Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative California - Had Enough Yet?
October 14, 2007 | Chuck Plante - aka backtothestreets

Posted on 10/14/2007 5:55:54 AM PDT by backtothestreets

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: backtothestreets

I love these attempts at splitting California, it’s been going on for over a hundred years. I wouldn’t mind if it happened.

The problem is that the concentration of population is in the LA area, and they control resources such as water, which is mostly in northern Cal. The SoCali’s like it just the way it is, and will not vote for a split.


41 posted on 10/14/2007 9:21:01 AM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq— via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I don’t think the original poster, is talking about a north/south split.

What’s the point of that?

You’ll have two liberal-majority states, which are still controlled by one party.

Split California directly into blue state Cal, and red state Cal.

There will need to be serious discussions about how that is done — for example you can’t just have two blue blotches surrounded by red (although that represents California) — probably you’ll need to keep a corridor open between the two major metropolitan areas, or it just won’t be feasible.

It may mean giving up the central coastline, but frankly all that area is pretty liberal too. Santa Barbara. Ventura. San Luis Obispo.

I really, really like this idea.


42 posted on 10/14/2007 9:26:49 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (I like Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
I would also give them Sacramento county, it is small and heavily infested. Santa Barbra could also present a problem.
43 posted on 10/14/2007 9:32:55 AM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

Alternate approach:

(only half tongue in cheek)

Have the entire rural east half of the state, simply merge with Nevada...

New Nevada would become a big Republican state, balancing out the electoral votes of the now-smaller leftist California.

Win. Win.


44 posted on 10/14/2007 9:42:05 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (I like Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
The Democrats in Sacramento and in Washington DC would have to give their consent. Would they really want to lose votes and create two GOP Senate seats for a conservative state? It will happen on a cold day in hell.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

45 posted on 10/14/2007 9:43:42 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
Go for it. We have the same problem in my state. However, we are outnumbered by the left, who reside west of the Cascades.

The last effort to divide Washington State was lead by Sen. Bob Morton (R) in 2005. It's been tried numerous times, always fails. The socialists on the west side don't want to lose their power or your tax revenue.

From the Seattle PI, Feb 2005:

The Republican from Orient [Sen. Bob Morton] is the prime sponsor on a joint memorial in the Senate that asks President Bush to create a new state east of the Cascades that would comprise 20 of the current state's 39 counties. Nine other Republican senators have signed on in support. Similar measures have been introduced in past years without success.

Link

The rest of the article is worth the read.

46 posted on 10/14/2007 9:51:28 AM PDT by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Mexafornia is a result of a state ruled by girlymen and women with snap on tools.


47 posted on 10/14/2007 10:00:58 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Thanks for the link. I’m quite familiar with Sen. Morton, and past attempts at seceding from the coast. I hate and despise democrats, and am tired of being ruled by those arrogant swine. I would love to be able to secede. Don’t think that it’ll ever happen, though.


48 posted on 10/14/2007 12:33:41 PM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
You have offered a serious proposal so I'll offer a serious reply.

Here are my 2 main concerns:

1) Those liberals, not resident in the new state, will flea to the new state and the problem will simply be recreated in the new state.

2) As the skilled, moneyed and motivated liberals flea the two, old, liberal enclaves , those counties will be consumed by Mexicans. As the Mexican demographic soars in these counties, the US face the prospect of at least one and possibly two enclaves in it's midst, whose principal residents are foreign nationals with no education, skills, capital or a desire to maintain a political connection with the US. Those foreign nationals will control two major US ports.

49 posted on 10/14/2007 12:56:08 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I love almost every idea I’ve heard that splits up California. But in order to get it so that the majority in the state would vote for its passage, you need to come up with something that the millions of socal folks will go for. They are the majority, they won’t vote for something that makes them give up more than they gain.


50 posted on 10/14/2007 1:34:28 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq— via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: liege

People have been talking about dividing the state of California even when it was part of Mexico! The state is really two states—Northies are pretentious and snobs, Southies are layed back (No southern Californian cares if you call Los Angeles LA—but try to call sin city by the bay Frisco and see what happens). In the south we call the northern Californians “Soggyheads” (Because the rain has softened their brains). Divide the state into North and South California. Divide it at Santa Maria. South California’s Capital could be Santa Barbara—Their court- house even looks like a state capital! Our state motto could be Kowabunga! The state rodent Micky Mouse. Maybe we should unilaterally declare South California the 51st State and appoint Mel Gibson as governor until elections could be held. The best day to do this action: April 1st. April Fools Day.


51 posted on 10/14/2007 2:04:54 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

“The proposed initiative for the change on how our electoral delegates are selected is dead in the water from what I read a couple weeks back. The Republican proponents that created the proposal have abandoned it last I heard.”

That is a real shame, I was hoping you all could pull it off. Republicans chickened out again, what a surprise!


52 posted on 10/14/2007 3:44:25 PM PDT by 12th_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: umgud

You are quite right. I had given that a passing thought at one point, but the thought passed quickly and with no action on my part. You have done great with a list and it is an important aspect worth consideration and action.


53 posted on 10/14/2007 4:07:12 PM PDT by backtothestreets (My bologna has a first name, it's J-O-R-G-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
If it can be done quickly enough, I'd offer a half million dollar property in the midst of the shaded southern area in exchange for acceptible similar current value on the non-shaded area:
Hint - workshop, trees, not desert sands.

PS: The suggestion should get around the contiguous area arguement by providing for free passage by sea between SF and LA/LB, the same by non shaded vessles through shaded coastal waters, and by noting that the libs get the best commercial harbors on the Pacific coast.

PPS: For the benefit of folks living in rational sections of the US, a half mil in LA county is a starter house.

54 posted on 10/14/2007 4:15:36 PM PDT by norton (Go ahead, vote for Hunter, you know you want to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
How about simply ceding the San Fran Bay region back to the United States as an "unorganized" territory which is "surplus to the needs of the state of California".

Then build a fence around it.

55 posted on 10/14/2007 4:17:33 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek
They didn’t like us, and we didn’t like them.

Northern California has always thought of themselves ha more civilized, better educated and just plain more worthy than Southern California.

I often was in SF when the Lakers and the Celtics would be in the play offs. Lakers fans were the enemies to them.

56 posted on 10/14/2007 4:24:35 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

I live in what used to be the most conservative Calif. county (Placer County). Unfortunately, we were invaded by people from the Bay Area cashing in on their homes. I see more liberal bumper stickers than ever before. One day I was driving on the freeway when I saw an American flag on the bumper of a Toyota Prius about a 100 feet ahead. The Prius normally have a lot of liberal bumper stickers (second only to the Suburu Forester). I thought “Wow! Finally a patriotic bumper sticker on a Prius”. Unfortunately, as I got closer I read “these colors don’t rule the world”.


57 posted on 10/14/2007 4:30:35 PM PDT by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

But it’s perfectly clear to anyone that the denizens of Northern California around SF Bay are not civilized at all. So where did they get the idea they were superior to anyone else?


58 posted on 10/14/2007 4:35:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Thanks!

The proposal is very much a starting point, and I expect it will be revised with the help of people more qualified than me to assess the pros and cons.

I had included the four Central California coastal counties, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura for specific reasons.

Rural Monterey and Santa Barbara counties are quite conservative, although their urban centers are liberal. San Luis Obispo and Ventura counties conservative. Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties are where our offshore oil is located. And I’ve a sense that if the new state is formed, a well known state senator from Ventura County will be the first governor of the new state.

Yes, seeing how the problem with illegal immigrants plays out would be one of the most interesting aspects to watch. I am quite certain the larger state would not be sympathetic to illegal immigrants and the result would send the illegal immigrant population into the two small heavily populated areas forming the smaller state. The smaller state would have a ratio of 2 illegal immigrants for every 3 legal residents. No telling how long the citizens in those areas would be willing to provides free healthcare, housing, and food, but I don’t imagine they would do it for too long.

I truly believe the smaller state will find itself taking some more conservative approaches to problems under this proposal. I see that as one of the benefits. It will shake those areas back to living in the real world.

I’ll ask about making a ping list for this to get you and others interested on the list and keep all informed of developments.

I’m really counting on FreeRepublic and California FReepers to get this known and win.

59 posted on 10/14/2007 4:38:58 PM PDT by backtothestreets (My bologna has a first name, it's J-O-R-G-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Have read the Constitution more times than I could ever possibly count. Every time I read the section regarding new states, it always has this statement within the clause you referred to; "without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress."

Maine was formed from Massachusetts, and West Virginia formed from Virginia.

Congress gave such approval to split the state when California was admitted to the Union, and there is no expiration on that provision. Also, California voters preempt the legislature, and assume the power of the legislature on initiative matters under the state constitution.
60 posted on 10/14/2007 4:48:40 PM PDT by backtothestreets (My bologna has a first name, it's J-O-R-G-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson