Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Dark Energy, Inflation, & Neutrino Mass News
SDSS Website (via Fermilab) ^ | July 19, 2004 | U. Seljak, P.MacDonald, & G.S. Ruderman

Posted on 07/22/2004 11:10:10 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist

Using observations of 3,000 quasars discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), scientists have made the most precise measurement to date of the cosmic clustering of diffuse hydrogen gas. These quasars--100 times more than have been used in such analyses in the past--are at distances of eight to ten billion light years, making them among the most distant objects known.

Filaments of gas between the quasars and the Earth absorb light in the quasar's spectra, allowing researchers to map the gas distribution and to measure how clumpy the gas is on scales of one million light years. The degree of clumping of this gas, in turn, can answer fundamental questions such as whether neutrinos have mass and what the nature of dark energy is, hypothesized to be driving the accelerated expansion of the universe.

"Scientists have long studied the clustering of galaxies to learn about cosmology," explained Uros Seljak of Princeton University, one of the SDSS researchers. "However, the physics of galaxy formation and clustering is very complicated. In particular, because most of the mass of the universe is made up of dark matter, an uncertainty arises from our lack of understanding of the relation between the distribution of galaxies (which we see) and the dark matter (which we can't see but the cosmological models predict)." The gas filaments seen in the quasar spectra are thought to be distributed very much like the dark matter, removing this source of uncertainty.

"We have known for several years that quasar spectra are a unique tool for studying the distribution of dark matter in the early universe, but the quantity and quality of the SDSS data have made that vision a reality," said David Weinberg of Ohio State University, a member of the SDSS team. "It's amazing that we can learn so much about the structure of the universe 10 billion years ago."

Seljak and his collaborators on the SDSS combined the analysis of the quasar spectra with measurements of galaxy clustering, gravitational lensing, and ripples in the Cosmic Microwave Background observed by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). This gives the best determination to date of the clustering of matter in the universe from scales of one million light years to many billions of light years. This comprensive view allows detailed comparison with theoretical models for the history and constituents of the universe.

"This is the most rigorous test to date of the predictions of the cosmological model of inflation; inflation passes with flying colors," added Seljak.

Inflationary theory states that right after the Big Bang the universe underwent a period of extremely rapid acceleration, during which tiny fluctuations were transformed into astronomical-sized wrinkles in space-time, ultimately observable in the clumping of astronomical objects. The theory of inflation predicts a very specific dependence of the degree of clustering with scale, which the current analysis strongly supports. Other scenarios, such as the cyclic universe theory, make very similar predictions and are also in agreement with the latest results.

Early analyses by the WMAP team and others had hinted at deviations in cosmic clustering from the prediction of inflation. If correct, this would have required a major revision of the current paradigm for origin of structure in the universe.

"The new data and the corresponding analysis substantially improves the observational precision of this test," said Patrick McDonald of Princeton University and one of the finding's authors. "The new results are in nearly perfect agreement with inflation."

"The clustering of matter is a precise and powerful test of cosmological models, and the present analysis is consistent with, and extends our previous studies," agreed Adrian Pope of The Johns Hopkins University, who led an earlier analysis of the clustering of SDSS galaxies.

The new analysis also provides the best information on the mass of the neutrino. Terrestial experiments--resulting in the 2002 Nobel Prize in Physics--have definitively shown that neutrinos have mass, but these experiments could only measure the difference in mass between the three different types of neutrinos known. The presence of neutrinos would affect the cosmic clustering on million-light-year scales, exactly the scales probed with the quasar spectra.

The new analysis suggests that the lightest neutrino mass has to be less than two times the previously measured mass difference. The new measurements also eliminate the possibility of an additional massive neutrino family suggested by some terrestrial experiments.

"Cosmology, the science of the very large, is able to tell us about properties of fundamental particles, such as neutrinos," said Lam Hui of The U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, who has been carrying out an independent analysis of these data, together with Scott Burles of MIT and others.

The new analysis also provides further support for the existence of dark energy, and suggests that dark energy is unchanging in time. This analysis provides the best limits on its time evolution to date.

"No evidence of dark energy changing in time has emerged so far, and the possibility that the universe will be torn apart by a big rip in the future is substantially reduced by these new results," said Alexey Makarov of Princeton University, who also took part in this research.

(Excerpt) Read more at sdss.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: astronomy; cosmology; crevolist; darkmatter; neutrinos; physics; science; space
The original title at Sloan's website was "Cosmic Clumping: Sloan Digital Sky Survey measurements of gas between the galaxies bolsters the case for inflation and dark energy, and improves the case limiting neutrino mass " Needless to say, that was too long, so I had to use the title Fermilab used in its News Archive list. Click on the source link the see some neat graphics, as well as the list of contributors.
1 posted on 07/22/2004 11:10:11 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
...and the possibility that the universe will be torn apart by a big rip in the future is substantially reduced by these new results," said Alexey Makarov

Whew!, Boy,I'm so relieved!......

2 posted on 07/22/2004 11:13:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (I coulda' swore we elected a Republican President last time.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I guess nobody has told you about proton decay yet...


3 posted on 07/22/2004 11:20:40 AM PDT by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alnitak

OH NO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O! NOT PROTON DECAY!
OH, MY GAWD! WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO? WHEREVER SHALL WE GO?


Frankly, my dear........


4 posted on 07/22/2004 11:27:58 AM PDT by Red Badger (I coulda' swore we elected a Republican President last time.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
Filaments of gas between the quasars and the Earth absorb light in the quasar's spectra, allowing researchers to map the gas distribution and to measure how clumpy the gas is on scales of one million light years.

I presume they've got some means of accounting for the motion of the gas filaments over millions of years.... Otherwise, you have to wonder about their conclusions.

5 posted on 07/22/2004 11:31:13 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer

Ping


6 posted on 07/22/2004 11:36:29 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Ni Jesus, Ni Marx..OUI REAGAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Science list Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
7 posted on 07/22/2004 11:48:48 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (#26,303, never suspended, over 187 threads posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
No evidence of dark energy changing in time has emerged so far, and the possibility that the universe will be torn apart by a big rip in the future is substantially reduced by these new results

Bummer. I was hoping that a big rip was in our future. Then, assuming a mechanism exists for quenching the expansion, the rip that destroys our universe (which was used up anyway, by that time) would become the inflation that creates the next universe. But as I always say, the universe is the way it is, and not how I would wish it to be.

8 posted on 07/22/2004 12:42:14 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Did you notice Max Tegmark's name amongst the contributors to the paper?


9 posted on 07/22/2004 12:52:57 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Ni Jesus, Ni Marx..OUI REAGAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
OH NO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O! NOT PROTON DECAY! OH, MY GAWD! WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO?

Hmm...use Creem Toothpaste! It sweeten the breath, then you eat all those beautiful models....MPFC :))

10 posted on 07/22/2004 3:45:00 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Physicist; RightWingAtheist
assuming a mechanism exists for quenching the expansion, the rip that destroys our universe (which was used up anyway, by that time) would become the inflation that creates the next universe.

"what was old, is new again"...thanks. :/

11 posted on 07/22/2004 3:49:59 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

Big Crunchy placemarker.


12 posted on 07/22/2004 7:10:15 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (#26,303, over 187 threads posted, and somehow never suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 07/22/2004 7:44:57 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

Thanks for the ping. :-)

Sorry I am a bit late for the party. :-(


14 posted on 07/24/2004 5:49:59 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

No prob :-)


15 posted on 07/24/2004 9:33:42 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson