Posted on 01/27/2012 6:53:39 AM PST by transducer
Tex-Con zapped? Could I have a link?
Ping me when the retread gets zotted.
Check freepmail!
You might be familiar with a little even called the Civil War? Hum? Yes?
Not since the secession of the south has a sitting POTUS failed to make the ballot.
You honestly think that is NOT news??? Wow.
Folks, you cannot fix stupid.
Nor was Obama’s father permanently domiciled in the United States like WKA’s parents were. The Treaty with China stated that those Chinese persons who chose to become permanently domiciled had changed their allegiance. So while they were not citizens, they were considered nationals. Gray could have used that for his justification of WKA’s citizenship, but he didn’t WHY? Because he used it to muddy the waters and protect the POTUS who nominated him to the SCOTUS bench. Chester Arthur.
WKA is not only bad law, it was written by a man with material reason to want to protect Chester Arthur, a man JUST as ineligible for POTUS as Barack Obama is.
Obama has LITERALLY followed everything Arthur did to hide the fact his father wasn’t naturalized until Chester was 14. Even going so far as to throw people a red herring about WHERE HE WAS BORN.
Grrrrr. WKA ought to be overthrown simply based upon Gray’s duplicity. If not for a half a dozen other reasons...
Oops, my mistake.
Hey zotted dumb*** - one of the plaintiffs was a Presidential elector.
He has standing.
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, does it? Thanks for the Ping.
Not so (see United States v. Wong Kim Ark.
-------------------------------------
WKA was found by the court to be a "citizen," in part, because his parentS were perminantely domociled here.
Barry's father was a foreigner here on a temporary student visa.
Barry was born a British subject, owing allegience to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England. Assuming Sr. was his legal father at birth.
Minor, on the other hand, was found to be a citizen because she was a natural born Citizen....born in country, to 2 citizen parents.
oh geez...LOL. guess I should have checked down-thread a bit more. Doesn’t surprise me s/he got the ZOT.
.
I remember the obnoxious, lying, troublemaker LorenC.
He’s ugly. No sex appeal either.
Glad he was zotted. Is he back under a new screen name?
Ohhhhh Kay. No progress along that route, including members of the armed forces questioning the Constitutional qualifications of the current occupant of 1600 PA Ave.
However, the issue of whether he is qualified to be on the ballot for another crack at all this remains open to consideration.
So, finally, let's see some real evidence, not doctored image files, and show that he meets the requirement. In lieu of that, maybe the Democrat Party had better consider finding a new candidate.
The POTUS is not above the law, especially the Constitution he is sworn to uphold.
You guys do realize there is a reason that Mark Levin completely dismisses you right?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hm?...Let me guess!
1) Mark Levin is a cowardly phony.
2) Mark Levin loves money more than truth.
************************************************
Yep, you nailed it!
Welcome to the South son things are done right around here. Maybe you will learn something! They should have never messed with Cain. Newt will hang in there. Pop some popcorn this is going to be fun!
Welcome to the South son things are done right around here. Maybe you will learn something! They should have never messed with Cain. Newt will hang in there. Pop some popcorn this is going to be fun!
What a geeky looking little queer boy he is.
Wrong! One does not have to be on the ballot in every state to be elected President. The requirement is to have the votes of the majority of the presidential electors nationally, or, if no candidate has such a majority, to win the contest in the House of Representatives as prescribed in the Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution.
If fact, in 1960, John F. Kennedy won the national election despite the fact that the Democrats in Mississippi ran a complete slate of unpledged electors, so his name was apparently not on the ballot.
It would appear that rumors of Tex-Con's having been crispyfied are unfounded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.