Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum. (Trolling 101)
E-Mail and Freepers

Posted on 01/16/2009 12:36:53 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator

Thanks to many FReepers who have sent us this information. Apparently, this is floating around the Internet now. It is a guide to trolling. While it may or may not be fake in its origins, we do see these techniques all the time and felt it would be good to share with everyone.

______________________________________________________ COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a ‘uncontrolled forum.’

Technique #1 - ‘FORUM SLIDING’

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by ‘forum sliding.’ In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to ‘age.’ Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a ‘forum slide.’ The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a ‘forum slide’ and ‘flush’ the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then ‘replying’ to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting ‘slides’ down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - ‘CONSENSUS CRACKING’

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at *********) is ‘consensus cracking.’ To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger ‘evidence’ or disinformation in your favour is slowly ‘seeded in.’ Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then ‘abort’ the consensus cracking by initiating a ‘forum slide.’

Technique #3 - ‘TOPIC DILUTION’

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a ‘RESOURCE BURN.’ By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a ‘gossip mode.’ In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to ‘drive in the wedge.’ By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - ‘INFORMATION COLLECTION’

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a ‘show you mine so me yours’ posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your ‘favorite weapon’ and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favorite ‘technique of operation.’ From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - ‘ANGER TROLLING’

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to ‘stage’ a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to ‘lead’ the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you ‘do not care what the authorities think!!’ inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - ‘GAINING FULL CONTROL’

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavorable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the ‘ultimate victory’ as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a ‘honey pot’ gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

CONCLUSION

Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precedence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.


TOPICS: Announcements; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuse; definitionoftroll; freerepublic; garbage; howtotroll; pl; repository1; trolling; trolling101; trolls; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: Sidebar Moderator

Thank you for the tips.


21 posted on 01/16/2009 12:49:10 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Understanding the thrust of trolling


22 posted on 01/16/2009 12:51:07 PM PST by egannacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
We want new blood here.

Exactly, if it is obvious that a newbie is not a troll, we encourage members to help them along and give them a warm welcome. We are getting a lot of new sign ups and a whole new generation of FReepers thanks to FreeRepublic pages on sites like Facebook that other FReepers have made.

23 posted on 01/16/2009 12:51:07 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I will if u will talk about the one-eyed claustrophobic tree-legged, fiscally challenged, quarter horses, raised on Humpback Hill that has 2 sheep as girlfriends??


24 posted on 01/16/2009 12:51:38 PM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Glad some folks know the origin of the term! :-)


25 posted on 01/16/2009 12:52:54 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Technique #2 - ‘CONSENSUS CRACKING’

While I agree that trolling occurs, I don't think this document accurately reflects the mindset of the troll.

I suspect this document is bogus.

26 posted on 01/16/2009 12:54:52 PM PST by DouglasKC (See? An example of "Consensus Cracking".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: All

oops..sorry ‘bout the wordwrap


28 posted on 01/16/2009 12:56:07 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I propose....


29 posted on 01/16/2009 12:58:31 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Let’s try to help you with that formatting:
_________________________________________

Anyone remember this one, too?

The Flamer’s Bible

Revision 1: Dec. 2, 1987 by Joe Talmadge

In the time I have been posting to net, I have encountered flame wars of epic proportions (Brahms Gang vs. Tim Maroney), and flame wars of a more modest nature (MIT vs. CIT). Flaming has evolved into a highly-stylized art form, complete with unwritten rules and guidelines.

Here, I have attempted to document the Art of Flaming, in such a way as it will be interesting to old hands (flame masters) and novices (virgins) alike. Without a further ado, then, I present:

The Twelve Commandments of Flaming

1. Make things up about your opponent: It’s important to make your lies sound true. Preface your argument with the word “clearly.” “Clearly, Fred Flooney is a liar, and a dirtball to boot.”

2. Be an armchair psychologist: You’re a smart person. You’ve heard of Freud. You took a psychology course in college. Clearly, you’re qualified to psychoanalyze your opponent. “Polly Purebread, by using the word ‘zucchini’ in her posting, shows she has a bad case of penis envy.”

3. Cross-post your flames: Everyone on the net is just waiting for the next literary masterpiece to leave your terminal. From rec.arts.wobegon to alt.gourmand, they’re all holding their breaths until your next flame. Therefore, post everywhere.

