Obama's Birth Certificate (new info?)

Western Center for Journalism via WND email | 25 March 2009 | Floyd Brown

[Mr. K]

"He would simply be removed by US Marshals. "

wow woud that be fun to watch...

[ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY]

You’re exactly right, on ALL counts!

It’s just plain unbelievable that the American people haven’t surrounded the Supreme Court building demanding that this be resolved!

[Frantzie]

Orly Taitz said a private investigator used Lexus Nexus database (used by all law firms and big corps) and they found hundreds of Barrack Obama’s with SS #’s around the USA. The mother apparently had access at the bank to SS info or something. One BO is or was 118 years old.

Why? The only thing I can think of is SS scams or voting scams???

Imagine if you collected SS from dozens of dead people? $400 a month x 80 = $32,000 a month? Were these people the biggest grifters in the world? Sounds like some Nigerian/Kenyan scam.

[ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY]

It is both. But it’s silly to quibble! LOL!

[brewcrew]

And if he were to be removed because he was never legally the president, all the legislation he signed would be invalid — including the stimulus and abhorrent executive orders.

A guy can dream, can't he? :)

[Raster Man]

He traveled on an Indonesian passport. Soetoro legally adopted him (hence 0bama’s name is legally Soetoro) and moved to Indinesia. 0bama atended a grade school for Indonesian citizens only. He visited Pakistan for a summer during college and had to have used an Indonesian passport. He enrolled at Occidental College under the foreign student scholarship program (why do you think he won’t release his transcripts).

[brewcrew]

wow woud that be fun to watch...

Yes, indeed.

Think we'd get some advance warning? Maybe have "Get Out Of Our House" parties all across the land, similar to the Super Bowl.

I hope they would cover it in HiDef. :)

[mo]

“Imagine if you collected SS from dozens of dead people? $400 a month x 80 = $32,000 a month...”

Ya know..I’ve often suspected that were we the people to get hold of the SS computers....we’d find

1) lots of folks with (D)after their names haven’t paid into it for decades

2) Probably millions of scamsters doing just what you’ve observed.

[FreeAtlanta]

Ideally, he will take the whole Democrat party down with him without taking down the country and the world. It is going to be a scary 4 years.

[TheCipher]

So, perhaps the fact that the FBI is not investigating and issuing criminal indictments is a reflection of the fact that Orly does not have what she says she has.

She has released it and in fact has submitted it to the Attorney General last week. Here is the report. To find the section on the SS numbers, do a word search on Sankey.

Now some of these could just be someone with the same name. However, below are three taken out of the list. They are definitely him.There are more that match his known addresses in Chicago and DC. The 042 prefix of the SS number indicates it was issued out of Conn.

Name - OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN

Gender - Male

Street Address - 300 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW

City, State, Zip - WASHINGTON DC 20001-2629

Probable Current Address - No

Telephone -

Telephone Accountholder -

Social Security - 042-68-xxxx

Age -

Date of Birth -

Deceased - No

Date Record Verified - Sep 05

------------------------------------

Name - OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN

Gender - Male

Street Address - PO BOX 49798

City, State, Zip - CHICAGO IL 60649

Probable Current Address - No

Telephone - 773-684-4809 - CST

Telephone Accountholder -

Social Security - 042-68-xxxx

Age - 47

Date of Birth - Aug 04, 1961

Deceased - No

Date Record Verified - Sep 99

-----------------------------------

Name - OBAMA, BARACK H

Gender - Male

Street Address - 5324 S KIMBARK AVE

City, State, Zip - CHICAGO IL 60615-5287

Probable Current Address - No

Telephone -

Telephone Accountholder -

Social Security - 042-68-xxxx

Age - 47

Date of Birth - Aug 04, 1961

Deceased - No

Date Record Verified - Jun 88 - Dec 90

Report

[masadaman]

It is also possible that the long form birth certificate is a non-issue and, courtesy of Leo Donofrio(www.naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com), a diversion big-time.

The real issue is that BHO Sr. was a British subject/citizen at the time of junior’s birth and such parenthood apart from place of birth prevents one from being a natural born citizen. Otherwise, the Constituion would not have the natural born requirement solely for President and Vice President, effectively planting double loyalty conditions, one of birth and one of parentage.

[nathanbedford]

Why do you think the court has not yet touched this matter and why do you think the court will not touch the matter but declare it a political question?

Because the Supreme Court knows it does not have the physical power to order the president to do anything. How many divisions does SCOTUS have?

The Supreme Court entered orders over the forced removal of the Cherokees along the trail of tears but President Jackson simply ignored their orders and did as he pleased. I'm old enough to remember that there was some doubt whether President Eisenhower would enforce the Supreme Court's orders respecting the integration of the schools in Arkansas.

The Supreme Court is painfully aware that ultimately its power is only as strong as the disposition of the people, the elected officials, and the Armed Forces to follow the court.

If the Supreme Court were to send federal marshals to the White House they would never get past the Secret Service or the Marine standing guard outside the Oval Office. The Supreme Court will not open itself to issuing unenforceable orders. It is not going to go verging into grave questions of state which they cannot control and might even lead to civil war

Moreover, there is ample legal precedent for the Supreme Court to take this position and quite properly so. After all, the matter could have been handled by the political parties themselves, by the secretaries of state of the individual states which certified candidates or ballots, or when they certified the election results, or by the political party in convention, or by the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Supreme Court is not the only venue for resolving disputes in America and it is not the venue for deciding "political" questions at all.

Make no mistake, I am as troubled by you are by Obama's inexplicable refusal to produce his birth certificate. Common sense tells me that there is only one explanation for this. However, I do not see much hope of any successful legal maneuver this administration and none whatsoever unless Republicans can take the Congress in 2010 in that body.

Our best hope is to set up a control process which bars the mountebank from reelection.Meanwhile, we should continue every legal challenge possible-I could be wrong-and beat the drum ceaselessly.

[EternalVigilance]

Who knew that the Court was such a paper tiger?

Maybe someone should have told all the Republican chief executives who over the last decade have been kowtowing to each and every unconstitutional opinion of the courts.

[TheCipher]

Interesting. But if the SC did decide he was ineligible, don't you think that would make him powerless as far as legislation goes ? If he signed a law, someone could bring a suit saying the law was unconstitutional because he signed it and SCOTUS would have to agree.

[brewcrew]

I’m just sayin’ that’s how it SHOULD work - all in theory, of course.

[TheCipher]

Also, this goes with my post above, you did ask :

How many divisions does SCOTUS have?

All of them. Because part of legislation that O would have to sign would be the budget. If no budget gets passed, no funding for the military, which means the troops don't get paid. And when the troops don't get paid ......

[nathanbedford]

Not necessarily.

Consider the complications of undoing legislation which has been on the books and executive orders which will have existed for years. We have never convicted a president in impeachment but I do not think that such a conviction would result in the undoing of his actions while in office. The court might find that since he was Procedurally duly elected and sworn in, his actions in office will stand. On the other hand the court could hold as you suggest that his actions are void, ab initio . But this would imply many things besides just the repeal of statutes and executive orders. What about contracts? Do recipients of the medal of freedom have to give them back? What about all the reliance that individuals, governments and businesses have placed on the statutes, executive orders, and executive agreements entered into? A very, very thorny situation.

And one more reason why it is unlikely that the court will simply issue an order ejecting a president.

[murron]

Couldn’t someone do some investigating and find out where these 3 people are currently to see if they really are 3 separate individuals? If they cannot be located, then that would be quite a story.

[epow]

Can he be impeached over ineligibility ?

Do you really think that a 60/40 Democrat House of Representatives would impeach a Democrat president? Even if it did, would a Senate with a similar Democrat majority convict him? Not even in our wildest dreams.

Kenya's favorite son could slash Little Red Riding Hood's throat with a razor on the floor of the House while it's in session and they wouldn't charge him with anything.

[nathanbedford]

I understand. All of this is completely uncharted.