Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Excalibur, The Rock That May Mark A New Dawn For Man
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 1-9-2003 | Giles Tremlett

Posted on 01/09/2003 9:10:31 PM PST by blam

Excalibur, the rock that may mark a new dawn for man

Paleontologists claim 350,000-year-old find in Spanish cave pushes back boundary of early human evolution

Giles Tremlett in Madrid
Thursday January 9, 2003
The Guardian

They have called it Excalibur, though it was plucked from a pit of bones rather than the stone of Arthurian legend. To the ordinary eye it is a hand-sized, triangular chunk of ochre and purple rock, its surface slightly scratched. But to the palaeontologists who found this axe-head buried in a deep cavern on a Spanish hilltop, it is proof of a terrible and defining moment in the evolutionary history of the human mind.

The discovery in a Spanish cave of what is claimed to be the world's oldest burial artefact was set to provoke a fierce scientific debate about the exact moment when man's mind was lit by the spark of imagination and creativity.

Palaeontologists who discovered the axe-head placed among ancient bones in a cave at Atapuerca, near the city of Burgos in central Spain, yesterday claimed that this key moment in the evolution of man's mind had to be placed at a time well before our own race, Homo sapiens, reached Europe.

Deliberately tossed into a primitive burial chamber, the placing of the axe was a ritual act and evidence that, in the minds of some very ancient Europeans, death had become something more than a mere, brutish fact of nature.

This idea first dawned more than 350,000 years ago on the squat, powerful examples of Homo heidelbergensis whose remains are being slowly excavated from the so-called Pit of Bones at Atapuerca.

The find means that man's development of a mind capable of thinking beyond reality and needs into a world of shared ideas, symbols, fantasy and imagination, may have developed 310,000 years earlier than was thought.

Controversy already rages in the palaeontological community over whether Homo sapiens was the first such deep thinker, or whether that honour goes to the slightly earlier neanderthal.

But it is generally thought that modern, thinking men and women did not arrive until 30-40,000 years ago, sparking a "creative explosion" that produced, among other things, the first art.

"The biggest debate in human evolution is when men's minds appeared, when the spark was lit," Ignacio Martinez, one of the Atapuerca team, told El Pais news paper. The only proof of that spark, he said, would come from rock art, the earliest examples of which are only 40,000 years old, from proof of language use or from burial ceremonies.

The discovery at Atapuerca, if it turned out to be a true example of a ceremonial burial, would be remarkable. As such, it can expect to raise bitter controversy.

Experts contacted by the Guardian yesterday said they were surprised and generally rather sceptical about Excalibur.

"If they could prove it, it would be staggering," said Dr Michael Petraglia, lecturer at Cambridge University's Leverhulme centre for human evolutionary studies. "It would push intentional or symbolic thought back much further than is currently accepted."

Excalibur goes on show for the first time this weekend at an exhibition of Atapuerca's work in the American Museum of Natural History, in New York. It is bound to provoke debate among the many scientists due to appear at the opening conferences.

The director of the Atapuerca dig, Dr Juan Luis Arsuaga, argued in an article in El Pais yesterday that the groups of Homo heidelbergensis probably brought their dead, one-by-one, into the cavern so they could be buried together. "It had to be a collective practice," he said.

"We had gradually become convinced that, incredible as it may seem given the age of the site, this was case of symbolic behaviour, the first of its kind in the history of humanity," he wrote.

"In order to demonstrate that we needed a symbolic object, with its own significance. Then Excalibur appeared from the sediment," he said. "The Pit of Bones had produced a new historic discovery."

But other scientists, while eager to see the written research, were sceptical, saying there did not seem to be proof that the axe had been deliberately placed. "There might be other reasons for it to be there," speculated Dr. Margarita Diaz-Andreu, a Durham University archaeologist.

Dr Petraglia said the find was "potentially exciting" but doubted that it was sufficient to reach such scientifically explosive conclusions about the development of the human mind. "We often have great difficulty in assessing if something is intentional," he said. "Often we require more evidence than one tool."

The Atapuerca team have produced some of the most remarkable palaeontological finds of the past decade, producing 350,000-year-old crania and proof that Homo heidelbergensis was a cannibal. They seemed yesterday to have the backing of at least one scientific heavyweight for their claims that these were also thinking, imaginative, potentially artistic cannibals.

The legendary French scientist Henry de Lumley, director of France's National Museum of Natural History, visited the cave and was told of Excalibur two years ago. He declared the combination of the two things to be "proof of the birth of the first human myths", according to El Pais.

The Pit of Bones, open for excavation for just one month a year, will be keeping archaeologists busy for decades. Excalibur, pulled from among those bones, looked set to spark a debate about the evolution of man's minds that could last just as long.

Even if Homo heidelbergensis was an intelligent, creative, artistic type, it did him no good. He eventually evolved into a neanderthal and then became extinct. Homo sapiens came out of Africa to replace him.

Finds that changed history

The Schoningen spears

In 1997, three wooden spears some 400,000 years old were found in an open-cast coalmine at Schoningen, Germany. The spears, weighted like modern javelins, were proof that the forerunners of homo sapiens could plan, cooperate and hunt

The Chauvet cave

Detailed paintings of lions, mammoths, and rhinoceroses were discovered in the Ardèche valley, southern France, in December 1994. The paintings were more than 30,000 years old, the earliest examples of such sophisticated art

Chinese flutes

A set of bird bones with holes drilled in them are believed to be the world's oldest playable musical instruments, dating back nearly 9,000 years. The flutes, excavated in the mid-Henan province of China in 1999, revealed a sophisticated knowledge of music-making

Czech fabrics

A team led by the US anthropologist Olga Soffer found ancient textile impressions on tiny clay fragments in Dolni Vestonice in the Czech Republic, evidence of cordage and textile production believed to be more than 27,000 years old, 17,000 years earlier than previously thought

Israeli nuts

The earliest definite evidence of nut-cracking using tools was found at the Gesher Benot Ya'aqov site in Israel last year. Archaeologists found the remains of nuts dating back 780,000 years

Swartkrans fire

The earliest evidence for the controlled use of fire was found at Swartkrans, South Africa, in the 60s. It is believed that the hominid responsible 1.5m years ago took a burning log from a naturally caused fire into the cave, but did not have the cognitive ability to make fire itself


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; dawn; excalibur; germany; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; man; mar; multiregionalism; neandertal; new; paleolithic; rock; schoningen; schoningenspears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2003 9:10:32 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Even if Homo heidelbergensis was an intelligent, creative, artistic type, it did him no good. He eventually evolved into a neanderthal and then became extinct. Homo sapiens came out of Africa to replace him.

That hypothesis is starting to look kind of shakey isn't it?

This find is huge....

2 posted on 01/09/2003 9:17:18 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chookter
"That hypothesis is starting to look kind of shakey isn't it?"

Yup. We are Neanderthal.

3 posted on 01/09/2003 9:27:54 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Neanderthals and Cro magnons were the same species. The imperative for a squat robust build died out as cutting tools improved.
4 posted on 01/09/2003 9:31:15 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
"The imperative for a squat robust build died out as cutting tools improved."

A squat compact and robust body was necessary for the Ice Age. Because they were in the colder climates they covered their bodies which deprived them of vitamin 'D' and they turned white.

5 posted on 01/09/2003 9:44:09 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
But we don't share any DNA with Neanderthals. I vote for more testing wherever Neanderthal DNA proves testable. It may just be bad luck that the individual tested came from a group that didn't share in progeniture.
6 posted on 01/09/2003 9:48:19 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Redheads 'Are Neanderthals'
7 posted on 01/09/2003 9:49:15 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Neanderthal-Cro-Magnon Hybrid?
8 posted on 01/09/2003 9:52:31 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
"There might be other reasons for it to be there," speculated Dr. Margarita Diaz-Andreu...

Yep. Getting rid of the murder weapon is yet another sign of human cognition...

9 posted on 01/09/2003 9:54:53 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Redheads are neanderthals.

Yeah, I think I dated one of the most primitive ones some years ago.
10 posted on 01/09/2003 10:07:21 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
I subscribe to Archeology, and yes, I knew about this child. But he died too young to reproduce. But maybe, just maybe, there were more who did grown to maturity and had descendents.

I feel that eventually the fact that Neanderthal genes survive in Europeans will be ascertained.

11 posted on 01/09/2003 10:07:40 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
"I feel that eventually the fact that Neanderthal genes survive in Europeans will be ascertained."

Ditto.

12 posted on 01/09/2003 10:12:58 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
That is an amusing hypothesis but difficult to prove. Truth is more interesting. The ancient Celts originated, most likely, from around the area of the old Euxene Lake which became flooded from the Aegean Sea in a break through an isthmus circa 7,500 years ago. Massive flooding caused an exodus of peoples away from what would become known in the ancient world as the New Euxene Sea (the Black Sea to us).

This ancient flood perhaps explains why so many peoples in the Europe-Asian landmass have myths involving a cataclysmic flood.

13 posted on 01/09/2003 10:18:44 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
The more we investigate, the older we get.
14 posted on 01/09/2003 10:38:00 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
To: f.Christian

Dakmar...

I took a few minutes to decipher that post, and I must say I agree with a lot of what you said.

fC...

These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!

Dakmar...

Where you and I diverge is on the Evolution/Communism thing. You seem to view Darwin and evolution as the beginning of the end for enlighted, moral civilization, while I think Marx, class struggle, and the "dictatorship of the proletariat" are the true dangers.

God bless you, I think we both have a common enemy in the BRAVE-NWO.

452 posted on 9/7/02 8:54 PM Pacific by Dakmar

more . . .

quote . . .

Boris Yeltsin - - -

(parenthesis . . .my additions)

skip . . .

more . . .

one more . . .

start - - -

"I was a communist(DEVILCRAT // liberal // lunatic // evolutionist // maniac) for 30 years . . .

and I listened to so much of this demagoguery(lies // ideology // spin // left rhetoric) that now - - -

with my democratic(conservative // creationist // REPUBLICAN // calm) views - - -

I can no . . . longer(link) - - - stand it,"

stop ! ! !

15 posted on 01/09/2003 10:54:00 PM PST by f.Christian (Is the universe absolute(conservative) . . . or - - - flux // relative(liberal) ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

16 posted on 01/09/2003 10:54:29 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty; blam; chookter; goody2shooz; Billthedrill; wildbill
"... Neanderthals and Cro magnons were the same species. The imperative for a squat robust build died out as cutting tools improved..."

Correction: we are both human, but different species of human. We are Cro-Magnon - they were Neanderthal. The DNA is different.

We did not evolve from Neanderthal, but we may very well have intermingled with them, and produced viable off-spring, though almost all of them would have been mules (unable to reproduce).

I think the correct word is a 'singularity', and describes a fundamental change in humanity. With the ever-accelerating advances in computer technology and bio-engineering, we may yet get to see one or more 'singularities'.

An 'Artificial-Intelligence' computer similar to HAL 9000, or an engineered-human-being with no disease and an incredibly long lifespan are visible in the near future.

Just food for thought - we'll probably kill them............FRegards

17 posted on 01/09/2003 11:14:33 PM PST by gonzo ('I'd never advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity, but they work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
...proof that Homo heidelbergensis was a cannibal.

How do they know that? They'd have to have been eating other humans to be cannibals. It's more likely that they were eating the liberals who were trying to ban their stone axes...

18 posted on 01/09/2003 11:57:14 PM PST by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gonzo
Where did you get that info? I'm welling to look into it. In college I had an English Professor as wide as a linebacker, 5'9'', stocky, and with a bit of a browridge. His "Neanderthalness" did not make him mentally challenged. Wasn't the Neanderthal cranial capacity about 1600ccs as opposed to modern man's 1500ccs?
19 posted on 01/10/2003 7:43:11 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
"The more we investigate, the older we get."

Yup. Everything is getting older.

20 posted on 01/10/2003 8:46:50 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson