Posted on 04/13/2017 8:11:02 AM PDT by walford
"Most people enter their first relationships with the traditional idea of sexual exclusivity. It's just the way we're socialized in our culture."
For some couples, non-exclusivity might take the form of attending "play parties" together and swapping partners, watching other couples have sex, dating other people or even entering into polyamorous relationships with multiple partners. Determine what's OK and what's not.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
“Chimpanzee females have sex with more than one male. The males in a troop are usually related.
Some pair-bonded birds cheat, both sexes.”
Yes, individuals of any complex species can get away with promiscuity for a time, but each intimate contact with someone who is having sex with multiple partners is a game of chance.
Ever since I discovered girls when I was twelve or so ... I always fantasized about "the one special girl"
I never (and I'll challenge every man that reads this) desired to be a whoremonger par excellance !
Even Hugh Hefner had one special one ... admittedly for not very long.
But then, it's CNN always looking to screw up America by re-arranging her thought processes.
There is an entire field of scientific study now called sociobiology, which is essentially dedicated to coming up with sophisticated sounding excuses for crappy behavior.
“We have evidence that prehistoric man engaged in sex with many partners in order to spread diversity into the gene pool, yadda yadda.”
So.....you’re saying that we should abandon 5000 years of human civilization and go back to living like cavemen?
“YES, YES, that’s EXACTLY what we’re saying!!”
Good One !
“We have evidence that prehistoric man engaged in sex with many partners in order to spread diversity into the gene pool, yadda yadda.”
So.....you’re saying that we should abandon 5000 years of human civilization and go back to living like cavemen?
If I had my Moral Absolutes ping list, this would be pinged out.
Illustration of “How to Destroy Civilization in A Couple of Generations”.
Me too! Thanks be to God!
Based on the assumption that humans evolved yada yada.
Absolutely true!
“Holy Matrimony with one spouse for life is the surest way to give your children a legacy that will be remembered.”
This article could have been writen any year after 1965.
A subplot in “1984” was the “Anti-Sex League”. The Left is bringing that to fruition too, demeaning normal procreative copulation.
A subplot in “1984” was the “Anti-Sex League”. The Left is bringing that to fruition too, demeaning normal procreative copulation.
And they have made it so a baby is to be regarded as an unwanted consequence of using another person’s reproductive organs for pure pleasure — a STD, in fact.
Hence, we are selecting ourselves for extinction as we are replaced by those with an infantile mentality that does not allow for abortion, contraception or promiscuity. Hence, we are choosing to subsume our advanced civilization in favor of a primitive one that has one advantage: fecundity.
Lol, and they would hire teachers to speak lies to them and itch their ears.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry. 2 Timothy 4:3-5
It’s funny to read all of the objections to people having “multiple partners” but what most of them object to is the idea of multiple partners >at the same time<.
Serial monogamists like our President (who I support) are acceptable to these people even though his multiple marriages would offend them only if the marriages were concurrent. But because they’re consecutive it’s somehow acceptable.
And of course it’s still socially acceptable for single men to have as many sexual partners as they possibly can and that remains acceptable. Some of them are even celebrated for having multiple casual partners at the same time.
But if they commit to these multiple partners and commit to taking responsibility for the children they create then that makes them evil?
Seems to me that committed polygamy is far less of a threat to society than is the selective morality that eats away at the foundations of our civilization.
The left wants to destroy morality and have us all acting like bonobo monkeys.
Doesn’t CNN have better Trumps to go after than trying to support the existence and efforts toward illicit sex? I guess thbey are going to blame VD and aids on him and Bush.
red
A subplot in “1984” was the “Anti-Sex League”. The Left is bringing that to fruition too, demeaning normal procreative copulation.
I am no puritan, prude nor holier than thou. I know by nature humans and American culture is not perfect but the shift of immoral, indecent and rather hedonistic nature of American society in a very short amount of time is shocking and disturbing. This is a weapon of the left in their culture war. If there is Hell fire, Clinton and Obama will see it one day. I hold them responsible for opening up the depravity of our society as leaders of the scum left Rat Party. Furthermore, our side doing nothing and dismissing social values makes our side complicit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.