Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland Dig May Reach Back 16,000 Years
Newsday ^ | 8-17-2004

Posted on 08/17/2004 6:05:45 PM PDT by blam

RAWLINGS, Md. -- Robert D. Wall is too careful a scientist to say he's on the verge of a sensational discovery. But the soybean field where the Towson University anthropologist has been digging for more than a decade is yielding hints that someone camped there, on the banks of the Potomac River, as early as 14,000 B.C. If further digging and carbon dating confirm it, the field in Allegany County could be among the oldest and most important archaeological sites in the Americas.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 16000; archaeology; back; clovis; dig; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; maryland; preclovis; precolumbian; reach; years
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: nmh

ah I see all of archeology, paleontology and physical history are wrong and all of the cross-proven dating that has been developed from the interlinked disciplines over the past 300 years is all wrong and the whole scientific community is stumbling around in ignorance.

Sorry. I didn't realize that. I stand corrected.


21 posted on 08/18/2004 8:55:43 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I'm actually cutting you a break since carbon 14 dating isn't exactly flawless.

Silly one ... . You defend something that is extremely faulty.


22 posted on 08/18/2004 9:42:30 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I'm actually cutting you a break since carbon 14 dating isn't exactly flawless.

Silly one ... . You defend something that is extremely faulty. It doesn't matter how many people still use it.


23 posted on 08/18/2004 9:43:05 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nmh

To calculate the radiocarbon age of a specimen, we need to compare the carbon-12/carbon-14 ratio now, with the carbon-12/carbon-14 ratio at the time of death. However, we do not know the ratio at the time of death, which means we have to make an assumption. Modern radiocarbon dating assumes that the carbon-14/carbon-12 ratio in living organisms is the same now as it was in ancient organisms before they died. In other words, the system of carbon-14 production and decay is said to be in a state of balance or equilibrium. Yet this assumption is questionable, even for an old Earth.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/defdocs/rr1993/r&r9310a.htm


24 posted on 08/18/2004 10:00:29 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson