Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects Obama case
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf ^

Posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment

too bad


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 911truth; bho; birthcertificate; blackhelicopters; certifigate; cfr; choomgang; colb; conspiracy; conspiracytheories; conspiracytheorists; conspiracytheory; deathofthewest; donofrio; lawsuit; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; pok; ronpaul; ruling; scotus; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,041-1,059 next last
To: snowsislander

The “natural born citizen” requirement is now another Constitutional dead letter.


141 posted on 12/08/2008 7:48:34 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taichi
I don’t know that I want SCOTUS deciding elections

What I want is for SCOTUS to decide if a candidate cheated. If that candidate cheated, as far as I'm concerned, they already dicided the election themselves prior to the vote.

142 posted on 12/08/2008 7:48:34 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: America2012
Not to mention:


Georgian

143 posted on 12/08/2008 7:49:35 AM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
Will be watching the Press Conference today at 1:00 at the Washington Press Club.

DONOFRIO NOT INVOLVED WITH NATIONAL PRESS CLUB EVENT ON DEC. 8, 2008. ALL REPORTS STATING I WILL BE AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB ON MON DECEMBER 8, 2008 ARE FALSE.

144 posted on 12/08/2008 7:49:47 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk

“As to the birth certificate, Hillary checked this in January (remember the State workers fired for looking in the files) and presumably came up with nothing. “

I suspect both hillary and the mccain campaigns probably know exactly what his BC said/was, but I do NOT think the mccain campaign could every have used this if he was not born in hawaii, the media would in turn have crucified mccain for being born in panama (not the canal zone) and essentially depicted the issue as one of moral equivalence.


145 posted on 12/08/2008 7:50:49 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

As I said elsewhere.......

Great. Now nutroots on the right are as apoplectic about the SCOTUS decision IRT OHB as the nutroots on the left were about Bush v. Gore.

Time to by stock in the companies that produce Paxil, Zolof, etc, etc.


146 posted on 12/08/2008 7:50:52 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I agree. Just read the new case here in Washington State. Brings up the Soetoro divorce case which mentions two children indicating that Soetoro did indeed adopt Barry and that Barry never legally changed his name to BHO. It makes some other very interesting points. Each suit I read gets stronger and stronger. And, ever since November 4th, BO just looks sicker and sicker. He knows the clock is ticking on something.


147 posted on 12/08/2008 7:53:19 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

148 posted on 12/08/2008 7:53:28 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viet Vet in Augusta GA

Only thing worse then an OBot is people who say “I told you so.”


149 posted on 12/08/2008 7:53:54 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viet Vet in Augusta GA

Well heck, why don’t we just throw out the whole Constitution. Hey fella, we’re moving right on to communism. I guess that’s no big deal with you.

My question to you is this, is there anything about the Constitution you are willing to fight for?


150 posted on 12/08/2008 7:54:10 AM PST by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

What I want is for SCOTUS to decide if a candidate cheated.
*******************************************

Actually an excellent way to put it.


151 posted on 12/08/2008 7:54:18 AM PST by Taichi (Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander; wndawmn666; Grampa Dave; Buckarow; PhilDragoo; SE Mom; LucyT; Windflier; ...

Donofrio said numerous times his paperwork was sloppy because he was so rushed. I still think the NBC issue is not dead.

Each NEW case learns from the last. Unfortunately, 15 December rapidly approaches...

Good to have Ron Paul and three Electors part of the Keyes case.

Also, there’s still a massive push to get Electors to demand further verification on the BC issue


152 posted on 12/08/2008 7:54:23 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taking Congress back in 2010
I wouldn't TRUST anyone at this point. While this whole eligibility issue may sound crazy to many (as is being promoted by all the Left Wing sites), this entire issue could have been finished with if Obama had released the original certificate.

This rejection by the Supreme Court is further evidence that Obama and the powers behind him can do anything or take any action they want without consequences.

Your name, at this point, seems far more nutty then anyone who questions the birth certificate/citizenship issue.

153 posted on 12/08/2008 7:55:39 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: LS
Yep. Anyone who thought the birth certificate thing was going anywhere was positively looney. It's the same crowd that barked for years in the 1990s, "If the people only KNOW x, y, z about Clinton, they'll impeach him/throw him out/his popularity will fall." Nope.

During the Clarence Thomas hearings, I upset some Democrats when I told them "I do not believe any of Anita Hill's charges. And even if I was convinced that EVERY SINGLE ONE of her charges were proven true, I would still support Clarence Thomas, because I want somebody of his ideology on the Supreme Court."

The people who voted for him DO NOT CARE. They want a Democrat running the US and pushing the Dem agenda. They do not care about something they probably consider an arcane technicality.

Put another way, if they cared about a strict observance of the Constitution, then they would be Republicans.

154 posted on 12/08/2008 7:55:44 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Question O-thority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I feel like kicking a hole through the wall.


155 posted on 12/08/2008 7:55:54 AM PST by this is my country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
However, I am starting to realize that the SCOTUS doesn’t want to act as an investigative body....

There job is not to investigate, that is the job of the accuser; to bring the evidence before them.

156 posted on 12/08/2008 7:56:00 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

If you want off the “THIS ISSUE IS A DEAD HORSE” ping list let me know ....


157 posted on 12/08/2008 7:56:36 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Have no fear there are at least 15 others out there.

How are they different than this one? Why will they have any better chance of getting a hearing?

Remember this is all about standing. Do any of the 15 plaintiffs have a better claim for standing?

158 posted on 12/08/2008 7:57:16 AM PST by CharacterCounts (1984 was supposed to be a work of fiction, not a how-to manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LS
Long before and will continue long after.

With a President with dual loyalties will come his policies. If you think that you will be successful in contesting his policies without first contesting his eligibility to implement those policies, you have rude awakening ahead of you.

159 posted on 12/08/2008 7:57:47 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

No surprise here.


160 posted on 12/08/2008 7:57:59 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,041-1,059 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson