A LOT of folks were duped in the 1830's...
...and it's still going on today.
Posted on 06/19/2014 3:36:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I did want to go that far for the point but you are absolutely correct.
Since mindreading is REALLY looked down upon here; it's so much easier if you'd typed what you meant; instead of hoping that others are going to be able to discern your thoughts on the subject.
You may have a hard time finding it if the person was banned.
A LOT of Mittbot's were foaming at the mouth that their chosen heresy was getting so much negative press on FR.
I can remember quite a few that threatened Jim in this manner of finances.
To paraphrase something I've read somewhere:
Romans 11:4
And what was God's answer to him?
"I left to Myself seven thousand men, who did not bow a knee to Baal."
A LOT of folks were duped in the 1830's...
...and it's still going on today.
Like we were gonna hold Mitt's feet to the fire if HE won?
Come on; Everyone knows that all you gotta do is WIN!
77% vs 23% ain't no better than 50.7% vs 49.3%
This only works if typed.
Actually saying it falls WAY short of it’s intent.
You are welcome to search FR to see if I’m not the perfect candidate!
You guys always ask the same questions that have been answered repeatedly.
Did you know you were on a Conservative website ? This ain’t www.IWorshipWillard.com.
Unless she switched parties. You'll vote Socialist so long as it carries the "R" label.
Not really.
Maybe it’s not my posts but your reading comprehension.... ‘Don’t measure your peck in my half bushel!’
Then maybe your perception is warped, period. Go away.
There is some credence to that thought, but keep in mind that while it worked out well with Truman, Eisenhower; Nixon, Ford, Reagan and both Bushes, not so much for JFK, LBJ, and Jimmah Cawttare.
Overall, an understanding of the military really helps a President weigh his decisions with more facts at hand, it’s not a successful solution to all decisions though. Many Governors can learn from overseeing the Guard units in their state, however to make those critical world decisions, it would be better if that leader had the experience and training of our military.
You have this amazing ability to put my thoughts into a coherent logical format saying exactly what I am thinking. Thank-you. If I am ever in the position that I need a ghost writer for my autobiography the job is yours if you want it.
It hasn't always been in the past and it can be electing the best candidate again. It wasn't between Ronaldus and Carter or Mondale. It was between Obastard and McLame, and Mittens, but it does not have to be.
We need to find a candidate with solid conservative principles and the ability to articulate those to the American public.
I agree but there have been some very notable exceptions as I pointed out.
Man you incessantly whine about nothing, its OK to love RINOs like Romney if you want. Others though ....?
RE :”Remember, Dick Cheney knew......it’s a shame you didn’t.”
You mean his support for gay marriage?
No I cant agree with that even if Cheney is on on your side on that issue.
Times are hard. There are surely folks who can't spare even a bit to donate to FR. But to announce your refusal to do so because your poor little feelings got hurt? That's taking whining to a new level. Then to encourage others to donate for you so you can keep using the site...that makes you a deliberate freeloader. That's the polar opposite of how conservatives behave, and I find it disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.