4. Conspiracies abound: If everyone’s against you, the reason can’t *possibly* be that you’re a ********. There’s obviously a conspiracy against you, and you will be doing the entire net a favor by exposing it.

5. Lawsuit threats: This is the reverse of Rule #4 (sort of like the Yin & Yang of flaming). Threatening a lawsuit is always considered to be in good form. “By saying that I’ve posted to the wrong group, Bertha has libeled me, slandered me, and sodomized me. See you in court, Bertha.”

6. Force them to document their claims: Even if Harry Hoinkus states outright that he likes tomato sauce on his pasta, you should demand documentation. If Newsweek hasn’t written an article on Harry’s pasta preferences, then Harry’s obviously lying.

7. Use foreign phrases: French is good, but Latin is the lingua franca of flaming. You should use the words “ad hominem” at least three times per article. Other favorite Latin phrases are “ad nauseum,” “vini, vidi, vici,” and “fettuccini alfredo.”

8. Tell ‘em how smart you are: Why use intelligent arguments to convince them you’re smart when all you have to do is tell them? State that you’re a member of Mensa or Mega or Dorks of America. Tell them the scores you received on every exam since high school. “I got an 800 on my SATs, LSATs, GREs, MCATs, and I can also spell the word ‘premeiotic’.”

9. Accuse your opponent of censorship. It is your right as an American citizen to post whatever the hell you want to the net (as guaranteed by the 37th Amendment, I think). Anyone who tries to limit your cross-posting or move a flame war to email is either a communist, a fascist, or both.

10. Doubt their existence: You’ve never actually seen your opponent, have you? And since you’re the center of the universe, you should have seen them by now, shouldn’t you? Therefore, THEY DON’T EXIST! This is the beauty of flamers’ logic.

11. Lie, cheat, steal, leave the toilet seat up.

12. When in doubt, insult: If you forget the other 11 rules, remember this one. At some point during your wonderful career as a flamer you will undoubtedly end up in a flame war with someone who is better than you. This person will expose your lies, tear apart your arguments, make you look generally like a bozo. At this point, there’s only one thing to do: insult the dirtbag!!! “Oh yeah? Well, your mother does strange things with vegetables.”


The Golden Rule of Flaming

My flames will be witty, insulting, interesting, funny, caustic, or sarcastic, but never, ever, will they be boring.

Here endeth the scriptures.


30 posted on 01/16/2009 12:59:25 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
This is almost as good as Friday Troll luncheon. Thanks. We do like a captive troll to poke at sometimes.... Just saying....

/johnny

31 posted on 01/16/2009 1:00:01 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Good point! Being new doesn’t make someone a troll. It’s disagreeing with me that does. ;-)


32 posted on 01/16/2009 1:01:05 PM PST by Mogwai ("I trust no-one, not even myself." - Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Please add me to the homosexual minority humpback whales list.

Thanks!


33 posted on 01/16/2009 1:04:29 PM PST by frithguild (Can I drill your head now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Bookmarking. ;-)

Newbies? We've got a few long term members that everything they post seems to fall into one or more of these categories.

34 posted on 01/16/2009 1:05:57 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

I’m sure I don’t know what you’re talking about...


35 posted on 01/16/2009 1:07:13 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator; SouthTexas; glock rocks; B4Ranch; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; calcowgirl

Ping... FYI


36 posted on 01/16/2009 1:07:17 PM PST by tubebender ( If swimming is good for your figure, explain whales to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

Done.


37 posted on 01/16/2009 1:08:43 PM PST by null and void (Hey 0bama, now that you've caught the car, what are you going to do with it, hmmm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Anger/Insult sliding - see any fairtax thread.


38 posted on 01/16/2009 1:09:45 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Noob's could just buy my new book and save lots of heartache.

39 posted on 01/16/2009 1:10:56 PM PST by MarineBrat (The New York Times is a Communist Kamikaze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Yes - I’m a Noob still :) Maybe we could assign FReeper “Elders” as mentors!


40 posted on 01/16/2009 1:11:29 PM PST by Lilpug15 (Obama: "They Need More Arabic Translators in Afghanistan...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson