Just one more....HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW: The Zapruder Film and the Shot that Missed

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/scearce.htm ^ | November 27th, 2007 | Kenneth R. Scearce

[ReaganÜberAlles]

A newly published theory (2007) about the Kennedy assassination demands that we re-examine the Zapruder film, more closely than ever before.

[politicianslie]

If the fatal shot(s) came from the front, how are Gov. Connolly's wounds explained? Connally was hit by two bullets from the Dal-Tex Building.

There is no reason to believe that Connally was hit by bullets fired from anywhere other than the TSBD. This video shows why that is true.

John Connally told you WHEN he was shot in the back

Connally made TWO significant movements exactly when other evidence shows shots were fired. At those moments, the two shots match the TSBD signatures.

4.8 seconds BEFORE JFK is shot in the head (frame 224), John Connally throws up his arms snaps his head to his left and then turns to look over his right shoulder. He was not shot in the back until later

JFK is shot in the head at Z frame 313

0.7 seconds AFTER JFK is shot in the head, Connally is bent over (starts at Z325). You have been told this movement is Nellie pulling John Connally over into her lap. THAT is obviously not true. Connally's head snaps down as he is violently thrown forward (he says the force of the bullet bent him over). This movement has never before been tied to the moment Connally is shot in the back.

Search all you want but you will not find another source that ties this movement by Connally to the bullet that hit him in the back. The US government's lies have been that good even though many of them have been very poor but it was the only hand they had to play.

The reason the US government has been able to pull this scam off for decades is that most citizens (and definitely the lap dog media presstitutes) buy most everything the US gubermint tells them.

Remember Connally reacted 4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds AFTER JFK was shot in the head? This next figure shows the second way we can determine the time between shots.

You of course immediately noticed that the timing of Connally's reactions in the Zapruder film of 4.8 seconds BEFORE and 0.7 Seconds AFTER JFK's head shot is the same as the timing of the last three shots in the acoustical analysis of the Dallas police radio broadcast recording. At this point I've been told by others that 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds being in BOTH the Zapruder film and on the Dallas police recording are just a coincidence! (Yes, there really are Americans stupid enough to believe that could be true). To believe in coincidence, you have to believe the audio experts picked 4.8 and 0.7 seconds from random noise. What is the probability of that happening? There isn't a chance in he[]!

At this point, I've been told that it is impossible for Governor Connally to have been shot so far from the TSBD as the angle would be too shallow to have hit his left thigh. As pointed out earlier, Gov. Connally reacted twice, not all of his wounds were caused by a single bullet as the JFK "experts" all bought hook, line and sinker.

Now as you watch Daddy Bush laugh at the lone gunman scenario that Ford and others pawned off on the world, it should make more sense why he was laughing at Americans. They really are so easy to BS.

Daddy Bush smiling about the lone gunman who killed JFK

I want daddy Bush to know before he dies that his part in the JFK assassination is going to be exposed.

[BeadCounter]

As I have heard before, people see the shots like in a war movie or Western. It doesn’t always work that way and we’ve seen people get shot a million times on TV.

Per your earlier post mentioning I believe a watermelon, people should envision say shooting a pumpkin on a post from 60 yards. How it is going to react is not that predictable. It could do a few things. And the physics may not be that open and shut.

Too, fragments were found on the President’s brain, the bullet may “defrag” so to speak rather than what I said explosion. There is real gun terminology in such debate.

At the least, it is clear that a shooting is not going to always happen as we might see it on TV.

[politicianslie]

The known laws of physics:

This video addresses the momentum of the bullet that hit Connally in the back. Connally said the force of the blow to his back bent him over. None of this "mystery" will make sense until you understand exactly when Gov Connally was shot in the back.

Momentum knocking Gov Connally over when he was shot in the back, one of the biggest secrets the US government has ever hidden

The gubermint has been winning the game because they kept the world arguing about a silly single bullet theory when in actuality there is a reasonable explanation right in front of everyone. The US gubermint learned decades ago that if it can hide the truth about the murder of a US President, then it can tell any lie it needs to. When Hussein Obama looked right at America and lied about Benghazi and his Odumbocare, do you think he was worried? The US presstitutes couldn't figure out the color of the sky unless the Ministry of Truth tells them the answer. The presstitutes think their job is to explain the gubermint's explanations to the idiot citizens when their real job is to expose lies told by the gubermint.

[AppyPappy]

It still doesn’t answer how you could hide someone shooting. People would see the shooter.

[musicman]

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[BeadCounter]

This is from the WARREN REPORT not a Conspiracy book.

“Mr Ball :
Where was the direction of the sound?

Mr Lovelady :
Right there around that concrete little deal on that knoll.”

http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=14148

I think people familiar with this case already knew you have a number of witnesses who heard something, you have a number of witnesses who say they saw a puff of smoke from areas other than the Texas Schoolbook Depository.

From Pro-Warren Report website McAdams:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm

HSCA meaning House Select Committee on Assassinations pie chart on that page.

There is a pie chart like this for the Warren Report which I don’t know where it is. I believe it had more people who thought they heard something from the Grassy Knoll area.

“Mr. BALL - Did you see any activity in this high ground above Elm after the shot?
Mr. BOWERS - At the time of the shooting there seemed to be some commotion,”

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/bowers.htm

There is plenty to read in the 24 volumes of the Warren Report.

[AppyPappy]

Commotion. I would think an assassination would warrant a bit more than a commotion.

[Windflier]

Single sourcing the concept of head movement from a “movie of official reference” is the first error of the lay public, which does provide significant profits for the leftist conspiracy nuts.

I don't need a so-called 'expert' to explain what I've seen with my own two eyes. Especially when said 'expert' is trying to convince me that the simple display of physics I've just witnessed was caused by a force which runs exactly opposite to the known laws of the universe.

What you're selling sounds precisely like the doublespeak libs have been thrusting down our throats for generations:

"Your health care plan wasn't cancelled - it was upgraded!"

Utter bs.

[21twelve]

Our local 24-hour news station had a special where it aired the actual news coverage from a sister station in Dallas. Started off with the coverage of the plane landing and the meet and greet.

Then it had some fashion talk show that was interrupted for the news that the president had been shot. And they had a family there sitting at a table. Mom, dad, and two young kids (the “Newmans” is a guess at what I remember).

Anyway, the man was quite clear that the shots came from what later became known as the “grassy knoll”.

And what he said next was odd. IIRC it was something like:

“Well, and lots of people ran up there - so I hope they catch this guy. And don’t kill him, so then we know about what is going on.”

At first when he started to say “not kill him” I thought it might be because of some Christian/forgiveness, etc. feelings the guy had. But then he talks about “knowing what is going on”.

[BeadCounter]

How about a photo showing people were running to the Grassy Knoll??

[21twelve]

http://www.nwcn.com/news/idaho?fId=233014021&fPath=/home&fDomain=10227

Here is a link to the first half hour of the coverage. Starts off with a speech by Kennedy, then the plane landing, then the News Bulletin.

I found it interesting how much coverage his coming to Dallas got. But I suppose it was a combination of airplanes and TV’s being still fairly new??? (Obama comes into our town and it gets a minute on the evening news).

[BeadCounter]

Thank you so much, I will read all of this tonight.

[AppyPappy]

It appears the cop is running to the street. During a shooting, it is best to take cover.
I don’t see anyone on the knoll with a rifle.

[21twelve]

Listening to it a few more times again he says “I hope he lives. I hope he lives so he can regret what he did”. My apologies for adding my conspiracy thoughts to it. Although both he and the newscaster talk about all the cops and people heading towards the wall and railyard.

[21twelve]

The photo on post 130 shows the photo of the Newman family that was interviewed on the link I posted. She says how after the shots were fired and she saw the President’s blood she fell on top of her baby.

The husband said the first shot was when the President was “startled” and jumped up in his seat (the neck shot). The head shot happened right in front of him.

[nikos1121]

Tell you what. FIrst off did you read Vince Bugliosi’s book? Did you watch the NOVA documentary? did you read the JAMA autopsy and interview of the pathologists?

If not then I rest my case. Bugliosi refutes EVERY SINGLE CONPIRACY THEORY AS HE WOULD AS A TRIAL LAWYER.

What’s more, why would conspirators use a bumbling idiot like Oswald, whom the Kremlin recognized that the guy was unstable and incompetent.

The left would love to have what you say proven. They can’t believe a communist would kill a democratic president.

[BeadCounter]

Running to the street towards the grassy knoll. The 24 volumes of the Warren Report are there for everyone to read. You just quoted one excerpt lately. If you don’t care to read it in depth, that’s your choice.

[BeadCounter]

I just look at everything, not being conspiratorial. It’s also a bit of a “whodunnit” that I think gets people interested, not because someone is center, left or right, Liberal or Conservative.

[Mr. K]

I don't know what film you are looking at but the zapruder film clearly shows JFK's head moving back and to the left.

In addition, there is a photograph taken at the instant the bullet hits showing a spray out the back. (there is even a rainbow formed) The secret service agent who climbs onto the car is covered with it.

AND his brains are spattered all over the trunk. That is what Jackie is doing crawling onto the back- retrieving his brains. In her panic she just reacted with no reason, in the hospital she told them “I have his brains in my hands”

And you say you “dont know how much I paid for my degree- I hope it wasn't much” ???? seriously? Do you talk like an ASSHOLE to everyone? Or do you just have no ability to debate politely?

What is it with you people who religiously insist it was Oswald alone? What vested interest do you have?

[John S Mosby]

A government wide conspiracy kept secret by what would have to be hundreds of individuals, for 50 years. Oh yeah that would be the case, belying human nature, incredible OpSec, and having not one person of conscience ever spill the story.
Occam’s Razor, and improved investigative techniques obviate the US “gubmint” but certainly not state sponsored assassination. With regard to Benghazi— it is the internet that exposed the blatant lies of Clintoon/obamaumao/Rice, and the exposure and firing of CIA Director Petraeus that put the cap on the utter official lying of the “gubmint” in relentless following/seeking of the truth. And there, in truth is the fact that (w/McCain’s blessing) we were/are running guns to al Qaeda “friends” in Syria with Turkey’s help. Such is the nature of differential diagnosis, and in the case of JFK puts the lie after 50 years to most of the conspiracy theories predicated on leftist goals. In the middle of the Cold War, the ComIntern killed a Catholic US President (they tried to kill a Pope)— now that does make geopolitical sense, especially when one regards the Soviet Vietnam interests and the escalation by that micromanaging slime idiot LBJ and McNamara. Deo Vindice.