Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viking Burial Site Found in England
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS via NY Times ^ | September 7, 2004 | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 09/07/2004 7:53:26 AM PDT by 68skylark

LONDON (AP) -- Archaeologists in northwestern England have found a burial site of six Viking men and women, complete with swords, spears, jewelry, fire-making materials and riding equipment, officials said Monday.

The site, discovered near Cumwhitton, is believed to date to the early 10th century, and archaeologists working there called it the first Viking burial ground found in Britain.

The only other known Viking cemetery was found in Ingleby east of Cumwhitton. It was excavated in the 1940s, but the bodies had been cremated and not buried.

Local metal specialist Peter Adams made the find at the end of March and reported it to the Portable Antiquities Scheme, which is run by the Museums, Libraries and Archive Council.

``This is tremendous news, a unique discovery which will improve people's understanding of the area and its history,'' council chairman Mark Wood said.

The Vikings, inhabitants of Scandinavia from 800 to 1100, traded with, and raided, much of Europe, often settling there. They invaded and conquered England in 1013.

The burial ground was unearthed when Adams found two copper brooches. The grave of a Viking woman was found underneath, and further excavation led to the discovery of the graves of another woman and four men.

Among the items found in the graves were weapons, spurs, a bridle and a drinking horn, as well as a jet bracelet and a copper alloy belt fitting.

Adams described it as ``the find of a lifetime.''

Rachel Newman, of Oxford Archaeology North, said: ``We could not have expected more from the excavation of the site.

``We knew the brooches found by Mr. Adams came from a burial of a Viking Age woman, which was exciting and of great importance in itself. But we did not expect to find five other graves complete with such a splendid array of artifacts. It truly has been an amazing few months excavating this extremely important Viking Age site.''

Arts Minister Estelle Morris said: ``We should all be grateful to Mr. Adams, who recorded his find so promptly. As a result, the experts have been able to learn more about this fascinating site and uncover the secrets of a time capsule more than 1,000 years old.''

Some of the items found were to be shown Tuesday at the Tullie House Museum and Art Gallery in the nearby city of Carlisle.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; archaeology; britain; canute; cumwhitton; danelaw; england; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; knut; svein; thevikings; viking; vikings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: TomB
Vikings (singing) Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam ... spam, spam, spam, spam ... lovely spam, wonderful spam ...
Waitress Shut up. Shut up! Shut up! You can't have egg, bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
21 posted on 09/07/2004 8:10:26 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I'm not familiar with what happened in 1013 -- does anyone have a little backgroung information to share?

Just off the top of my head, I believe any "conquest" of "England" by the Norse took place over several centuries, culminating in Danish rule over the greater part of what is now England in the early 11th century. By the time of the Norman conquest, Anglo-Saxon rule had been re-established, although the Danes were still contesting for the kingdom right up until the very eve of the Conquest.

22 posted on 09/07/2004 8:11:26 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("This house is sho' gone crazy!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
King Swein of Denmark (with his son Cnut) sailed up the rivers Humber and Trent to be accepted as king in the Danelaw.

Thanks for the background. From what you describe, none of these rules claimed to be on a secret mission to sail up rivers they never entered, or claimed to take friendly fire from drunken revelers during some pagan festival. Such things were never seared into their memories. That was back when candidates had some class.

23 posted on 09/07/2004 8:15:36 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Welcome :-).


24 posted on 09/07/2004 8:16:04 AM PDT by Tax-chick (The Notorious North Carolina Niceness Nazi ... Beware the Molasses Miasma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

LOL - just ordinary invaders, taking what they could get without apology. Scandinavia was overpopulated, odd as that seems nowadays.


25 posted on 09/07/2004 8:17:06 AM PDT by Tax-chick (The Notorious North Carolina Niceness Nazi ... Beware the Molasses Miasma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

You know how they knew they were Vikings? None of them had Super Bowl rings.


