... not a conglomeration of people fractured inventing their own beliefs.

Today's Rome allows it's members to believe whatever they want about apparitions.

Yet since when was the weight of Scriptural substantiation the basis for the veracity of Catholic doctrine?

Only when they want to justify something.

I had not been reading this thread for a while, but was pinged yesterday, and now i see that once more the same refuted argument that attempts to compel 1 Cor. 3 into service for RC Purgatory is one again being employed.

As a side note, I believe the Bible is clear that the Bema Seat occurs in Heaven thus it has nothing to do with purgatory and one cannot buy an indulgence to avoid The Bema Seat moment.

And with the only suffering after this life being that of the loss of rewards (and the Lord's revelation and disapproval) at the judgment seat of Christ, which one is saved despite the loss of, and which does not occur until the Lord's return and believers resurrection. (1Cor. 3:8ff; 4:5; 2Tim. 4:1,8; Rev.11:18; Mt. 25:31-46; 1Pt. 1:7; 5:4) And which resurrection being the only transformative the believer looks forward to after this life (Rm. 8:23; 2Co. 5:1-4; Phil 3:20,21; 1Jn. 3:2) — not purgatory, which suffering commences at death in order to enable souls to enter Heaven.

2Co 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.

And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth. (Revelation 11:18)

And there is a 1,000 year difference btwn the JSOC and the GWTJ, the resurrection of life and the resurrection of damnation:

Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. (John 5:28-29)

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. (Revelation 20:4-6)

Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist, which is celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains [i.e., a presbyter]. Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there, just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.

Which, among other RC distinctives , is not what is manifest in the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed, in which presbyter is the same as the bishop, (Titus 1:5-7: Acts 20:17,28; Phil. 1:1) with presbuteros (senior/elder) referring to position or age) and episkopos (superintendent/overseer) referring function.

And nowhere in the New Testament are there any Catholic priests, that is a separate sacerdotal class of believers whose primary unique function is to conduct the Lord’s supper and change bread and wine into the “true body and blood of Christ” (under the appearance of the then non-existent bread and wine) and offer it as a sacrifice for sin.

Neither presbuteros or episkopos are described as having any unique sacrificial function. Rather than dispensing bread as part of their ordained function, and offering the Lord's supper as a sacrifice for sin, neither of which NT pastors are ever described as doing in the life of the church (Acts onward, which writings show us how the NT church understood the gospels);

Instead, the primary work of NT pastors (besides prayer) is preaching. (Act 6:3,4; 2 Tim.4:2) by which they “feed the flock” (Acts 20:28; 1Pt. 5:2) ) for the word is called spiritual "milk," (1Co. 3:22; 1Pt. 1:22) and "meat," (Heb. 5:12-14) what is said to "nourish" the souls of believers, and believing it is how the lost obtain life in themselves. (1 Timothy 4:6; ;Acts 15:7-9; cf. Psalms 19:7) In contrast op the Catholic corruption of the Lord's supper, nowhere in the record of what the NT church believed is the Lord's supper described as spiritual food, and the means of obtaining spiritual life in oneself.

All believers are called to sacrifice (Rm. 12:1; 15:16; Phil. 2:17; 4:18; Heb. 13:15,16; cf. 9:9) and all constitute the only priesthood (hieráteuma) in the NT church, that of all believers, (1Pt. 2:5,9; Re 1:6; 5:10; 20:6). But nowhere are NT pastors distinctively titled hiereus, and the idea of the NT presbuteros being a distinctive class titled "hiereus" was a later development, which Catholicism attempts to justify via an imposed functional equivalence, supposing NT presbuteros engaged in a unique sacrificial ministry as their primary function.

Catholic writer Greg Dues in "Catholic Customs & Traditions, a popular guide," states, "Priesthood as we know it in the Catholic church was unheard of during the first generation of Christianity, because at that time priesthood was still associated with animal sacrifices in both the Jewish and pagan religions."

"When the Eucharist came to be regarded as a sacrifice [after Rome's theology], the role of the bishop took on a priestly dimension. By the third century bishops were considered priests. Presbyters or elders sometimes substituted for the bishop at the Eucharist. By the end of the third century people all over were using the title 'priest' (hierus in Greek and sacerdos in Latin) for whoever presided at the Eucharist." (Catholic Customs & Traditions)

And rather than requiring pastors to be celibate, the norm for both apostles and pastors was to be married, with being a father providing positive credentials for being a pastor, and with celibacy being a gift that not all have. (1 Corinthians 7:7; 9:5; 1 Timothy 3:1-5; Titus 1:5-9)

... not a conglomeration of people fractured inventing their own beliefs.

“Today’s Rome allows it’s members to believe whatever they want about apparitions.”

Incorrect. What you people misunderstand, it is no wonder you despise the Catholic Church lol.

Only the public Revelation of God’s Word has to be believed by Catholics. Private revelation or apparitions go through a long process of validation before they are approved by Christ’s Church. It can only be approved if it doesn’t contradict Public Divine Revelation.

...More importantly, even approved private revelation does not have to be believed by Church members.

To: rbmillerjr

“Today’s Rome allows it’s members to believe whatever they want about apparitions.”

Incorrect. What you people misunderstand, it is no wonder you despise the Catholic Church lol.

Oh??

Let's just see if YOU know what YOU are talking about!

According to the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, the era of public revelation ended with the death of the last living Apostle. A Marian apparition, if deemed genuine by Church authority, is treated as private revelation that may emphasize some facet of the received public revelation for a specific purpose, but it can never add anything new to the deposit of faith. The Church may pronounce an apparition as worthy of belief, but belief is never required by divine faith.^[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_apparition

...it is no wonder you despise the Catholic Church...

"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours."

--Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)

... but it can never add anything new to the deposit of faith.

Dang!

There go them 15 promises!!!

‘We have recourse to your protection, holy Mother of God!' Despise not our petitions in our necessities”.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000626_message-fatima_en.html

Public Revelation and private revelations – their theological status

Before attempting an interpretation, the main lines of which can be found in the statement read by Cardinal Sodano on 13 May of this year at the end of the Mass celebrated by the Holy Father in Fatima, there is a need for some basic clarification of the way in which, according to Church teaching, phenomena such as Fatima are to be understood within the life of faith. The teaching of the Church distinguishes between “public Revelation” and “private revelations”. The two realities differ not only in degree but also in essence. The term “public Revelation” refers to the revealing action of God directed to humanity as a whole and which finds its literary expression in the two parts of the Bible: the Old and New Testaments. It is called “Revelation” because in it God gradually made himself known to men, to the point of becoming man himself, in order to draw to himself the whole world and unite it with himself through his Incarnate Son, Jesus Christ. It is not a matter therefore of intellectual communication, but of a life-giving process in which God comes to meet man. At the same time this process naturally produces data pertaining to the mind and to the understanding of the mystery of God. It is a process which involves man in his entirety and therefore reason as well, but not reason alone. Because God is one, history, which he shares with humanity, is also one. It is valid for all time, and it has reached its fulfilment in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. In Christ, God has said everything, that is, he has revealed himself completely, and therefore Revelation came to an end with the fulfilment of the mystery of Christ as enunciated in the New Testament. To explain the finality and completeness of Revelation, the Catechism of the Catholic Church quotes a text of Saint John of the Cross: “In giving us his Son, his only Word (for he possesses no other), he spoke everything to us at once in this sole Word—and he has no more to say... because what he spoke before to the prophets in parts, he has now spoken all at once by giving us the All Who is His Son. Any person questioning God or desiring some vision or revelation would be guilty not only of foolish behaviour but also of offending him, by not fixing his eyes entirely upon Christ and by living with the desire for some other novelty” (No. 65; Saint John of the Cross,The Ascent of Mount Carmel, II, 22).

Every Rosary increases Mary's power

http://www.rosary-center.org/fatima.htm

"Jesus wishes to establish devotion to my Immaculate Heart in the world. I promise salvation to those who embrace it."

(June 13, 1917) REALLY???

I do admire your tenacity. Sadly, the walls of confined Catholic mindset are too high and too thick for truth to penetrate.

x

Sadly, the walls of confined Catholic mindset are too high and too thick for truth to penetrate.

Not so!

Even thickheaded Paul was 'gotten to' by the Holy Spirit!

You know that he just KNEW what he was doing was correct.

placemarker