Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Series of bumps sent Uranus into its sideways spin
http://www.astronomy.com ^ | 07 OCT 2011 | Staff

Posted on 10/10/2011 12:38:05 PM PDT by Red Badger

If Uranus was not tilted in one blow, as is commonly thought, but rather was bumped in at least two smaller collisions, there is a much higher probability of seeing its moons orbit in the direction we observe. By European Planetary Science Congress, AAS Division for Planetary Science —

Uranus’ highly tilted axis makes it something of an oddball in our solar system. The accepted wisdom is that Uranus was knocked on its side by a single large impact, but new research rewrites our theories of how Uranus became so tilted and also solves fresh mysteries about the position and orbits of its moons. By using simulations of planetary formation and collisions, it appears that early in its life Uranus experienced a succession of small punches instead of a single knock-out blow. This research has important ramifications on our theories of giant planet formation.

Uranus is unusual in that its spin axis is inclined by 98° compared to its orbital plane around the Sun. This is far more pronounced than other planets, such as Jupiter (3°), Earth (23°), or Saturn and Neptune (29°). Uranus is, in effect, spinning on its side.

The generally accepted theory is that in the past a body a few times more massive than Earth collided with Uranus, knocking the planet on its side. There is, however, one significant flaw in this notion: The moons of Uranus should have been left orbiting in their original angles, but they, too, lie at almost exactly 98°.

This long-standing mystery has been solved by an international team of scientists led by Alessandro Morbidelli from the Cote d’Azur Observatory in Nice, France.

Morbidelli and his team used simulations to reproduce various impact scenarios in order to ascertain the most likely cause of Uranus’ tilt. They discovered that if Uranus had been hit when still surrounded by a protoplanetary disk — the material from which the moons would form — then the disk would have reformed into a fat doughnut shape around the new, highly tilted equatorial plane. Collisions within the disk would have flattened the doughnut, which would then go onto form the moons in the positions we see today.

However, the simulation threw up an unexpected result: In the above scenario, the moons displayed retrograde motion — that is to say, they orbited in the opposite direction to that which we observe. Morbidelli’s group tweaked their parameters in order to explain this. The surprising discovery was that if Uranus was not tilted in one go, as is commonly thought, but rather was bumped in at least two smaller collisions, then there is a much higher probability of seeing the moons orbit in the direction we observe.

This research is at odds with current theories of how planets form, which may now need adjusting. “The standard planet formation theory assumes that Uranus, Neptune, and the cores of Jupiter and Saturn formed by accreting only small objects in the protoplanetary disk,” said Morbidelli. “They should have suffered no giant collisions. The fact that Uranus was hit at least twice suggests that significant impacts were typical in the formation of giant planets. So, the standard theory has to be revised.”


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; deusexmachina; impact; moonsofuranus; neptune; planet; ringarounduranus; science; solarsystem; space; uranus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Red Badger
Series of bumps sent Uranus into its sideways spin

21 posted on 10/10/2011 2:23:09 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Series of bumps sent Uranus into its sideways spin

And what is big enough to "bump" a gas-giant sideways?

Hmmm... lemme think...


22 posted on 10/10/2011 2:38:33 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
What are things you never want to hear from a proctologist for $1,000.00, Alex.

ROFL - Best Indulge-The-Temptation-And-Make-The-Joke-Anyway Post Award!

23 posted on 10/10/2011 2:40:53 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Totally gay.


24 posted on 10/10/2011 10:08:08 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
Note: this topic is from 10/10/2011.
Thanks Red Badger.

 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

25 posted on 11/05/2011 8:36:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I honestly did not know that Uranus was blue!


26 posted on 11/05/2011 8:45:32 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; married21; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; ...

Thanks Red Badger.
Note: this topic is from 10/10/2011.
An "extra, extra" ping.


27 posted on 11/05/2011 9:29:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In spite of all the stupid jokes, a most interesting topic. Thanks for posting it.

Since our inclination causes our seasons, makes you wonder what they would be like on Uranus (and please, no more dumb comments).


28 posted on 11/06/2011 2:01:23 PM PST by ixtl ( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ixtl

Since Uranus is so far from the sun, the difference in the seasons would be negligible. Summer would still be close to solid methane temp...........


29 posted on 11/07/2011 6:20:27 AM PST by Red Badger (Obama's number one economics advisor must be a Magic Eight Ball.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Actually, I was thinking what the effect would be on Earth’s seasons if our axis was inclined that far. Guess I wasn’t clear


30 posted on 11/08/2011 9:52:16 AM PST by ixtl ( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

suprised not to see Uranus on this thread....


31 posted on 11/08/2011 9:53:43 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Sideways? Is that like bumbling down the banister?


32 posted on 11/08/2011 9:58:27 AM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ixtl

If Earth was tilted mach further than it is now, the ‘seasons’ would be extreme, to say the least. There would probably be only two: Fire and Ice. .....


33 posted on 11/08/2011 11:07:08 AM PST by Red Badger (Obama's number one economics advisor must be a Magic Eight Ball.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson