Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Prediction if the Fairtax is passed

Posted on 09/22/2007 7:18:53 PM PDT by netvictory

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: PugetSoundSoldier
Every single business now has a NEW BURDEN of being a sales tax collector for the federal government.

Businesses already do... Try not collecting FICA or SS for your employees, and not turning in W2s...

Since the Fair Tax is a sales tax charged at retail, the correct comparrison is on the sales taxes currently in place.

All retail establishments are already tax collectors for a sales tax.

121 posted on 09/24/2007 8:45:39 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; kingu
Congress is faced with an incredible flood of cash, the largest they've ever had, as the ill thought out FairTax rate proves to far exceed government expenditures, leading to even more socialization with a New New Deal supporting liberals to one of the largest landslides in election history as people throw out the people who brought this inanely huge tax rate onto every purchase, everywhere.

This is the first I have heard this argument. All the other detractors claim that the 23% NRST rate is far to low to meet current revenue and it would have to be much higher.

I guess we could actually lower it!

122 posted on 09/24/2007 8:47:42 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nvcdl
All the retirees living on savings will love paying taxes when they spend their already taxed nestegg.

They are already are, its just hidden.

123 posted on 09/24/2007 8:49:05 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Soft drink companies raised the price of a soft drink exponentially, including artificially sweetened drinks. When sugar prices returned to normal, guess what, soft drinks stayed at their high levels.

The 70's is a bit far back for my memory to go on prices. But I remember the early 80's and a 2 liter bottle of coke was 99 cents. I can buy it for 99 cents today as well.

124 posted on 09/24/2007 8:52:50 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The prebate ALONE is a communist agenda item. A prebate to each according to their needs, a prebate taken from each according to their abilities.

This makes no sense. Being that the prebate is the same for each person, regardless of age or income, how can your above statement be true?

125 posted on 09/24/2007 8:54:38 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
How is it possible by now you don't understand people will not be paying taxes on income because the Fair tax will shift tax collection from income to consumption? Everyone will be paying taxes under The Fair Tax when they purchase a good or service!

You missed my point. My corporations will buy and sell everything I need, except for food. Everyone will do the same thing. REIT's will own the Real Estate, Transportation will all be leased, etc. etc. The only people who will pay taxes are the poor and theirs will be rebated back to them. The Government will get almost zero revenue. That is why the VAT taxes the goods as they are produced.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry considering you fail to understand the people are the government. They have the power to dictate to their politicians how they want their government run. Unfortunately apathy has allowed the income tax to evolve into a tool used more for controlling people than collecting taxes. Americans For Fair Taxation understand this concept and are consequently forming an increasingly strong grassroots effort forcing Congress critters to realize they either support fundamental tax reform with The Fair Tax or risk losing their jobs in upcoming elections.

Yes people dictate to their representatives how they want things run and they want handouts! It is only apathy from the taxpayers, the recipients aren't apathetic at all. The Congress Critters know that they won't get re elected if they don't bring home the bacon.

The income tax is precisely the problem. I find it curious you oppose the Fair Tax but fail to offer an alternative. The only reasonable explanation is you are in favor of maintaining the status quo income tax code. The question then becomes what advantages do you feel the income tax has over The Fair Tax?

I actually have a ton of alternatives once government spending is under control. Would you believe that if government spending was less than 10% of the GDP that Federal Taxation would not be necessary? If we could constitutionally limit Government spending and borrowing the problem becomes very easy to solve. It is when the Government taxes and spends the majority of the GDP that we have problems. No tax system will survive that kind of stress for long.

The income tax is precisely the problem. I find it curious you oppose the Fair Tax but fail to offer an alternative. The only reasonable explanation is you are in favor of maintaining the status quo income tax code. The question then becomes what advantages do you feel the income tax has over The Fair Tax?

I only oppose the Fair Tax because I see it becoming an additional tax. The income tax when it was originally implemented was not a burdensome tax. It was only for the wealthy and they paid a very tiny percent of their income.

I propose that the solution is to limit Government spending to 5% of the GDP. Once that is accomplished the fair tax would be great : )

126 posted on 09/24/2007 8:55:30 AM PDT by LeGrande (Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
if double taxation is a problem now, consider when EVERY SINGLE raw material purchase is taxed along the production line.

The oil is taxed when made into plastic is taxed to make the switch is taxed when sold to the car maker is taxed when the car is sold to the consumer. QUADRUPPLE.

this statement shows you have no idea of what the fair tax taxes and when it taxes it. You are speaking of a VAT, which is nothing like the NRST.

127 posted on 09/24/2007 8:56:28 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
For this post, I assume your $600 fee is on a contract basis and you get a 1099.

So your current tax rate is what? 15% for FICA plus income taxes. Which will both be eliminated. So for the same $600, after forwarding on the NRST, you end up with about the same amount of money if not more at the end of the day.

128 posted on 09/24/2007 9:02:21 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
That is an out right lie. We will not keep 100% of our pay checks. We still have state taxes and benefit deductions.

I will grant you the state taxes. But what benefit deductions are you talking about that will remain? SS and Medicare? Nope. Those are eliminated by the Fair Tax.

129 posted on 09/24/2007 9:06:15 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Nope, my CPA has it structured so I pay a lot less than that. And he’s a conservative CPA, meaning his recommendations are much more safe than risky, so there are no shenanigans going on.


130 posted on 09/24/2007 9:07:17 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
That’s a non-responsive reply to MY situation. Read my post again of you really want to answer.

Yes, it was. I was parodying the typical FairTax response.

131 posted on 09/24/2007 9:07:39 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Come on, this over simplification is “taxing”

State tax, 401k, medical, dental, vision...

Not 100% of paycheck by any means is kept, but that is what is implied in the rhetoric.

You guys need to stop sounding like a infomercial ad...

132 posted on 09/24/2007 9:11:54 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

[Smacks head] I missed that. Sorry.


133 posted on 09/24/2007 9:15:18 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
State tax, 401k, medical, dental, vision...

I think it is clearly implied and understood that your check will be free from federal withholdings.

Calling fair tax supporters liars because you will still have 401(k), medical, etc... still withheld is akin to calling them liars because your exwife has child support withheld from your check.

134 posted on 09/24/2007 9:53:40 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
But that is not the rhetoric. People are not always that smart. They may assume such things are now paid by employer etc.

Advertising “Keep 100% of your paycheck” is simply misleading.

135 posted on 09/24/2007 10:10:24 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: netvictory

I think the fair tax is great. I also think no major reordering of the revenue system of this country will happen in our lifetime.


136 posted on 09/24/2007 10:12:35 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (RON PAUL: "It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
dvertising “Keep 100% of your paycheck” is simply misleading.

No it's not. Removing Federal withholding will almost get you to 100%. Anyone with a pulse knows this doesn't apply to state taxes, medical premiums and retirement plans.

137 posted on 09/24/2007 11:38:17 AM PDT by groanup ("I'm not the one on the defensive here." xcamel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Almost...

There’s the rub...

And again with the assumptions, you assume people all are thinking about those details when they see the pitch.

It will go a lot further it you guys will quit parsing terms and running sales pitches and just say what it does and acknowledge the weaknesses as well as the strengths.

138 posted on 09/24/2007 12:18:26 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
It will go a lot further it you guys will quit parsing terms and running sales pitches and just say what it does and acknowledge the weaknesses as well as the strengths.

We have a website that has a FAQ section that explains every aspect. Your predecessors on these threads have often used the same argument that you make. It was pretextual then and it's pretextual now. Come on, don't you anti's have a scriptwriter?

139 posted on 09/24/2007 12:46:37 PM PDT by groanup ("I'm not the one on the defensive here." xcamel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Yes, but in sales, it is first impressions. I have seen the FAQ and like I said over a week ago I am chewing the details from multiple resources. But bold initial claims and planting everyone that has an issue with the FairTax as an SQL or IRS lover is not helping, it reduces credibility.
140 posted on 09/24/2007 12:57:15 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson