Skip to comments.
Libby jury hinting at deadlock
New York Daily News ^
| 3-3-07
| James Gordon Meek
Posted on 03/03/2007 1:56:15 PM PST by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Pins and needles.
1
posted on
03/03/2007 1:56:17 PM PST
by
STARWISE
To: the Real fifi; Laverne; onyx; Howlin; SE Mom; Grampa Dave; samadams2000; popdonnelly; ...
2
posted on
03/03/2007 1:57:20 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: STARWISE
In my mind, if you need "clarification of the term 'reasonable doubt'", thats reasonable doubt.
3
posted on
03/03/2007 1:59:34 PM PST
by
John W
To: STARWISE
David Corn seems to be thrilled at the thought of a conviction, even more than the others in the media. What is his involvement in this case, I can't seem to recall.
4
posted on
03/03/2007 1:59:56 PM PST
by
BonnieJ
To: STARWISE
I have learned not to depend on speculation, once I am convinced of one thing the opposite happens.
5
posted on
03/03/2007 2:00:04 PM PST
by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: STARWISE
Wisenberg said the government is not required to prove guilt with 100% certainty. No, they have to prove guilt wihtout a reasonable doubt.
It could be reasonable if there is a 5% chance he is telling the truth.
6
posted on
03/03/2007 2:00:22 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: STARWISE
I'd love to be on that jury. It could be ten or eleven other people vs. just me and I'd sit there and laugh at them.
7
posted on
03/03/2007 2:00:34 PM PST
by
rickdylan
To: STARWISE
8
posted on
03/03/2007 2:00:39 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: STARWISE
"Wisenberg said the government is not required to prove guilt with 100% certainty."
Is this true or is this Clintoonesque, parsed lawyerspeak?
9
posted on
03/03/2007 2:00:50 PM PST
by
Roccus
(They're living in the Dark Ages and they act like they own the world. [Dmitri Gredenko])
To: STARWISE
Just curious, but is it proper for the judge to tell the msm what the jury asks him during deliberations?
10
posted on
03/03/2007 2:03:55 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: BonnieJ
David Corn is buddies with Joe Wilson, Corn wrote the original article in which Wilson hinted that his wife worked for the CIA.
And yes "reasonable Doubt" means just that, whatmay happen is a comprimise verdict, YMMV.
11
posted on
03/03/2007 2:04:08 PM PST
by
p[adre29
(Arma in armatos)
To: Roccus
100% certainty != reasonable doubt
12
posted on
03/03/2007 2:04:33 PM PST
by
Doe Eyes
To: BonnieJ
One of the first to write about it .. check The Nation.
13
posted on
03/03/2007 2:05:49 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: Roccus
Not really. Theres a difference between shadow of a doubt and reasonable doubt.
That being said proving beyond a reasonable doubt is no low hurdle.
To: STARWISE
The jury also asked Walton if all of Libby's grand jury testimony has to be examined to find him guilty of obstructing justice.Could somebody 'splain what this is likely to mean?
The only interpretation I can make of it is that there's at least one holdout who insists on going through eight hours of testimony (again) if he's going to even entertain voting for a guilty verdict.
15
posted on
03/03/2007 2:06:20 PM PST
by
shhrubbery!
(Max Boot: Joe Wilson has sold more whoppers than Burger King)
To: John W
16
posted on
03/03/2007 2:06:51 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
To: STARWISE
Don't worry everyone! No matter whether Libby is found guilty or not, one thing is clear. It will be THE END OF BUSHITLERAMERIKKKA!!!!1111 either way. DU told me.
To: STARWISE
Plus, Corn co-wrote that book about his case, Hubris.
BTW...Unless we didn't get the whole question...how does the author of this figure there are 2 holdouts???
18
posted on
03/03/2007 2:08:41 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
To: John W
19
posted on
03/03/2007 2:09:53 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: Txsleuth
Right ... self-interest and protection runs DEEP.
20
posted on
03/03/2007 2:11:04 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson