Posted on 03/03/2003 7:39:40 AM PST by presidio9
I have received several e-mails about Dennis Miller spewing hatred on The Tonight Show a few days ago. From what Im told, he expressed great contempt for the French and total disdain for the well-being of innocents in Iraq. I believe the letters because I have seen him express similar Jurassic views on other programs. We thought he had bottomed out when he became the sportscasting equivalent of William Shatner/lounge singer, but it now appears he wont be happy until he gets a show on the Fox News Channel.
I used to write for Miller in 1992, when he had a syndicated talk show. During the programs one season, Miller went from endorsing Jerry Brown to becoming a big Ross Perot supporter. A political impulse-buyer, his ideological cannon was never lashed very securely to the deck. Over the years, the cannon somehow became lodged on the starboard side of the vessel. Each time Miller receives a paycheck, he seems to take it to a bank further to the right of the last one. And now, more than a decade since I wrote my last joke for the man, I can only watch in stupefaction as this once hip and inside comic completes his transformation into a lout whose act sounds as if it were ghostwritten by George Jessel. Actually, thats not fair ... to George Jessel.
Dennis Miller was always decent to me. He gave me a chance, and I appreciated it, but he has become so obstinately wrong of late that I am left with no choice but to comment.
His attempt to style himself as a "Hollywood rebel" by completely sucking up to the ultimate "suits," which is to say the ones in Washington, is self-aggrandizing and pitiful. But then, tough as he speaks, Miller never met a powerful and/or connected guest he didnt suck up to. So its predictable that he would court the braying repressionists who have seized control of the White House. Now we must listen to Miller blather insufferably as he refers with devotion to George W. Bush with the ever-possessive term "my president." After all, W. must be good if he belongs to that self-styled Hollywood rebel Dennis Miller! Right? Miller is so egotistical that he thinks that by referring to Bush again and again as "my president," he somehow legitimizes W.s odious path to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. He believes his verbal consecration will make us forget that the little bastard stole the White House. To do otherwise would be to risk having Dennis Miller label us "un-hip." Heaven forfend!
No longer the youthful and sassy anchor of SNLs "Weekend Update" of all those years ago, Miller has become a national father figure. And what a lousy dad he is. Listening to his act is no longer something we look forward to; it is more like getting stuck in the back seat of your pops station wagon while he lectures you on "Americanism" through 30 miles of heavy traffic. In front of your friends.
But give Miller credit; he has accomplished something that almost no one before him has ever been able to do. He has actually become so vile that he is not even suitable company in Hollywood. He can now make a game-show host shudder in revulsion. This works well for the self-involved Miller. Why waste time considering the true horror and long-term ramifications of the violence he so blindly supports when we could instead be focusing on the assault of cold shoulders he has sustained on Rodeo Drive? Yeah, Dennis, enough of this massacre-of-innocents stuff, lets talk about you.
As cocksure as Miller is in his new political alliance, hed better watch himself he could be headed toward a 21st-century version of Hitlers "Night of the Long Knives." So long as church-state integrationist John Ashcroft is the attorney general, a purge of the potty-mouthed Miller is never a distant possibility.
He has carved a place for himself on the Rushmore of wrong-headedness, and there he will stay for years to come, a glowering, reactionary oaf for the ages. Hes ready for his close-up, Mr. Murdoch.
Visit Barry Crimmins's website at www.barrycrimmins.com.
I wonder if they think this approach wins friends and influences people?
It's hard to watch and wonderful to watch at the very same time.
Nope. No elitism here. (Peggy Noonan on Liberal Elitism)
The most interesting thing I discovered was that he testified against AOL before Congress in 1995, accusing them of not doing enough to stop child pornography.
He became interested in child pornography when he suddenly remembered being raped AS A BABY after discussions with his sister. He then started investigating all the chat rooms, often posing as a 12-year old girl. In one article he is quoted as saying someone offered to send him pornography that took EIGHT HOURS TO DOWNLOAD.
In my opinion, this guy is a nut case and is using his crusader position to amass way too much evidence of pornography.
He is a very bad person.
And this is supposed to be a bad thing?
If his first show tanked could you have had anything to do with it?
In my opinion, this guy is a nut case and is using his crusader position to amass way too much evidence of pornography.
He is a very bad person.
Give the preverts credit. They are very dilligent about their "research," aren't they? It is interesting that Mr. Crimmins crusades so tirelessly against child pornography, and then goes to work for a pro-child porn rag like the Phoenix. Nope, no conflict there
He is a bad person.
Don't get offended. The guy is an untalented loser who has not sniffed a mainstream buck in 20 years because he is boring and the things he rants about are no longer a cause for concern. He wrote the article to stick up for Phil Donahue, who is a good friend. The only half-way serious exposure Crimmins has had in a decade, was on Donahue, which had lower ratings than an Antiques Roadshow rereun. But, really, who is even going to see it in the Boston Phoenix? I'm guessing more people will read it on FR than would have read it on the Phoenix website. Enjoy his increasing irrelevance. If he can't piss off people on this website, he's not going to be able to do it anywhere. But, pretty soon, even we will begin to stop caring about his stupidity.
Leno was visibly unconfortable with Miller remarks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.