Posted on 10/31/2005 9:55:26 AM PST by Richard Poe
"No free speech for fascists!" screamed two burly ruffians as they charged the stage where David Horowitz was attempting to speak. "I probably would have suffered some bodily harm," Horowitz later wrote on his blog. Luckily, he writes, about half a dozen supporters "sprang to my rescue and beat the living crap out of the two deserving reds, dragging them unceremoniously from the theater." (1)
Mr. Horowitz was fortunate. But he remains a target. We now know that the October 21 attack at the Liberty Film Festival in Los Angeles was no random event. It is part of a wider effort, orchestrated by the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP).
The RCP's so-called "World Can't Wait!" campaign seeks to intimidate conservatives through thuggery.
Screenshot of the hit list posted on the Web site of the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP). At least two people on the list — one of them David Horowitz — have been subjected to aggressive physical harassment by operatives of the RCP's "World Can't Wait!" campaign. |
On its Web site, the RCP has published a hit list of nine prominent conservatives whom it deems "Nazis" or "fascists", deserving of special odium. David Horowitz appears on the list, as does Berkeley law professor John Choon Yoo.
Charles Clark Kissinger of the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) |
RCP thugs invaded Professor Yoo's classroom last week, on October 26, forcing him to flee. The perpetrators later boasted of their achievement on their blog. (3)
The nine names on the RCP hit list are: Ann Coulter; Lieutenant General William G. “Jerry” Boykin; David Horowitz; Pat Robertson; William Bennett [pdf file]; Louisiana National Guard Brigadier General Gary Jones [pdf file]; Barbara Bush [pdf file]; Congressman Richard Baker [pdf file] and Berkeley law professor John Choon Yoo, in that order.
The World Can't Wait! campaign appears to be the brainchild of one Charles Clark Kissinger, a former SDS leader who today serves as a high-level organizer in the Revolutionary Communist Party. (4) Kissinger created the anti-war coalition Not in Our Name, which is working closely with the World Can't Wait! campaign.
The attacks on Horowitz and Yoo are just the beginning. Kissinger's World Can't Wait! network plans a nationwide mobilization beginning November 2 — the first anniversary of George W. Bush's alleged theft of the 2004 election (yes, they claim he stole that election too).
For more background on the RCP's November 2 mobilization, go here.
_________________________
NOTES
1. David Horowitz, "Fascist Attack in Hollywood", FrontPageMagazine.com, October 24, 2005; Posted by "Tony", "Two World Can't Wait! LA Organizers Ambush Horowitz at Reactionary `Liberty Film Festival'", YouthDriveOutBush.blogspot.com, October 24, 2005
2. John Yoo, "Commentary: Behind the `Torture Memos'", UC Berkeley News, January 4, 2005
3. Posted by "drive out bush regime", "Berkeley Students/Activists Disrupt John Yoo Class", YouthDriveOutBush.blogspot.com, October 27, 2005
4. Profile: C. Clark Kissinger, DiscovertheNetworks.org
By definition they are all political offshoots of 19th century materialism.
For those who are not as well read (such as myself)on the 19th century roots of communism and fascism, would you please explain "materialism."
Bump!
They're dingbats, alright...and more blowhard than threats....at least, personally. Oh, sure, they'll rabblerouse and probably get a few of the weaker minded hangers-on to do the dirty work. But, the rank and file cadre'...all 2 dozen...are usually more yellow than Red.
Obviously, the thugs are exceptionally stupid. Calling David Horowitz a Nazi, is patently ridiculous.
Read this thread.
You're beginning to see what I alluded to.
Thank you for your consideration for me, here and privately. FMCDH(BITS)
FMCDH(BITS)
You're most welcome. :-)
Many thanks! :-)
That head shot of Charles Clark Kissinger is missing something. But what?.Oh I know contusions!
There are many on this forum who are seriously mentally ill, no doubt about it. Who want to see destruction of what makes human civilization human.
I'm wondering about this part of your comments, did you leave something out, or maybe you could clarify:
"...Liberalism is the emphasis on providing the material needs of man (food water, clothing) where as Conservatism is the emphasis of the material needs of man (Freedom, opportunity, excellence ect)."
Yah, that was a typo:
Liberal: Materialist emphisis of Man
Conservative: Spiritual emphisis on Man.
>>RCP thugs invaded Professor Yoo's classroom last week, on October 26, forcing him to flee. <<
I won't flee, so bring it on here.
Thanks! I though that's what you meant; I figured the lurkers needed it spelled out for them!
The Commie-guy. . . shouldn't he be spending his energy on combating that case of goiter.
Just now had time to respond. Wow, I appreciate your response VERY much. I went to your links. I have gotten my understanding of the origins of the leftist mindset sharpened considerably. I think you are right on in your analysis.
You mentioned the occult. I agree with you. Especially if we factor in - here's where I may lose you, so many discount what they label "tin hat" theories - the influence of the occult on "intellectual" Europe back then: such things as Grand Orient Masonry and Adam Wisehaupt's schemes.
I have read the historian Nesta Websters books. She wrote extensively along these lines. Her book "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements" is quite an eye opener.
Hegel's dialectic philosphy of the material vs the spiritual, I now see, also play a big role in this. Which in turn, provided the basis for Marx materialism. The "19th century materialism" you spoke of. Truth be known, Both Hegel and Marx were probably influenced by occultic thinking to some degree. According to Webster, it was the rage in Europe for "intellectuals" back then, apparently.
Frederick the Great, Adam Wisehaupt, Cabalists, Grand Orient Masonry, the Jacobites, Socialism, Hegel, Marx and Engel,the Bolsheviks and Communism, Nazism, "liberalism," and our present day Democrat party, in my opinion, are peas of the same pod. Materialists, yes, all of them. Pantheists or anti-Theists.
And though some of them, like the atheist Marxists, would discount the spiritual, in my view, they are also spiritualists. Of the evil side, the occultic side, of the "spiritual," however.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.