Posted on 01/09/2012 6:12:43 PM PST by Nachum
CONCORD, N.H. | President Obama is on the Democratic ballot for New Hampshires primary on Tuesday, despite the efforts of some Republican state legislators who argue the president doesnt qualify as a natural-born citizen. I dont know where he was born, and I really dont care, said state Rep. Larry Rappaport of Colebrook, N.H., but I think fraud is being perpetrated on the citizens of New Hampshire. Mr. Rappaport and several GOP colleagues have been trying to get the New Hampshire secretary of state to remove Mr. Obama from the ballot. Their argument isnt focused
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I keep trying to address this but my message doesn't seem to be getting any traction. I think Obama's "long form" birth certificate is a REAL replacement birth certificate issued by Hawaii as a result of Obama's adoption by his Grandparents. When a child is adopted in any state, the state creates a new replacement birth certificate which is designed to look real to a casual observer. I know this better than most because *I* am adopted and *I* have one of these replacement birth certificates.
What Obama has been given by the State of Hawaii is a State Fabricated replacement birth certificate because his original is sealed by court order due to his adoption. It is not his original birth certificate, but it is a legitimate birth certificate as far as the state of Hawaii is concerned.
Think about it. This idea makes perfect sense.
Let me offer an alternative explanation. I suggest that what he has shown is an Actual birth certificate created by the Hawaii Dept of Health. When a child is adopted, the normal process in any state is for the adoption court to seal the original birth certificate, and then order the State to produce a "replacement" birth certificate.
These "replacement" birth certificates are created by the state so as to make it appear to any casual observer that the child was actually born to the adoptive parents. I know this for a fact because I have one of these replacement birth certificate. (I was adopted when I was five, but it was never a secret to me.)
I think Obama was adopted by his Grandparents in 1971 after his mom abandoned him and went back to Indonesia. I think Obama has since gone to court to have his adoption reversed, or overturned, or some such, and the document he has been waving around is the result of a court order to create him a new replacement document.
I think it was MADE by the State of Hawaii, and is therefore a legal, albeit not original document. Hawaii is STILL HIDING his original document.
On the one hand, its hard to take it seriously, Mr. Buckley said. But they ought to be focusing on jobs and the economy and the things real Americans care about.Take heart, my FRiends!I actually find this a very interesting statement. Especially since the Democrats would like to do everything in their power to divert attention away from jobs and the economy - mostly since Obama has destroyed what economy we did have.
This statement implies that they are even more afraid of the NBC issue than the economic malaise we are currently suffering!
I do not believe that is the only issue. I think another issue is that a Presidential candidate should not be allowed to hide his proof of citizenship from the public. Obama should have been compelled to produce his bona-fide birth certificate regardless of what it shows.
A Presidential candidate should not be entitled to any privacy regarding his citizenship status.
Even better!
RATHER THAN LIMIT THE DAMAGE TO OBAMA HIMSELF, THEY'LL IMPLICATE AND INCLUDE ALL OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IN THE FRAUD!
Darned caps lock...
If you need any more evidence, consider this. HI changed their ‘rules’ so as to violate their actual laws, all in order to put LF BCs off limits. Now, in true post modern style, they say short forms equal LFs, and expect intelligent people to fall in line. If a person comes to them and points out that according to law he [Virginia Sunahara’s brother] is entitled to the original LF BC of his own sister, they refuse.
That is a load of dishonest BS—but it makes perfect sense. HI is covering up Big Time for Obama, and this is the result.
Still Obot Trolls see nothing amiss. They have drunk the moonbat Kool Aid, and are beyond hope.
Ha, Boner’s not Eeevil, just an incompetent crybaby.
Nice that they are doubling down on it, though.
We may yet see Pelosi live up to her nickname.
We hang traitors.
.. Ping!
Exactly!
Thanks!
agreed...more is better!
I wouldn't read anything too much into the quotes from Buckley (Dem state chair in New Hampshire). All he is doing is giving the standard Obamaton talking points in response to a question on the constitutional eligibility issue. Their strategy has always been to marginalize those of us who want to observe and live by the Constitution as kooks of one kind or another, and that's exactly the card that Buckley is playing here. They clearly don't want to prove that Zero is a natural born citizen because they can't.
Thanks for the ping!
He should care. Didn't he swear to uphold the Constitution?
Excellent point.
None of this would have succeeded w’out decades of public school dumbing down/anti-USA propaganda. If our public school curricula isn’t turned around the country is down the tubes w or w’out Obama. This is such a critical issue. I wish one of the candidates was taking it seriously.
How positive are you that we will have a fair election this time. Did we have one last time?
If Boehner were to bring up impeachment in the House he would definitely have the support of the people. He would go down in history. They could scream racism all they want - I really think they have overplayed that hand.
Escorted out the back door by Lakin and past the WH garbage which he's had other visitors do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.