Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put Obama on Ballot
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | 2-24-12 | Pamela Barnett

Posted on 02/24/2012 7:50:20 PM PST by ednoonan7

Obama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put Obama on Ballot, Ignore Law and Fraud Evidence, Audio, First Hand Account

Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 25 February, at 01 : 36 AM Print

Biased Indiana Elections officials call objectors “birthers”, don’t address and matters of law and ignore evidence that Obama is using a social security number that was never assigned to him. When Obama started using this stolen SSN he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah.

First hand account here, unedited….

I hate to be the bearer of bad news today, but I was along side Orly Taitz as she did a hell of a job bringing up the subject of Obama not having a valid social security number at The Indiana Election Division Hearings’ candidate challenges. I am not sure of the name of the older Democrat on the panel of Election Board, but he basically stated that “how does a non-valid social security number from Connecticut keep Obama from Being a US Citizen ( and therefore President of the US)?” My jaw about hit the floor!!! Nah, no fraud here!, keep moving along folks, keep moving on. Orly gave more evidence( she brought along with her) to the panel besides the over 200 pages of Georgia Court case where many experts in their respective fields testified under oath to the fact Obama is a fraud. The chairman said the extra info could not be used as evidence!!!

Another dem on the election panel said most of the GA Court pages we turned in were not validated & did not have anything to do with the case, and basically it was a setup from the get-go. As Orly presented her case as a witness for us (since she was at the Ga Court Hearings last month), the tempers started to flare on both sides. One gentleman in the audience stood up and told the Chairman that he was being rude to Ms. Taitz and then we all took a 10 minute recess to cool our heads. Well, after Orly explained the connection to Obama’s fraudulent social security number, birth certificate from Hawaii, and mother’s record’s-it did not matter. We lost the challenge 4-0, and get this… There were all of the local tv channel’s cameras around the perimeter taping the proceedings and there were media people on each side of the election panel…but during our brief 10 minutes-that is all the time the Chairman said we would get to present our case- all of the tv cameras disappeared and most of the media left!! Nah, there is no conspiracy here. No media to even interview us after the verdict in the halls outside of the Indiana House Chamber of the Indiana Statehouse. This Country is screwed, blue-ed, and tattoo-ed. This Country and The Constitution is over if Obama gets in one more time. Time is running out. Let’s pray that Sheriff Joe of Arizona has better news for us all. God Bless K. S.

Election Commission deliberations on audio here.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ballot; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; challenge; indiana; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; ssn; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2012 7:50:29 PM PST by ednoonan7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

Bump, bump and BUMP...

Will continue to keep praying about this.


2 posted on 02/24/2012 7:58:09 PM PST by Joined2Justify (I would like to be laughing about all this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

What bothers me more than anything else is that a precedent is being set. And no court seems willing to “go on the record” and clarify what a Natural Born Citizen is.

To make it worse, it looks as if Obama committed identity fraud and no one cares.


3 posted on 02/24/2012 8:06:44 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Obama has all the power. Who ya’ gonna call?


4 posted on 02/24/2012 8:10:12 PM PST by SatinDoll (No Foreign Naionals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

......comments edited for continued access - and they weren’t flowery..


5 posted on 02/24/2012 8:10:22 PM PST by mcshot (CHECKS AND BALANCES WHERE ART THOU? LORD HEAR OUR PRAYERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Mayhap to prevent riots in the streets? Not that that is a viable excuse, but there is that.


6 posted on 02/24/2012 8:11:29 PM PST by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
Biased Indiana Elections officials call objectors “birthers”, don’t address and matters of law and ignore evidence that Obama is using a social security number that was never assigned to him.

And, this is a surprise to whom!!???

7 posted on 02/24/2012 8:17:28 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
V

Google Minor v. Happersett. The issue was settled decades ago, but no one wants to enforce it . . . . . . . especially those on the LEFT side of the road!

8 posted on 02/24/2012 8:19:33 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

Watched Stossel tonight. I’m convinced we’re just a short step away from living in a Nazi state.


9 posted on 02/24/2012 8:21:20 PM PST by Terry Mross (Difference between a conservative / liberal-obvious. Difference between a rep and a dem? None)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

I agree with you, it’s just that the Nazis kept good records, and the Communists, world-wide, hid and destroyed records. I see direct born-again Bolsheviks in and near the administration, from Jack Lew to Ezekiel Emmanuel. They even wear the Bolshevik glasses. We might have won against the Nazis, but we lost the war to Communists, who have never gone away and are now surging proud and strong.


10 posted on 02/24/2012 8:33:01 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

When are folks going to give up on this avenue to “unseat” Obama? While there may very well be enough real evidence to prove that Obama is not eligible (he is definitely a fraud, regardless of the state of “Natural Born Citizen” status), no court with any real authority is going to do a darned thing about Obama. I honestly believe that even if there was what any reasonable judge could not deny were to come out - showing without a doubt that Obama is not eligible to be POTUS - nothing would be done. We have already seen the US Supreme court refuse to even take a serious look - Foot, there is “reasonable doubt” about his BC that there should be some mega official investigation.

But alas - as I posted back in 2009 soon after his “immaculate” installation (thank you Rush), no judge or politician has the intestinal fortitude to take any meaningful action. They know that, regardless of how horribly unpopular Obama might get to be - that there would be widespread rioting in the streets, property would be massively damaged, and who knows how many people would die.


11 posted on 02/24/2012 8:46:10 PM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

People in IN could again still fall for Obama; after all they are Hoosiers.


12 posted on 02/24/2012 9:23:38 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7; LucyT
"There were all of the local tv channel’s cameras around the perimeter taping the proceedings and there were media people on each side of the election panel…but during our brief 10 minutes-that is all the time the Chairman said we would get to present our case- all of the tv cameras disappeared and most of the media left!! Nah, there is no conspiracy here. No media to even interview us after the verdict in the halls outside of the Indiana House Chamber of the Indiana Statehouse."

Bonus: Sheriff Joe mention.

13 posted on 02/24/2012 9:23:58 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman; wintertime
They know that, regardless of how horribly unpopular Obama might get to be - that there would be widespread rioting in the streets, property would be massively damaged, and who knows how many people would die.

I absolutely do not buy that and never have. That's the elites' excuse for enabling and covering a coup. 0bummer and his gang can't even set up a proper Attack Watch or Occupukes or SEICU takedown of anything. They can only rule by recess appointment and executive order. And they can only do that for one reason:

Republicans in judges are gutless cowards and/or complicit. This "fear" of rioting is getting old, I am 100% sure it is made up by the freaking gutless coward Rs so they don't have to stand on principles. Makes me want to puke, it does.

14 posted on 02/24/2012 9:24:31 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Alas, your post says it all! The American people will be fooled with their own consent.


15 posted on 02/24/2012 9:25:14 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
1. On the presidential candidate's Indiana application form, does the candidate have to supply his Social Security number?

2. Social Security application form: As many of us know, any person can easily get a copy of his own Social Security application form after paying a small fee.

3. My point is this: President Obama could quickly put a stop to this Social Security number controversy by simply getting a copy of his 1970s Social Security application form and showing it to the public just like he got a copy of his Hawaii long form birth certificate and showed it to the public back in April 2011.

4. Of course, I don't believe that President Obama will ever release a copy of his Social Security application form---we can see a copy of President Eisenhower's Social Security application, because I believe that the public can get a copy of a person's application form after a person dies---out of the kindness of his heart. No way.

5. But maybe if enough reporters put continuous severe pressure on presidential candidate Obama to release his 1970s Social Security application during this 2012 campaign period, Obama might go ahead and release his 1970s Social Security application.

6. If candidate Obama stubbornly refuses to release his 1970s Social Security application form, I can only conclude that President Obama is trying to hide something, because a Social Security application form contains only very basic information about the applicant, like his name and his address.

7. To Indiana election officials: If President Obama used a false Social Security number on his Indiana presidential candidate application form, then he is committing fraud, and he should not be allowed to put his name on the presidential ballot for the Nov. 2012 election.

16 posted on 02/24/2012 9:42:37 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
You mean like clicking on this here linky? Minor v. Happersett
17 posted on 02/24/2012 9:43:54 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; philman_36; Gvl_M3; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; ...

0bama Biased Indiana Elections Officials Vote to Put 0bama on Ballot, Ignore Law and Fraud Evidence, Audio, First Hand Account

. . . . Check out article.

Thanks, Flotsam_Jetsome.

18 posted on 02/24/2012 10:41:02 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

So both Arizona and Indiana fell through the sieve today?


19 posted on 02/24/2012 10:50:13 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
"So both Arizona and Indiana fell through the sieve today?"

If you're referring to the challenge in Tucson that was dismissed (without prejudice), that case is apparently not dead, just yet and can be refiled, sans fee.

If you're referring to intestinal fortitude and/or honor in the judiciary as a body, well that's another conversation altogether. . .

20 posted on 02/24/2012 11:09:56 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

and who knows how many people would die.

How many died in the founding this country against the British. It’s only a matter of time?


21 posted on 02/25/2012 5:05:04 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

So the farce continues.


22 posted on 02/25/2012 5:55:37 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

See 22.


23 posted on 02/25/2012 5:56:48 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

for later


24 posted on 02/25/2012 7:22:32 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; philman_36; LucyT
Indiana was the worst possible venue for an eligibility challenge because it is home to the ONLY appeals court, the Ankeny Court, to have ruled on the NBC issue...and that was in favor of Obama.

So the two of four GOP lawyers who were commissioners were bound by the law of IN ruling that Obama was NBC, as pronounced by their appeals court.

Also, the burden of proof in IN was on the challengers even if the candidate didn't show up, unlike GA where a default was available in the event of a no-show by Obama (which the challengers declined in GA).

The commissioners were forced to resort to "Since when does a president need a social security number to be eligible?" arguments to attempt to deflect Dr. Taitz's speculations that Barry was using a SS# never issued to him in HI.

25 posted on 02/25/2012 7:43:34 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
She's still going the fraud route, plain and simple.
The wrong way to go IMO.
YMMV
26 posted on 02/25/2012 8:00:25 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joined2Justify; All

“Will continue to keep praying about this.”

While you’re at it, please pray that Orly Taitz sees the light and adopts a supportive role in this issue in deference to other more competent, level-headed attorneys. I know her conscience and personality will not allow her to withdraw from the issue entirely and she need not do that. She has much to offer in the form of energy, ideas and resourcefulness.

I have worked with Orly Taitz in person and electronically. I admire her resolve and determination, especially in light of the fact that this is an adopted country for her. Ask yourself if you would be as committed to tilting at windmills upon relocating to a new country. She has plenty of guts and commitment.

However, as an attorney and spokesperson, she is not capable of getting this job done. Her thought processes, modes of expression and practices are not organized and disciplined enough to prevail in a US court. She is so angered by the injustice of this issue - as we all are - she has deomstrated time and again that she cannot stop herself from verbally lashing out at precisely the wrong time, invariably aggravating and alienating every public official she encounters. In so doing, she creates a very useful target for Obama apologists who use her shortcomings as a communicator to discredit the entire eligibility argument.

Although it is sad and unfortunate, in order for the eligibility movement to prevail, Orly Taitz must withdraw from the role of spokesperson - that is, assuming someone with a more conservative demeanor and skillful legal talent is prepared to step forward and be as relentless as she has been.


27 posted on 02/25/2012 8:26:27 AM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Orly cannot use a civil law eligibility hearing of any kind to bring criminal charges against Barry. The rights of the accused and the standards of evidence are totally different in a criminal case of fraud.

Arpaio, on the other hand, might just have found evidence to support a criminal action against Barry. Arpaio, unlike Orly, is understands and is experienced in criminal law and how to bring a prosecution of an accused person without violating their rights.

28 posted on 02/25/2012 9:11:52 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
“Although it is sad and unfortunate, in order for the eligibility movement to prevail, Orly Taitz must withdraw from the role of spokesperson - that is, assuming someone with a more conservative demeanor and skillful legal talent is prepared to step forward and be as relentless as she has been.”

IMO, Orly as a personality disorder that will preclude her from stepping down. Fortunately, others that stepped forward to pursue legal openings with more tactical probability of success, as with the two NBC cases in GA that were heard at the same time as Orly's.

IMO, only a dwindling few number of eligibility activists (mostly those who are legally illiterate) are willing to entrust their cases to Orly, much to the chagrin of Fogbowers who expect FReepers to be “shedding birfer tears” over having our “hopes dashed” each time Orly goes into court and fails. By now for most FReepers there are no expectations of success with Orly or tears when she fails.

Orly does articulate the NBC issue and Barry's appearance of identity fraud well in front of a camera, but she is hopeless in the courtroom as she has no concept of how to get witness testimony or evidence into a court record.

To the shock and horror of Fogbowers, Orly managed successfully to subpoena Barry in GA and appears to have backed him into a desperation no-show move which opened up the opportunity first for a possibly damaging default, but ultimately for the other two competent attorneys to get the NBC issue before Malihi without opposition from Jablonski and on track to go to SCOTUS.

29 posted on 02/25/2012 9:35:07 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

OT but need to clarify. You seem to be on top of these issues.
Ga. gave a stern warning about Obama’s FTA. Then ignored it. Now Indiana gave a stern warning for FTA. Did Obama appear, or a lawyer for him? I don’t understand this pattern. Is it just to make everyone think they are really serious about this issue? Info anyone!


30 posted on 02/25/2012 9:38:10 AM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7

Obama is the Fidel Castro of America, and how many court cases in Cuba succeeded in removing Castro?

the whole election process has been grossly contaminated and corrupted.

Time to use a different strategy.


31 posted on 02/25/2012 9:38:37 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
“Ga. gave a stern warning about Obama’s FTA. Then ignored it. Now Indiana gave a stern warning for FTA. Did Obama appear, or a lawyer for him? I don’t understand this pattern. Is it just to make everyone think they are really serious about this issue? Info anyone!”

The GA SOS warned Barry that Malihi would likely be offering the plaintiffs a default in lieu of a hearing which plaintiffs would be entitled to in the event of Barry's failure to appear either in person or through his lawyer.

That is exactly what happened. Malihi offered a default in lieu of a hearing. Orly, not being well-grounded in the law, misinterpreted that to mean that she would get BOTH a default AND a hearing. Hatfield and Irion appear to have realized that they would be waiving a right to default by going ahead with the hearing and they hoped that Mahihi would rule Barry was NOT NBC on the merits and not as a meaningless unopposed default.

Although the burden of proof was never ruled on by Malihi, at a minimum there is a burden of appearing to avoid default, UNLIKE in Indiana where there is NO requirement that a candidate appear to defend a challenge and IIUC the default is that in Indiana the candidate stays on the ballot unless the challenger meets the burden of proof. In Indiana, Orly did not present ANY admissible evidence to refute Barry's candidacy, but only speculation and unauthenticated hearsay documents and testimony.

32 posted on 02/25/2012 9:52:44 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Obama has all the power. Who ya’ gonna call?

Obama...Adolph Hitler in 'Blackface'.

33 posted on 02/25/2012 10:46:37 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Thanks for the info. I didn’t understand the non appearance in Id. That makes sense if thats the rule there. Sounds like they should have taken the default in Ga.
Any info on the Arizona Hearing on thursday. Haven’t heard a word.Even checked Barnett’s site. Nothing!


34 posted on 02/25/2012 12:06:45 PM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

They took us from within, just as they said they would.


35 posted on 02/25/2012 12:16:03 PM PST by Josephat (The old claim your evengelizing people who haven't heard the gospel, but go to a Catholic country tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

From the article “When Obama started using this stolen SSN he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah”

Lucy, I am positive researchers have looked into this name Soebarkah. But here is my quick research.

I went and found the document on web of deception. http://is.gd/qeeDYg Very Bottom one.

Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport renewal second page to amend to (include) or (exclude) and then in parentheses place basically who that person is to you. (wife) (husband) etc.

Soebarkah translated means son or something similar. Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) “who is this but the son of Lolo Soetoro? http://is.gd/OFQE7P

Obama was not known as Soebarkah.


36 posted on 02/25/2012 12:34:17 PM PST by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
“Sounds like they should have taken the default in Ga.”

I disagree. They were correct in refusing the default and demanding a hearing on the record on the NBC issue.

IMO, Jablonski, Holder and Barry would have preferred that Hatfield and Irion take the default because it would not have provided a path to SCOTUS on the NBC issue but would have provided Barry the opportunity to claim that the racist GA GOP admin had removed him from the ballot in a state he is quaranteed to lose anyway. Remember that it was GOP SOS Kemp who had the final say.

Taitz probably would have taken the default if she had known that she was giving it up to get a hearing. Her evidence was all hearsay (unauthenticated under FRE 902), inadmissible and therefore not “probative” (useful by the judge in making a ruling that would withstand appeal by Barry).

37 posted on 02/25/2012 1:01:26 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . Back to the thread. Begin at # 18 , and read through #37 .

[Thanks for the pings. Good work there.]

38 posted on 02/25/2012 1:15:38 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
BTW, Fogbowers were horrified when a regular member, “Balak,” (vouched for by Foggy Blade himself) went “birfer” and dared to suggest that Barry could have and should have shut down Orly this week by simply showing up and presenting a certified LFBC. “Balak” suggested that failure to present a certified BC in court could give amunition to “birfers.”

Producing Barry's BC in evidence is something that other prominent Fogbowers had suggested during the GA hearing as having been Jablonski's “secret plan” to humiliate the plaintiffs...right up until it wasn't.

Fogbowers can't tolerate any suggestion that the reason Barry hasn't produced a certified BC is he doesn't have one that hasn't been forged and fraudulently vouched for by HI DOH. For this, “Balak” was denounced and shunned by several notable Fogbowers, although others still defended him.

Reminding Fogbowers that Barry has NEVER produced his BC into evidence at any hearing caused some of them to react like Dracula being shown a crucifix!p>

39 posted on 02/25/2012 2:21:29 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

“And no court seems willing to “go on the record” and clarify what a Natural Born Citizen is.”

To date, at least 3 have. 3/3 say there is no two citizen requirement. Maybe because that is what the Supreme Court said in WKA...


40 posted on 02/25/2012 2:25:37 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

They did.

My personal irony is that my parents and grandparents escaped from the Reds, then Nazis, then Communists. All to go to what, at that time, was a beacon of light. Only to fall, within their and my lifetime.


41 posted on 02/25/2012 4:01:27 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7; LucyT; OafOfOffice; Flotsam_Jetsome; ProtectOurFreedom; Seizethecarp; john mirse; All

Thanks for the post; ping. Thanks to all linkers, researchers, educators. BTTT!


42 posted on 02/25/2012 5:47:02 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Liz; rodguy911; Fred Nerks; Red Steel; ...

Scroll down for some audio of the hearing proceedings.
It’s like listening to an old B movie from the 50’s ... histrionics, verbal jibes, threats and all.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/indiana-election-commission-obamas-moms.html

God help us ..


43 posted on 02/25/2012 7:40:01 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
he was most likely an Indonesian citizen as State Department documents prove that he was known as Soebarkah.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2728155/posts

Soebarkah

Lame Cherry ^ | 5/30/2100 | Lame Cherry

Posted on Wednesday, June 01, 2011 10:23:40 AM by mojitojoe

There has been so much written and conjecture on the forced out into the open Obama passport documents that I have not had much interest in exploring them in the name Soebarkah which appears on the document as one of the listed names of Barack Hussein Obama.........

44 posted on 02/25/2012 9:24:30 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7; All

Playing Devil’s Advocate here...

QUESTION: How did Obama’s social security number get assigned in 1890 if the Social Security Act was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935?


45 posted on 02/25/2012 9:46:31 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ednoonan7
Has Obama ever been a licensed driver from years ago until recently? I have never heard anything about him having driver's licenses and what info was on them as far as his name etc. If he has never driven that is peculiar in itself.
46 posted on 02/25/2012 9:52:12 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
"QUESTION: How did Obama’s social security number get assigned in 1890 if the Social Security Act was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935?'

Not sure where you read that typo, but I recall having seen it also. What is alleged is that the SSN that "Obama" is currently using was originally issued to a person (now deceased) born in 1890, and not to "Obama".

47 posted on 02/25/2012 11:25:40 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower
"If he has never driven that is peculiar in itself."

Seems like pretty much everything about this guy is peculiar, to say the least! Maybe his last driver's license was under the name Harrison J. Bounel.

48 posted on 02/25/2012 11:32:45 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

“What is alleged is that the SSN that “Obama” is currently using was originally issued to a person (now deceased) born in 1890, and not to ‘Obama’.”

Thanks, FJ. Obviously, I got the facts wrong. The person was not issued the SSN in 1890, but that is when that person was born. I appreciate you sorting me out.


49 posted on 02/26/2012 7:44:12 AM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

What is this person’s name?


50 posted on 02/26/2012 10:17:53 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson