Skip to comments.
.50-caliber gun ban ill-advised
times union ^
| 4 23 04
| fred lebrun
Posted on 04/23/2004 12:28:56 PM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Most sportsmen I know don't see the need to get worked up over New York State Assembly legislation that would ban the sale and ownership of a .50-caliber gun.
and that is the biggest problem right there this is how a country with a gaurenteed right to own firearms ends up having 20 000 laws outlawing fireamrs and no ione gets pissed enough to try to get them off the books until it is waaaaaaay to late voter apathy is more dangerous then a liberal majority any day
To: freepatriot32
The ONLY reason they want to pass this law is to further demonize and isolate another less popular firearm. Sooner or later they want them ALL, including black powder 200 year old muzzle loaders.
2
posted on
04/23/2004 12:34:10 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: freepatriot32
3
posted on
04/23/2004 12:37:19 PM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: *bang_list
4
posted on
04/23/2004 12:38:58 PM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"Fifty-caliber guns have no legitimate purpose, and to keep them legal is supporting keeping them legal for terrorists and others," Silver told the Associated Press.
5
posted on
04/23/2004 12:45:43 PM PDT
by
12GA
To: *bang_list; **New_York; Fledermaus; Travis McGee; *libertarians; *gov_watch; *Constitution List; ...
ping
6
posted on
04/23/2004 12:46:17 PM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(today it was the victory act tomorrow its victory coffee, victory cigarettes...)
To: freepatriot32; All
Thanks for posting this article. You saved me the trouble. Where did the author get the idea it's modern, weighs 50 lbs and is single shot?
7
posted on
04/23/2004 12:47:08 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: freepatriot32
This is incrementalism plain and simple. Just imagine if this piece of crap legislation were to pass, then substitute whatever firearm you own in the following sentence:
"[your_gun_here] guns have no legitimate purpose, and to keep them legal is supporting keeping them legal for terrorists and others," Silver told the Associated Press.
To: freepatriot32
The 50 caliber.
It's not just for snipers anymore.
Is that a S&W .50 in your pocket? Or are you just happy to see me?
9
posted on
04/23/2004 12:50:30 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,Election '04...It's going to be a bumpy ride,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø)
To: OXENinFLA
Enfield No. 4 Mk. 1?
10
posted on
04/23/2004 12:51:13 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
To: OXENinFLA
Barrett 0.50 purchased in U.S.A. endangers US servicemen in Kosovo today. Go figure. 48 should not be terrorist Wall Mart.
11
posted on
04/23/2004 12:55:34 PM PDT
by
DTA
(you ain't seen nothing yet)
To: DuncanWaring
Enfield No. 4 Mk. 1?
The action is a thing of beauty.:)
To: 12GA
Only trained military and police experts need what are clearly weapons of war!
13
posted on
04/23/2004 12:59:28 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: freepatriot32
This stupid bill was created by liberal morons who know nothing about guns and it's caliber. 12.7x99 BMG (.50 BMG) is a deadly round that was designed to penetrate tank armor. Guns like the Barrett M82A1 are very heavy and I seriously doubt anyone would want to carry it around, especially since you can't hide it. When is the last time anyone was killed by a wannabe gang-banger with a massive Barrett?
14
posted on
04/23/2004 12:59:46 PM PDT
by
Chinese_American_Patriot
(9/11/01 - Never Forget, NEVER Forgive!!!! Al-Fallujah, Iraq. The home of savage Islamofacists!!!!)
To: neverdem; TexasCowboy; humblegunner; Flyer; Squantos
Barrett M99 (Big Shot)
Specifications:
- Caliber .50 BMG (12.7 X 99mm)
- Chamber Chambered for commercial and MATCH ammunition
- Operation Single shot bolt action
- Barrel Length 33 inches (83.8 cm)
- Overall Length 50.4 inches (128 cm)
- Barrel Weight 14 pounds (6.4 kg)
- Rifle Weight 25 pounds (11.36 kg)
- Finish Black or Green (Add $100.00 for Green)
This looks like a "legitimate" use!!!
15
posted on
04/23/2004 1:04:57 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(That the bright star of Texas shall never be dim while her soil boasts a son to raise rifle or limb.)
To: All
I am so sick of hearing "hunting" and the "second amendment " mentioned in the same place. Like if they have something to do with each other - lame!
And suppose there is a ban on these rifles. Is it for future sales or is it for anyone that currently owns one? Do they have to turn in they're $2,000 -$10,000+ investment.
16
posted on
04/23/2004 1:05:13 PM PDT
by
ezo4
To: ezoeni
I agree. The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.
17
posted on
04/23/2004 1:13:39 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Have you hugged your tagline today?)
To: Eaker; TexasCowboy
This looks like a "legitimate" use!!! I have no idea why the anti-gunners would be down on the .50.
That particular model has no magazine, can't sustain any real rate of fire
(although anyone who can rapid-fire that beast unmounted has my respect)
and has never been used for anything criminal that I know of.
Hell, yer average thug couldn't tote the damned thing.
Legitimate use? Look at how dour and unhappy everyone looks in the picture. < /sarcasm>
To: ezoeni
"Is it for future sales or is it for anyone that currently"
Ask the citizens of Kalerfornia.
19
posted on
04/23/2004 1:25:53 PM PDT
by
Deguello
To: freepatriot32
[Assemblywoman Patricia Eddington] was 17 years a social worker in public schoolsThat alone should have disqualified her from being a political representative.
[Eddington's] motivation comes from awful discussions about kids bringing guns to school.
Yes, I'm sure there were many kids discussing how they were going to go out and spend $10,000 on a .50 cal rifle to shoot up the school.
As far as the "terrorist" angle goes, even if a terrorist wanted to use one of these rifles (which is unlikely), what makes anyone think that they won't be able to obtain one illegally? Hell, they could have hundreds of these rifles--along with more deadly weapons and munitions--walked across the Mexican border with their comrades. Laws only apply to the law-abiding.
20
posted on
04/23/2004 1:30:30 PM PDT
by
SpyGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson