2006 | Ninad D Sheth
Posted on 09/15/2006 3:58:33 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
INTAMM | 1997 | Xavier S. Thani Nayagam
Posted on 09/11/2004 8:07:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Archaeologists Uncover Ancient Maritime Spice Route Between India, Egypt
Popular Science | 2-8-2004
Posted on 02/08/2004 3:57:17 PM EST by blam
The History: Thalia, the Internet Classics Archive | 440 B.C. | Herodotus, tr by George Rawlinson
Posted on 09/09/2004 10:31:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
The Voyage around the Erythraean Sea
Silk Road | 2004 | William H. Schoff
Posted on 09/12/2004 10:55:44 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
Eusebius' Onomasticon: Geographical Knowledge in Byzantine Palestine
Palestine Exploration Fund | 17 March, 2004, Last modified 30 April, 2004 | Joan E. Taylor and Rupert L. Chapman
Posted on 01/01/2005 4:36:08 AM EST by SunkenCiv
The historian Tacitus was his son-in-law which is why we know a lot about him.
Lucca's Roman past revealed
ANSA | March 30 2006
Posted on 03/30/2006 12:34:39 PM EST by SunkenCiv
"Archaeologists have unearthed evidence of a Roman presence long before the traditonal date of Roman settlement in 180 BCE - corroborating Roman historian Livy's account of the great Carthaginian general Hannibal passing through Lucca in 217 BCE... The discovery came after other finds last year which highlighted how Lucca thrived because of its strategic position on the main road that led towards Gaul."
Phoenician Tombs Found In Sicily
ANSA | 8-23-2006
Posted on 08/23/2006 9:12:18 PM EDT by blam
"Roman statesman and soldier, born in Fréjus (formerly Forum Julii). Having served with distinction in Britain, Asia, and Aquitania, he was elected consul in 77, and returned to Britain (7884) becoming Rome's longest-serving and most successful governor there. In 80 and 81 he extended Roman occupation N into Scotland, defeated Calcagus at Mons Graupius (84), and actively encouraged the development of Roman-style towns in the S. His fleet circumnavigated the coast, for the first time discovering Britain to be an island. The news of Agricola's successes inflamed the jealousy of the emperor, Domitian, and in 84 he was recalled."
If viewed in terms of today's minimum wage, that would mean senators would have to own several million dollars.
C Antestius, AR Denarius, 146 BC, Rome
C . ANTESTI (ANTE ligate)
Head of Roma right, wearing winged helmet, X below chin
The Dioscuri galloping right, dog running right below horses
ROMA in exergue
18mm x 20mm, 4.05g
Antestia 1; Cr 219/1e; Syd 411
"Could have been from a Roman who was a coin collector.In which case the dating had better come from something other than the coin!"
You fools. The article states the coin has the date 146BC stamped right on it!
Maybe the money was backdated to avoid the Roman IRS... ;-)
one time bump, additional info:
Would be nice to have in a collection.
Does it really?
Those are gorgeous. That Roma shore looks a whole lot better than that cleopatra coin.
"Greetings, Marklar! I am Marklar! This is Marklar."
Of course the Brits of then weren't the Brits of now. The Normans had not yet invaded and settled, nor had the Saxons, nor the Angles, the Danes, the Jutes, the Vikings and all the rest that make up the modern Brit. Celts and Picts were the ones the Romans and Phoenicians were dealing with.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
Bronze Age Forum
Excerpt, or Link only?
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.