Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Modern Humans Killed Off Neanderthals Quickly
http://www.foxnews.com ^ | Saturday, February 25, 2006 | AP

Posted on 02/25/2006 5:11:22 AM PST by ThreePuttinDude

LONDON — Neanderthals in Europe were killed off by the advance of modern humans thousands of years earlier than previously believed, losing a competition for food and shelter, according to a scientific study published Wednesday.

The research uses advances in radiocarbon dating to revise understanding of early humans, suggesting they colonized Europe more rapidly and coexisted for a much shorter period with genetic ancestors.

Paul Mellars, professor of prehistory and human evolution at the University of Cambridge and author of the study, said Neanderthals — the species of the Homo genus that lived in Europe and western Asia from around 230,000 years ago to around 29,000 years ago — succumbed much more readily to competition.

"The two sides were competing for the same territories, the same animals and fuel supplies and occupying the same cave spaces. With that kind of competition, the Neanderthals were always going to come out as the losers," said Mellars, whose paper was published in the journal Nature.

Modern humans — those anatomically the same as people today — were also better equipped to deal with a 6 degree Celsius (11 Fahrenheit) fall in temperatures around 40,000 years ago.

"Because they had better clothing, better technology(??) and a better mastery of fire, the humans were equipped to deal with it," Mellars said.

Mellars used the results of two recent studies of radiocarbon dating — a process of assessing age by counting radioactive decay of carbon in materials — to refine dates determined from fossils, bone fragments and other physical evidence that relates to the spread of humans.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bear; bears; cave; caveart; cavedrawings; cavepainting; cavepaintings; crevolist; evolution; genocide; godsgravesglyphs; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthals; radiocarbondating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last
To: ThreePuttinDude

"NOT COOL!"

21 posted on 02/25/2006 5:35:49 AM PST by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Mitochandrial DNA says their mother isn't.


22 posted on 02/25/2006 5:36:05 AM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ContraryMary

Its hard to tell from the diagrams but the Neanderthal skeleteon is much larger and thicker. From a design perspective, it looks like a structure that was designed to take a beating. But studying a fossil can only tell us so much, I'm sure that there was a lot more to the rise of humans than just bone size.


23 posted on 02/25/2006 5:36:27 AM PST by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
Better tools. The Neanderthals seem to have been reasonably intelligent but for some reason their tool-making skills remained static for hundreds of thousands of years, while humans made comparatively rapid advancements.

Neanderthal demise remains an enigma. Bigger, stronger, with more cranial capacity? Large displacements can be explained, but to vanish? With so many unpopulated places on the planet, it is unfathomable that they did not survive somewhere.

24 posted on 02/25/2006 5:36:36 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
What kind of technology did they have back then??

Arbeit Macht Frei.

25 posted on 02/25/2006 5:37:33 AM PST by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristotleman
The Neanderthals couldn't even invent a constant source of fire after 100,000 years yet they lived in a constantly predictable world, generation after generation.

Like pigs, monkeys, and earthworms I suppose.

26 posted on 02/25/2006 5:38:17 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

Spelling checkers??


27 posted on 02/25/2006 5:39:50 AM PST by Maj.Bertram.Pudgeman (Sorry, couldn't help it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
Neanderthals are us.

Not entirely a closed book, but cross pollination has been almost entirely ruled out.

28 posted on 02/25/2006 5:41:10 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

And redheads?


29 posted on 02/25/2006 5:43:48 AM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

The Smithsonian is in my back yard so I might have to swing by agian to see if they did indeed have better weapons. My statement was posed in the context of the authors general conclusions - that humans had better technology. I've seen a lot of TV reconstructions on Neanderthal society that stated that they weren't as underdeveloped as the media seems to constantly suggest, which is why the author raised my brow by suggesting that humans had better technology.


30 posted on 02/25/2006 5:44:05 AM PST by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude; RightWhale

Were any of them Jewish? We could be in big trouble ...


31 posted on 02/25/2006 5:44:52 AM PST by NicknamedBob (Islamists say we shouldn't make a mockery of religion -- funny, that's the problem I have with them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Neanderthals were very well-muscled but their average height of a male was 5'6". All signs indicate that despite the larger cranial capacity they were not more intelligent: inferior tool-making; inferior 'artistic' expression; inferior adaptability. If they were more intelligent, by whatever measure, then it seems clear enough that their arrangement of cognitive traits was less effective than that of humans. I would guess that they engaged in far less cooperative behavior and were far less inquisitive (based on certain archaeological evidence, such as a tendency not to travel far from home their entire lives).


32 posted on 02/25/2006 5:45:32 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: patton
Mitochandrial DNA says their mother isn't.

Pre-Brokeback, mothers were still required. Seriously though, interbreeding (if possible) doesn't explain planet wide reduction of Neanderthals. Being physically hardier, it would be expected that they would live at least on the edges of survival. Remember that large portions of the planet were barren of people, and not even explored until recent times. Yet zero Neanderthals.

33 posted on 02/25/2006 5:46:07 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
PS. Make that, an apparent tendency not to travel far.
34 posted on 02/25/2006 5:47:01 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
All signs indicate that despite the larger cranial capacity they were not more intelligent:

Concur. But its the why that is the question isn't it? I have often wondered if it doesn't have something to do with our arrested development. A 1000 pound animal can grow to adulthood and reproduce in two years, yet we take around 13 years to reproduce and fully 20 to reach adult maturity. For bare survival of the species, a short growth cycle is a powerful tool. A day old calf can be caught by a man on foot, but a three day old calf cannot. Human babies are essentially helpless for years, while they program their brains. If Neanderthal matured more quickly, they might survive better in very harsh environments, but never have the time to program those big melons. I'm aware of recent tests that say this isn't the case, but I wonder how conclusive those are.

35 posted on 02/25/2006 5:53:52 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
It may be that the neanderthals were killed this way but proof would be to find a site with 500 dead with their heads bashed in. Until then, this is just as believable:

Modern humans — those anatomically the same as people today — were also better equipped to deal with a 6 degree Celsius (11 Fahrenheit) fall in temperatures around 40,000 years ago..."Because they had better clothing, better technology and a better mastery of fire, the humans were equipped to deal with it,"

36 posted on 02/25/2006 5:55:18 AM PST by libertylover (Bush spied. Terrorists died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Ok, that deserves an answer -

I do not understand hou one can conclude that two genotypes of the same species, who coexisted, did not interbreed.

Remember, the definition of species is "cabable of breeding."

Furthermore, Many humans exhibit neanderthal traits - I do. If you put my skull up there, scientists would argue for years over which class it belonged in. Some traits of both.

Also, Neandethal had a brain volume of about ~1500cc, modern humand about ~1400cc. The argument that modern humans are smarter seems silly.

I don't know what happened, but it seems the simplest answer is that the two became one, by interbreeding.

37 posted on 02/25/2006 5:56:25 AM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
This would explain it:


38 posted on 02/25/2006 5:56:59 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

>>>>Modern Humans Killed Off Neanderthals Quickly

Ding dong the dems are dead!


39 posted on 02/25/2006 5:57:48 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Pre-Brokeback, mothers were still required.

LOL, perhaps those Neanderthals had too much of the gay cowboy gene - their fate was sealed!

40 posted on 02/25/2006 5:59:20 AM PST by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson