Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
2 hours, 55 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - U.S. and Indian scientists said Wednesday they have discovered a new carnivorous dinosaur species in India after finding bones in the western part of the country.

Photo
AP Photo


Missed Tech Tuesday?
Check out the powerful new PDA crop, plus the best buys for any budget


The new dinosaur species was named Rajasaurus narmadensis, or "Regal reptile from the Narmada," after the Narmada River region where the bones were found.

The dinosaurs were between 25-30 feet long, had a horn above their skulls, were relatively heavy and walked on two legs, scientists said. They preyed on long-necked herbivorous dinosaurs on the Indian subcontinent during the Cretaceous Period at the end of the dinosaur age, 65 million years ago.

"It's fabulous to be able to see this dinosaur which lived as the age of dinosaurs came to a close," said Paul Sereno, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago. "It was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America."

Working with Indian scientists, Sereno and paleontologist Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan reconstructed the dinosaur skull in a project funded partly by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

A model of the assembled skull was presented Wednesday by the American scientists to their counterparts from Punjab University in northern India and the Geological Survey of India during a Bombay news conference.

Scientists said they hope the discovery will help explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and the shifting of the continents — how India separated from Africa, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica and collided with Asia.

The dinosaur bones were discovered during the past 18 years by Indian scientists Suresh Srivastava of the Geological Survey of India and Ashok Sahni, a paleontologist at Punjab University.

When the bones were examined, "we realized we had a partial skeleton of an undiscovered species," Sereno said.

The scientists said they believe the Rajasaurus roamed the Southern Hemisphere land masses of present-day Madagascar, Africa and South America.

"People don't realize dinosaurs are the only large-bodied animal that lived, evolved and died at a time when all continents were united," Sereno said.

The cause of the dinosaurs' extinction is still debated by scientists. The Rajasaurus discovery may provide crucial clues, Sereno said.

India has seen quite a few paleontological discoveries recently.

In 1997, villagers discovered about 300 fossilized dinosaur eggs in Pisdura, 440 miles northeast of Bombay, that Indian scientists said were laid by four-legged, long-necked vegetarian creatures.

Indian scientists said the dinosaur embryos in the eggs may have suffocated during volcanic eruptions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acanthostega; antarctica; australia; catastrophism; crevolist; dino; dinosaurs; godsgravesglyphs; ichthyostega; india; madagascar; narmadabasin; narmadensis; paleontology; rajasaurus; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,841-1,8601,861-1,8801,881-1,900 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: DittoJed2
What makes sense is that mutations tend to have their limits.

Yes, they do. But only in the sense that the mutated offspring of a particular creature can't be all that different from the parent. Quite so. Micro-evolution. But when that process is continued over thousands and millions of generations, those little changes can add up to be a considerable difference. Again, what conceivable mechanism (except extinction) would intervene to prevent this from happening?

1,861 posted on 08/21/2003 10:08:21 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1841 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
The return of the Creator will do it.

If "omnipresent" means what I think it does, He's not supposed to have ever left the building.

1,862 posted on 08/21/2003 10:09:29 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1860 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
I have a feeling we're once again seeing a genuine(?) misunderstanding of what evolution says about how the changes happen.
1,863 posted on 08/21/2003 10:11:16 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1857 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
The return of the Creator will do it.

I think we may safely presume that He will do a better job of explaining why the evidence is the way it is than His proxies have thus far managed to do. In the mean time, we continue plugging away as best we can ;)

1,864 posted on 08/21/2003 10:11:54 AM PDT by general_re (A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1860 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo

Score one for Reason, Ping!


1,865 posted on 08/21/2003 10:16:56 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1808 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Thank you.
1,866 posted on 08/21/2003 10:18:24 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1809 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I hope the information posted has been helpful.
1,867 posted on 08/21/2003 10:19:50 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1812 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
And no other living creature looks like a giraffe, but that doesn't make the giraffe a dinosaur.
1,868 posted on 08/21/2003 10:21:24 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1813 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0821rate.asp

There is the big news, at least as considered by its authors.

1,869 posted on 08/21/2003 10:22:12 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1866 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
you aren't going to have a human (this is gross) having sex with a chimp and have a huepansee.

Of course, that is perfectly consistent with evolution.

That is my definition of "kind".

Before you seemed to say that "kind" referred to "family". Now you say it's "species". But this gets back to why I asked you about bears. Different species of bears can reportedly produce viable offspring with each other...but not always. So how many "kinds" of bear are there?

Then, too, there are many different "kinds" of ant, even within the same colony! They can't all produce viable offspring with each other. It's not a definition that is very easily applied.

Worst of all, it leaves you with the problem of how Noah got all those species of beetles onto the Ark.

You aren't going to have lizards mating with birds and coming up with a transitional species.

That's good, because it would fly in the face of evolution if they could. Once again, you aren't debunking evolution, but rather your misconceptions about it.

1,870 posted on 08/21/2003 10:23:11 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1844 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; DittoJed2
DittoJed2, Amen! to your statement: The return of the Creator will do it.

Vade, without getting into the previous debate again - it is commonly understood by those of us who believe the Bible is inerrant that "all that there is" was made by Jesus Christ (John 1:3) --- i.e. the Father made all things by Jesus (Hebrews 1:2) --- who entered the physical realm once and will return. (Acts 1:11)

The Father and Jesus are One (John 10:30) - Jesus left to return to heaven, so that the Holy Spirit could come (John 16:7)

Hence, with the Trinity - the statement "that He never left the building," and "the Creator will return" are both true.

1,871 posted on 08/21/2003 10:25:27 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1862 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
I think the information has been extremely helpful! And the debate has been very informative!!!

It's been a long time on this forum since these types of arguments have been discussed. And since many conservatives are Christian (and some fundamentalist) it is particularly helpful to Lurkers to see the points and the counter-points presented by other conservatives.

Again, thank you!

1,872 posted on 08/21/2003 10:30:05 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1867 | View Replies]

To: balrog666; Ichneumon
Well, balrog666 just added Menton's name to the list as someone with impecable credentials who is belittled (personally) by the evolution crowd. I revise the post where I say he wasn't attacked. Because he did an experiment with a modern reptile (not the only reason he has for disbelieving scales can become feathers) he is called an "idiot." How nice.
1,873 posted on 08/21/2003 10:30:05 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1840 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Does evolution or does it not postulate that man slowly evolved from apes (or an ape-like ancestor which we share with apes). I believe I have seen a ton of drawings like that.
1,874 posted on 08/21/2003 10:31:59 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1843 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2; f.Christian
Please be aware that many of us are checking off many boxes concerning behavior and attitude from lists established prior to a certain date. The pattern looks very much the same.
1,875 posted on 08/21/2003 10:37:38 AM PDT by AndrewC (The Punch and Judy show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1873 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
If you are going to introduce individual persons as evidence, you have made the argument by definition ad hominem. If you claim X and Y are great scientists and support creationism, then the only reasonable rebuttal is 'X and Y are not great scientists'. I agree ad hominems are in general unacceptable, but if a positive ad hominem is introduced as evidence for a point, a negative ad hominem in rebuttal is only to be expected.

The individual was brought up in response to a specific request that suggested that results can not be argued with and implied the worldview of Darwinism brought about those results. Worldviews are held by people. The person wanted one major medical breakthrough, and I gave her one by a Dr. with a creationist worldview. His breakthrough did not come through as a result of assuming that animals and humans are related.

Regarding the rest of the posts regarding Damadian, they were in response to attacks on him as a "crank" just like Behe is a "joke" and Menton is an "idiot."

Regarding the individuals: Behe's Darwin's Black Box book is unconvincing and sloppy. However, I am familiar with his previous physical chemistry work on DNA, and it was scientifically rigorous. Damadian's 1972 patent does not include an NMR imager as it is understood by either the NMR or the more general imaging community.
Behe's book is unconvincing to some, probably including yourself. I have heard other PhDs say that it is solid work.

Damadian's patent was for a device. He was also the one who apparently built the first machine. The implication was that he was making claims on work that he did not perform. The record shows he was working on the technology, and the Supreme Court backs him up.
1,876 posted on 08/21/2003 10:38:50 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1848 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0821rate.asp

There is the big news, at least as considered by its authors.

It's the same nonsense we demolished about two months ago. It's based on the unfounded assumption that helium diffuses easily in zircons. It doesn't. A recent paper found a activation energy for helium diffusion of 44 kcal/mol., and a closure temperature of 190 C. (The closure temperature is the temperature below which diffusion is negligible). A zircon which has not been exposed to temperatures above 190C should retain its helium.

He diffusion and (U-Th)/He thermochronometry of zircon: initial results from Fish Canyon Tuff and Gold Butte. Reiners, Peter W.; Farley, Kenneth A.; Hickes, Hunter J. Department of Geology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. Tectonophysics (2002), 349(1-4), 297-308.

1,877 posted on 08/21/2003 10:39:05 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1869 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
EXPRESSED DOUBT. EXPRESSED DOUBT. Doesn't say what their whole worldview is, just EXPRESSED DOUBT. Sheesh!!!!
1,878 posted on 08/21/2003 10:40:20 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1854 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; DittoJed2
Jeepers! I forgot to make one other point in post 1871. Sorry about that.

As Creator of ”all that there is” there is nothing of which anything can exist but Himself. Thus, as the Scriptures say in Acts 17:28 “For in him we live, and move, and have our being”

1,879 posted on 08/21/2003 10:41:00 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1871 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Did you here about the new bumper sticker with a pic of hilliary on it ... I luv country music ?
1,880 posted on 08/21/2003 10:41:41 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1875 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,841-1,8601,861-1,8801,881-1,900 ... 3,121-3,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson