Posted on 11/03/2009 11:45:42 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
SANTA ANA, Calif., Nov. 3 /Christian Newswire/ -- While many people continue to believe in Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, a group of scientists will present overwhelming scientific evidence against Darwin's speculations.
"If Charles Darwin knew 150 years ago what we know today, he likely would not have published Origin of the Species," said John Baumgardner, Ph.D., whose organization, Logos Research Associates, will lead the two-day "Darwin Was Wrong" conference Nov. 13-14 at Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa.
"We can perhaps excuse Darwin, given his ignorance about the true complexity of living organisms and about genetics," said Dr. Baumgardner, a geophysicist whose career was as research scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M. "Today's knowledge of molecular biology, however, has made Darwin's imagined single-cell-organism-to-man evolution indefensible."
Seven Ph.D scientists will highlight Darwin’s mistakes from genetics, geology, molecular biology, paleontology and other science areas.
Geneticist John Sanford, Ph.D., will show where Darwin went wrong with natural selection. "It is amazing to me that in this 'year of Darwin,' the whole world is bowing down to this man even while modern science is proving him wrong on all fronts," said Dr. Sanford, vice president of Logos and inventor of the world-famous "gene gun" while a Cornell professor in the 1980s. "Natural selection happens but it does not do what Darwin needed it to do. Darwin built a worldview that has come to be the governing paradigm of the intellectual community; that worldview is now collapsing in the face of new advances in science."
Another Logos founding scientist, geologist Steven A. Austin, Ph.D., has traveled to southern Argentina to document Darwin's geological mistakes. "Let nobody confuse you -- Darwin was a geologist, but he was wrong about geology," said Dr. Austin, who just returned from leading a Geological Society of America field trip to Mount St. Helens, Wash., where volcanic eruptions in 1980 and 1982 formed in just hours what many geologists had thought took much longer to form. "Mount St. Helens proved these changes can occur in days - not millions or billions of years."
Other conference speakers include:
Dr. Charles Ware, president of Crossroads Bible College, Indianapolis, Ind., and a chaplain for the Indiana Pacers basketball and Indianapolis Colts football teams, who will show Darwin's errors regarding race and the legacy of racial conflict;
Pastor Chuck Smith, senior pastor and teacher at Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa, who will address how Darwin was wrong about God.
Robert Carter, Ph.D., a marine biologist, who will discuss Darwin’s mistakes regarding the complexity of life and the origin of man;
Jerry Bergman, Ph.D., a biologist who has recently written a book called The Slaughter of the Dissidents that details the automatic expulsion from academic circles of those who criticize or question evolution. He will show how Darwin was wrong about the so-called tree of life, one of evolution's major icons;
Marcus Ross, Ph.D., a paleontologist who will address Darwin's errors regarding the fossil record;
Thomas McMullen, Ph.D., who will demonstrate how Darwin was wrong about science.
For further information, call Jim Pamplin, Logos founder and administrator, at (714) 425-9474; or Dick McDonald, (909) 636-9495.
Ditto my last.
I know. You remain a coward and a fraud.
I have asked you numerous times if Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.
For anyone who cares to learn more about Buck W. (that includes you, Buck W.) you can read about him HERE.
Second verse, same as the first!
Have you no shame?
Yes, they start with the affirmation that the Bible is literally true, then they interpret the Bible in a narrow way, and then they set out to “prove” its truth by nitpicking real science.
I know, all sciency stuff is debunked by guys like your favorite sciency writer.
Whole fields of science wiped away by administration types.
...and Man walked the Earth with 100+ species of large man eating dinosaurs....
Your über-scientific conclusion of my second link shows your ignorance. Maybe you should stick with administration stuff and leave the science to those that don’t have the belief that Man walked the Earth with man eating dinosaurs “because they think a book told them so”
Wow....you responded with a whole lot of nothing. Hold on a moment while I put on my surprised look ;op
I don’t have to profess anything to you or anyone else. I belong to the Roman Catholic Church, the world’s largest Christian religion.
Oh, by the way, evolution is perfectly compatible with Catholicism.
Well done, GGG.
I have never claimed to belonging to any particular Christian denomination. Am I Roman Catholic? Perhaps. Episcopalian? Maybe. But I am a Christian, and I will not give you the satisfaction of submitting to your rectal exam to assess the TRVE NATVRE of my faith.
GGG’s two methods:
The Old Testament
The New Testament
==I’ve seen you use this argument against Buck W. before
Exposing a wolf in sheep’s clothing is not an “argument.”
==So how about if I ask it: please post two actual methods of science used by Creation scientists, with a synopsis of why they are superior to the corresponding methods that the “evo-athiests” use.
Go back and reread the exchange again, and you will see that I was mocking a certain FReeper’s condescention. The scientific method is the scientific method, and the data is the data, for both sides. Where creationists and evolutionists differ is on interpretation. And when it comes to interpretation, both Creation and ID (in that order) are far superior than Darwin’s evo-religious creation myth.
Again GGG has shown his complete ignorance of anything scientific.
You have NEVER show ANY Scientific proof for your view.
Where is the data????
Only a God-hating satanist or evo-atheist would equate being asked if they profess Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior with a rectal exam. Get behind me imposter!
How many times does it take for the evos on FR to get such a simple concept through their heads? Creationists, evos, and IDers are all using the same data. The difference between us involves the most important aspect of science, which is the interpretation of the data. Of course, this is where Creationists and IDers leave the evos in the dust.
Only a pseudo-Christian side-show huckster cultist would demand credentials to verify Christianity.
You are no Christian. You are a self-serving fraud.
“The difference between us involves the most important aspect of science, which is the interpretation of the data. Of course, this is where Creationists and IDers leave the evos in the dust.”
Interpretation of the data? Why do you bother with data when you already know the conclusion?
This isn’t science, it’s rationalization.
Basing a belief in a young earth on faith is commendable, but you defile the Christian faith by lying about scientific evidence that supports such creation.
I bet you don’t even believe your own bullsh!t. You’re a Robert Tilton wannabe.
You’re a contemptible fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.