26 posted on 09/07/2004 8:21:07 AM PDT by ekyjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
The interesting thing about Svein Forkbeard... he built the invasion force (it wasn't as casual and la-dee-dah as just sailing up a couple of rivers) over a period of twenty years, with barracks, drills, the fleet, etc. Then he up and died. The Vikings were a scourge, but they weren't just a bunch of berserkers. :')

In 1066, at Stamford Bridge, Harold II (the King of England, successor to Edward the Confessor) rode up to parley with Tostig and the Norwegian King Harald Hardrada (one of the various spellings), who is probably high on the list of anyone's Quintessential Vikings. As he rode off, Harald asked who that was. "Harold of England". The Viking was impressed, not least because all he'd been offered was "six feet of English ground, or whatever additional is required for his height" (part of Harald's fame was his great size) by some guy on a horse.

The battle that ensued ended the lives of Tostig and Hardrada, and ended the period of large scale invasion by Viking armies -- with the exception of William the Conqueror (Usurper), whose ancestry was Scandinavian (Norman / Norseman / Northmen), and who would lead the forces which killed Harold II and ended the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms less that three weeks later.

27 posted on 09/07/2004 8:22:13 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

"They're still using "England" in an anachronistic usage, to some extent ... Ethelraed's kingdom wasn't exactly a united polity, as was demonstrated in the runup to 1066."

In fact, arguably, the 9th-century viking immigration/invasion of what became the danelaw, and the subsequent expulsion of danelaw rule from those areas by alfred and his descendents, in fact contributed greatly to earlier consolidation of the nominal rule of the major kingdoms that would have otherwise been the case.


28 posted on 09/07/2004 8:22:51 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
...just ordinary invaders, taking what they could get without apology.

Ah, the good old days. Things were so much simpler then.

29 posted on 09/07/2004 8:22:58 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meandog

And, the greatest long-snapper in the history of the game, Mike Morris, # 68...


30 posted on 09/07/2004 8:23:36 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Yeah, death is always simple ...


31 posted on 09/07/2004 8:29:59 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Antibiotics, anesthesia, air conditioning ... requirements for civilized life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

well actually the Vikings invaded a lot earlier -- they started around the 8th century and set up Danelaw in northern England right up to London. They were also based in Ireland around what is now Dublin. By the 10th century the British Isles were part of King CAnute's Empire which covered most of Scandanavia as well as other parts of north western europe.


32 posted on 09/07/2004 8:30:48 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Excellent point.


33 posted on 09/07/2004 8:31:18 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Antibiotics, anesthesia, air conditioning ... requirements for civilized life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Did they find John Kerry's service records?


34 posted on 09/07/2004 8:31:32 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Viking Burial Site Found in England

It was an extremely large mound with Nodic inscription on it which translated to "Metrodome."

35 posted on 09/07/2004 8:32:21 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kerry Kool-Aid: Changes flavors with every sip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Argh!

Nodic = Nordic.

Or maybe not.

36 posted on 09/07/2004 8:34:03 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kerry Kool-Aid: Changes flavors with every sip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Darkchylde

Ping


37 posted on 09/07/2004 8:35:07 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Save a Democrat! Vote Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Nor did the Vikings "conquer England" at any point, since there was no "England" to conquer, only a group of warring kingdoms of various ethnic backgrounds.

England is merely the land of the Angles (though, naturally I prefer Pope Gregory's pun), history generally considers King Egbert to be the first 'King of All England' following his defeat of Beornwulf of Mercia in 825, he was proclaimed Bretwalda (ruler of Britain) in 829. He was the grandfather of King Alfred the Great, who did bring a large element of unity to the country.

Obviously England was not as united then as it is now, but we were certainly way down the line in the creation of a single state. Remember that the Greece of antiquity was a set of warring city-states.
38 posted on 09/07/2004 8:35:51 AM PDT by tjwmason (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomB

Spam, Eggs, Spam and Spam.

(sausage indeed!)


39 posted on 09/07/2004 8:37:30 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Hey Tax-chick, it was good to see you and the Tax-chickadees at Matthews this weekend...spreading conservative Christian homeschool entropy in your wake. :)

Look at Scandinavia a thousand years after the heyday of the Vikings. Now they're the quintessential modern European socialist weenie countries...crushing taxation, cradle-to-grave welfare socialism, liberal sexual mores causing the breakdown of the family, and lax immigration policies that are leading them toward their own little Muslim intifadas. Where's the heirs to the Vikings when you really need them?

}:-)4


40 posted on 09/07/2004 8:42:26 AM PDT by Moose4 (I'm a compassionate conservative. I feel lots of pity for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson