Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
ObamaCrimes.com Phillip Berg ^ | 10/25/2008 | Phillip j. Berg

Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae

Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end. UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

# # #

Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: antichrist; berg; birthcertificate; certifigate; citizenship; leftwingconspiracy; obama; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last
To: Danae
What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

A great quote indeed, but the G. A. is not a corollary to the Constitution and thus has no judicial weight.

It's kinda like citing the Golden Rule as an extension of the Ten Commandments.
21 posted on 10/25/2008 4:02:29 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

From Americasright.com

“So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.

“If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”(from Surrick’s decision)”


22 posted on 10/25/2008 4:03:11 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

It also may be that the citizens have no ‘standing’ until or unless Obama is actually elected President.

If he isn’t,the the point is mute.

This is just a guess....


23 posted on 10/25/2008 4:03:27 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Calpernia; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; Polarik; PhilDragoo; ...
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court

Ping.

24 posted on 10/25/2008 4:03:33 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Ping.


25 posted on 10/25/2008 4:04:00 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

What is the relevance of this?


26 posted on 10/25/2008 4:04:13 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Did I scoop Drudge???

LMAO


27 posted on 10/25/2008 4:05:00 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Possible conflict of interest


28 posted on 10/25/2008 4:05:10 PM PDT by ncfool (ObaBama stands for The New United Socialist State or "TNUSSA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Danae
If his suit was thrown out based on his not having legal standing, who DOES have standing to question a candidate's eligibility? Is it only those who have constitutional rights to cast the votes? So it would be any registered voter for house or senate seats, and only certified state electors for the president?

Mark

29 posted on 10/25/2008 4:05:53 PM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Do some Google research on Kulaks. Then begin to get VERY worried. Especially if you own property.
30 posted on 10/25/2008 4:06:05 PM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Possibly the Senate. Ultimately the Electoral college, but there is NO precident, no Candidate who was a Naturalized citizen rather than Natural Born has ever gotten this far. The Issue was always attended to LONG before this. This is where the DNC failed everyone, all Americans. They didn’t Vet their Candidate.

Obama has not shown anyone anywhere in a verifyable VALID form that he is a Natural Born Citizen with that Legal status.

Not once.


31 posted on 10/25/2008 4:07:58 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lovesdogs
Your reply in and of itself is almost contradictory. First you say

While I do not agree with Berg’s “truther” stuff. Politics have made the strangest bedfellows ever in this election.

Then you go on to say he is right for pursuing this course of action. Your comment would have had more believability if you had omitted your petty disagreement with Berg....

32 posted on 10/25/2008 4:08:31 PM PDT by Born In America (Affirmative action is no way to elect a President, now or ever....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

“Could the judge or somebody tell me WHO has standing? And when we find out, let that/those person(s) file suit.”

Well, if an American Citizen doesn’t have standing to ask for verification of the Constitutional qualifications of a presidential candidate, then, I guess, only Queen Elisabeth II must have standing because the Constitution has apparently been revoked!


33 posted on 10/25/2008 4:09:16 PM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

“He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence.”

No actually he is asking the SCOTUS to uphold the law.


34 posted on 10/25/2008 4:09:32 PM PDT by chainsaw ( No racist radical Muslims in the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Good. This seems to be an area the SCOTUS can address without making any new law. Force Barry or the Hawaii Health department to show it.


35 posted on 10/25/2008 4:09:32 PM PDT by eyedigress ( My first 4 wheeler was on the rocks in Fairbanks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Wow!

Yeah...I’m glad I don’t own 8 acres...(like it matters)


36 posted on 10/25/2008 4:10:02 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
I has to do with Legal precedence, mostly in Tax laws, that have been decided in the past. You don't have the legal standing to legally question your taxes either.

Yea... I am not kidding.

37 posted on 10/25/2008 4:10:22 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

34 pages to say “frivolous and not worthy of discussion”?


38 posted on 10/25/2008 4:10:25 PM PDT by cmj328
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I will stinken donate!!!!

Awesome video of report grilling Biden!!!!

FINALLY!!!


39 posted on 10/25/2008 4:10:51 PM PDT by Texas4ever (!WHO IS OBAMA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Why do we need a LAW to police the Constitution? That’s his &*%$# job!!! Who appointed this moron?


40 posted on 10/25/2008 4:10:57 PM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson