Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Project plans map of Neanderthal genome
The Globe and Mail ^ | 7/24/06 | GEIR MOULSON

Posted on 07/24/2006 11:41:28 AM PDT by doc30

BERLIN — U.S. and German scientists have launched a two-year project to decipher the genetic code of the Neanderthal, a feat they hope will help deepen understanding of how modern humans' brains evolved.

Neanderthals were a species that lived in Europe and western Asia from more than 200,000 years ago to about 30,000 years ago. Scientists from Germany's Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology are teaming up a company in Connecticut to map the genome, or humans' DNA code.

“The Neanderthal is the closest relative to the modern human, and we believe that by sequencing the Neanderthal we can learn a lot,” said Michael Egholm, a vice-president at 454 Life Sciences Corp. of Branford, Conn., which will use its high-speed sequencing technology in the project.

There are no firm answers yet about how humans picked up key traits such as walking upright and developing complex language. Neanderthals are believed to have been relatively sophisticated, but lacking in humans' higher reasoning functions.

The Neanderthal project follows scientists' achievement last year in deciphering the DNA of the chimpanzee, our closest living relative. That genome map produced a long list of DNA differences between humans and chimps and some hints about which differences might be crucial.

The chimp genome “led to literally too many questions, there were 35 million differences between us and chimpanzees – that's too much to figure out,” 454 chairman Jonathan Rothberg said in a telephone interview.

“By having Neanderthal, we'll really be able to home in on the small percentage of differences that gave us higher cognitive abilities,” he said. “Neanderthal is going to open the box. It's not going to answer the question, but it's going to tell where to look to understand all of those higher cognitive functions.”

Over two years, the scientists aim to reconstruct a draft of the three-billion building blocks of the Neanderthal genome – working with fossil samples from several individuals.

They face the complication of working with 40,000-year-old samples, and of filtering out microbial DNA that contaminated them after death.

Only about 5 per cent of the DNA in the samples is actually Neanderthal DNA, Mr. Egholm said, but he and Mr. Rothberg said pilot experiments had convinced them that the decoding was feasible.

At the Max Planck Institute, the project also involves Svante Paabo, who nine years ago participated in a pioneering, though smaller-scale, DNA test on a Neanderthal sample.

That study suggested that Neanderthals and humans split from a common ancestor a half-million years ago and backed the theory that Neanderthals were an evolutionary dead end.

The new project will help in understanding how characteristics unique to humans evolved and “will also identify those genetic changes that enabled modern humans to leave Africa and rapidly spread around the world,” Mr. Paabo said in a statement Thursday.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution; genetics; genome; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
Any estimates as to what the genetic differences will be?
1 posted on 07/24/2006 11:41:30 AM PDT by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

ping


2 posted on 07/24/2006 11:41:47 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

No genetic differences at all. All Neanderthal DNA is alive and well in the NFL........


3 posted on 07/24/2006 11:45:03 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

>>Any estimates as to what the genetic differences will be?<<

They covered this in this week's Simpsons - there were no cave men - man was created as is.


4 posted on 07/24/2006 11:46:32 AM PDT by gondramB (The options on the table have been there from the beginning. Withdraw and fail or commit and succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And here I was thinking it was alive and well in the DNC....


5 posted on 07/24/2006 11:46:34 AM PDT by KenHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I don't see how they can isolate actual Neanderthal DNA?


6 posted on 07/24/2006 11:49:47 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KenHorse

After watching Russert over the weekend, they have living specimen in the GE family.


7 posted on 07/24/2006 11:50:49 AM PDT by Bubba M. Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30

The same as the difference between the dunk and the two-handed set shot.


8 posted on 07/24/2006 11:53:18 AM PDT by Spaghetti Man (NJ politics suck (and apparently so do some of the politicians!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KenHorse

Well, I bet a lot of NFL players are Demokratz.....


9 posted on 07/24/2006 11:54:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I guess, depending on what samples they have and what their condition is.. the only hope of getting the original uncontaminated DNA would be deep inside of large bones (maybe in the the marrow if there's any left?). Just speculation on my part.


10 posted on 07/24/2006 11:54:41 AM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ

I respectfully disagree. There are two big things in this article. The first point cincerns techniques to separate contaminating DNA from the sample DNA. The second will let us see more specific genetic differences than those between humans and chimps. The results of science are typically small, incremental steps, not huge, fantastic leaps like those shown in the movies.


12 posted on 07/24/2006 11:59:28 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doc30

They'll have a unusual preference for roast duck and mango salsa. :-D


13 posted on 07/24/2006 11:59:30 AM PDT by rock_lobsta (cair = hamas = iran = EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 380 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

14 posted on 07/24/2006 12:01:20 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doc30
an evolutionary dead end. . .. . .

Would that this could happen to Liberals. . .

15 posted on 07/24/2006 12:04:15 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Project plans map of Neanderthal genome

So we are going to study terrorist ... nifty.
16 posted on 07/24/2006 12:04:16 PM PDT by Element187
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

anti-science ===> Placemarker <===
17 posted on 07/24/2006 12:04:47 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta
They'll have a unusual preference for roast duck and mango salsa. :-D

They don't have much of an appetite when they're irate.

18 posted on 07/24/2006 12:08:46 PM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ

I agree with you. I'm curious who is paying for this.


20 posted on 07/24/2006 12:21:40 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson