Skip to comments.
Squid Fossils, Ancient DNA, and a Young Earth
ACTS & FACTS ^
| October 2009
| Frank Sherwin, M.A.
Posted on 10/27/2009 10:09:22 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
The field of biology has provided much support for a recent creation, and physical evidence of very young-looking biological materials from supposedly ancient fossils continues to accrue from around the world, and from various depths under the earth.
In August of this year, paleontologists in Trowbridge, Wiltshire, England, made a discovery that astounded the evolutionary community...
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: anthropology; antiscienceevos; atomsdonotexist; belongsinreligion; catastrophism; catholic; christian; christianmythology; corruption; creation; darwindrones; dna; electricityisfire; evangelical; evolution; evoreligionexposed; fossils; godsgravesglyphs; gravityisahoax; intelligentdesign; judaism; mythology; notasciencetopic; paleontology; propellerbeanie; protestant; science; superstition; templeofdarwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: ElectricStrawberry
What I find amazing is that someone would be surprised that a ground up and rehydrated fossilized ink sac would make an ink-like substance.
SHOCKER!!!
21
posted on
10/27/2009 12:28:00 PM PDT
by
ElectricStrawberry
(Didja know that Man walked with vegetarian T. rex within the last 4,351 years?)
To: GodGunsGuts
Are you casting pearls in front of swine? ;0)
22
posted on
10/27/2009 1:29:20 PM PDT
by
seemoAR
To: ElectricStrawberry; GodGunsGuts
This was discussed the first time this article appeared.
Apparently, the ink sac was not fossilized, it was just dessicated.
In fossilization, the bony material of the creature is replaced by minerals from the surrounding soil. Other elements, (like an ink sac) become dessicated. They can be rehydrated.
23
posted on
10/27/2009 5:21:46 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: UCANSEE2
Excellent description...and to the point! Thanks for helping to clear things up :o)
To: GodGunsGuts
To: GodGunsGuts
To: GodGunsGuts
I wonder why it took 50 to 70 years for science to accept Darwin’s natural selection theory, and reject his Pangenesis theory altogether.
27
posted on
10/27/2009 10:32:25 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: ElectricStrawberry
No surprise, it rehydrated into something that you could draw with. Of course, you can do the same with some tree barks, some seeds, some rocks, some clays, some insects..... I bet the Precambrian banded irons rocks that billions of years old would make a nice red ink.
28
posted on
10/27/2009 10:37:28 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson