Posted on 04/19/2009 6:01:08 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Perhaps they just dont want to think through the details. Then again - - maybe some of them dont have the capacity to think through the details.
Im referring to the apparent plethora of partisan, passionate, see-no-evil Obama minions, who become outraged should any of the rest of us ask questions about the forty-fourth President.
I continually encounter the minions both as callers on talk radio, and as mailers responding to my various editorial columns. Whereas last year during the election cycle when I would dare to ask questions of the dear leader Obama, the minions first line of attack would be to call me a racist (or as one talk show caller put it to me last October, you just cant handle the idea of being under the authority of a black man, Austin), today the line of attack is different. And while each talk show call and each email message are unique, the minions nonetheless typically follow a predictable pattern.
These days, the minions first line of attack on those of us who dare to ask questions about the dear leader seems to be to change the subject back to President George W. Bush. I heard plenty of this in March when I was back at my Washington, D.C. radio home, 630 WMAL, during the fiasco with the AIG Corporation and their executives. When I posed the question why did President Obama hand-over $30 billion of our tax dollars to AIG in the first place?, the responses frequently followed this pattern.
This whole bailout mess got started with Bush one caller stated to me (this is true, of course - - but it didnt answer the question about Obamas bailout behavior). Obama wouldnt have to bailout AIG had Bush not destroyed it, and if you think things are bad now, lets go back and review the previous eight years were some of the other subject-changing comments I got on talk radio. And after authoring a column entitled Is Obama The Moral Alternative to Capitalism? wherein I detailed the Presidents propensity to control private corporations, and determine who their CEOs and board members will be, one simple-minded minion emailed I suppose you think things would be better if Bush and his cronies were in charge
After attempting to change the subject, and get the focus of the conversation OFF of dear leader Obama, the second line of attack from the minions seems to be to demonize the talk show host, and talk radio generally. I got an earful of this during a recent show I hosted at Phoenix, Arizonas NewsTalk 92-3 KTAR. Noting President Obamas plans to set earnings limits on corporate executives, I posed the question, should President Obama determine how much money youre allowed to earn?
You all cant do anything but hate on this guy a caller said in response. All you talk radio guys know how to do is trash Obama another caller said.
Oh really? I was hating on the dear leader, and trashing him? I pressed further with one caller, saying seriously should President Obama set the limit on how much money youre allowed to make at your job - - just to make certain that you dont make too much?
Hes not proposing to limit my pay, you idiot the minion replied. Hes only limiting the salaries of corporate CEOs, which he should be doing.
So, are you saying that some of your fellow Americans deserve less freedom that you do? I asked. You should be free to make as much money as you can, but your fellow American should not - - is that your point?
Thats not what Im saying, you idiot! the angry minion replied.
Of course, that was precisely what the angry minion was saying.
The third line of attack from the minions seems to be a simple how dare you? response. I encountered this after the publication of a column in my local hometown newspaper. After stating the obvious about President Obamas economic plan - - that his plan has essentially nothing to do with growing the private sector economy, and everything to do with creating more government control over private individuals and businesses - - I had people, literally, stopping me around town to ask how dare you? - - or something similar.
While attending a school function with my ten year old son, another Dad confronted me and asked, how could you say such a terrible thing about the President of the United States?
I supported my claims in the column I told the Dad. Its all right there in the text.
But how could you say such a thing about the President? he asked.
What part of my analysis was inaccurate? I replied.
But this meltdown isnt Obamas fault he stated.
So whats your point? What part of my analysis was inaccurate?
But hes trying to do the right thing, Austin .
I hope you remain willing to ask questions. But be prepared for the attacks - - and by all means, dont expect any rational answers.
they are all hypocrites
Yes we can, Thank You Satan
it’s because they realize that if a media source were to harp on a target, nonstop, for weeks and months on end... it would eventually sour the general opinion of that target by the populace... domestic and internationally.
just imagine if we started calling him stupid (which we should) or a nazi (at least a statist) or complained that he mispronounced the word Orion (or wreak) or started making up ‘evidence’ that would make him look bad.
forget showing the truth that he wrote about himself in his own ‘book’, or the lack of ‘truth’ regarding his background. you don’t even need to get picky. that’s just how bad he is... how vulnerable their political position is... and they know it.
that’s why they are soooo hypersensitive
Brilliant!Must be shown for the next 4 years.
Here’s what gets me. Liberals say “where were these tea parties at when Bush & the Republicans were spending too much?” That statement is technically true, but it misses the point. You see, if these tea parties would have happened then, the Left would have still denounced us as mean-old right-wing extremists for not supporting their spending. They would have called Bush and the Republicans evil for vetoing funds for “the children” and all this other crap. Another reason why it’s ridiculous for Republicans to abandon their principles. Now they have no credibility to attack Dems on spending because they’re the ones who got the ball rolling. That’s why Bush’s original bailout was completely bone-headed because I knew the Dems would always go back and use him as an excuse.
> Hes not proposing to limit my pay, you idiot the minion replied. Hes only limiting the salaries of corporate CEOs, which he should be doing.
So, are you saying that some of your fellow Americans deserve less freedom that you do? I asked. You should be free to make as much money as you can, but your fellow American should not - - is that your point?
Thats not what Im saying, you idiot! the angry minion replied.
-I love the way liberals engage in intelligent talk.
"He is our President and deserves to be called by that title!" the writer declared. Apparently, "Mr." was not respectful enough.
All I could think of was for at least seven of the last eight years President Bush served, one was lucky to see the words "President" and "Bush" in the same article, much less right next to each other. Yet for the chosen one, Obama supporters expect nothing less than in every utterance, every reference, full respect be given.
No longer is "dissent" the "best way to protect democracy." For Obama supporters, complete obedience and deference to the President is required.
LOL
I did not draw this cartoon, but I may very well have been responsible for it. That cartoon was released on March 30. On March 27 I put this graphic on the teleprompter graphic thread.
The cartoonist need not worry about me chasing him in court or anything like that, I just get a kick out of it being used at all!
They consider that intelligent? I consider that 4th-grade level.
Plenty on the right just referred to him as ‘Bush’ as well.
Too dumb to be wrong.
-E01
Click on THE LORD OF LEFTISTS for more laughs!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.