Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
I’ve stepped right into nothing. I’m looking at what has been put forth, and questioning the significance of the visible information contained within the image.
It’s no different from the laughable, gold-plated “analysis” from a now-discredited psychologist who apparently loves to take on spurious online identities to manipulate people, who had no discernable knowledge regarding file formats used in the graphic arts, despite presenting himself as possessing an advanced degree that would require such knowledge. I’m talking about Ronald Polland, of Florida. I’m not going to use any FR screen name, because I don’t even want to ping the b-tard, even though he’s opused and claims never to sign on again, under that FR screen name.
You accepted that, hook line and sinker. Do you know for a fact, that this image, at it’s base, is somehow a “forgery?” No, you don’t. You won’t know that until the subject of the photo of the scan is presented, and even then there is reason for suspicion.
This sort of crap is the reason I’ve tried to avoid any discussion directly relating to the whole, nonsensical “birth certificate” thing. It’s an intentional house of mirrors, filled with smoke, that’s gotten a lot of otherwise decent, intelligent people, such as yourself, stuck to a deliberate tarbaby, at the expense of applying the considerable knowledge and resources of FR to the known facts of the matter, relating directly to Constitutional eligibility, instead of some tangential snipe hunt.
Now, I apologize for the rant. You and I have had quite reasonable, even entertaining exchanges before, but you and I have had some that weren’t, back in the fall of last year, regarding this very online persona.
I told myself then, that I was quitting the “birth certificate” thing, to concentrate on the Constitutional aspect, and I should have listened to myself, this time.
But, I didn’t, and here we are, again.
Good luck, with whatever it is, that you hope to prove, with a JPEG of a photo of a scan of whatever it is you believe it to be.
THank you for the information about the seedless watermelons. I doubt that they would grow around here. I’ll have to check the farmers’ markets, thogh just out of curiosity. Locally the only melons I ever see home grown are like a large canteloupe, but different. They are very good.
Odd that you revert to assassinating Polarik's character when you avoid the FACT that there was no raised seal on the forgery as first represented by Obam's website, Daily KOS, and factcheck.
Your loyalties are coming more into focus as you work stealthily to shore up the lies of Barry Soetoro and his henchghouls. Attack Polarik all you like, but his work in exposing the forgeries has been verified as accurate. That must really frost your obamanoid butt. ZDoes it show on your messiah's face when he's told of it?
Continue to spin your wheels on this matter, that can't prove anything if it's genuine, and can't prove anything if it's fake. The Obama campaign carefully kept it at arms' length, if you bothered to notice.
I'll continue to pursue the Constitutional angle, as far as Obama's eligibility for office. It's the only angle that matters.
For the benefit of unfamiliar FReepers and lurkers, posting history is available by clicking on the screen name, then clicking on "In Forum." You'll see no basis for MHGinTN's peculiar attack upon me. You will, however, see plenty of reason to suspect the "authority" that caught so many FReepers up in trying to "prove" the forgery of a JPEG that has no probative value.
placemark.
I agree with you.
While all the supposition and scenarios are interesting, facts alone will expose this imposter.
For clarity, we need a list of known, provable facts, no theories.
I will start it:
1) A baby of mixed-race was born approximately 48 years ago.
Another website I’ve not seen before:
(or at least I don’t remember seeing)
From the September 2008 Idaho Observer:
http://proliberty.com/observer/20080904.htm
Nice try to spin away the reality. That ‘no value’ imagery fo forged documents was cited by a judge in order to deny a suit to cause your messiah to bring forth actual evidence that he is Constitutionally eligible. So, at least one idiot judge disagrees and places high value on the obvious forgeries you’re seeking to draw attention away from by slugsliming Polarik’s character rather than addressing the nature of the forgeries.
“I have no idea how the propagate them.”
Totally amazing.
I checked at the supermarket this morning for these guys. They haven’t arrived in Panama yet. But I will continue looking.
Thank you.
Twelve acres?
That is wonderful!
Yes, thank you for that information.
It sounds like a lot of extra work.
7c. -— Interesting
thanks for pointing that out! It's the first thing I thought of this morning...we are discussing a FORGERY!
Note this phrase "'who was allegedly tortured by British troops during the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya,' said Edward Heathcoat-Amory, a leading political columnist in the pro-Conservative Daily Mail newspaper Wednesday."
If Edward Heathcoat-Amory has proof of his story, why is it qualified as "allegedly?"
It may be because the allegations come from the words of family.
Try Lolo Soetoro, in absentia. (He died in 1987, the same year O decided to apply to law schools.) Acceptance was another matter.
That is a possibly actual registration which someone has taken the pains to erase data from so it appears blank.
Look carefully at line #22 ... the signature of the original that was erased bumped up inot the form printing and could not be erased without effecting the form printing. If you look carefully, much data is discernable from where erasures occurred.
So is it possible that Bo got some inheritance from his step father?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.