Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind
We will have a Tea Party congress no matter WHO the president is.
Amnesty for illegals ain't going anywhere so this hit on Newt is moot.
2 posted on
12/12/2011 4:54:18 AM PST by
Happy Rain
("The Founders obviously anticipated Obama when they crafted the 2nd Amendment.")
To: SeekAndFind
If you support amnesty, Newt is your man. The final bill, the grand bargain negotiated between Senate’s Acorn caucus and Newt will be great.
Once we have changed the electrorate, we can ignore those radical rightwingers and social engineers.
3 posted on
12/12/2011 4:54:31 AM PST by
heiss
(heartless and inhumane (radical rightwinger))
To: SeekAndFind
He means that the clowns insisting on rounding up and deporting 15 million illegals are unserious about finding a workable solution.
NO!
I will not engage in a circular debate that brings us back to this same point.
4 posted on
12/12/2011 4:56:01 AM PST by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: SeekAndFind
To call the author an American thinker is to redefine the word “thinker”.
This piece pedantic. The author does not agree with Newt. But this piece pretends its more than that.
5 posted on
12/12/2011 4:56:16 AM PST by
Notwithstanding
(1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
To: SeekAndFind
To call the author an American thinker is to redefine the word “thinker”.
This piece pedantic. The author does not agree with Newt. But this piece pretends its more than that.
6 posted on
12/12/2011 4:57:09 AM PST by
Notwithstanding
(1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
To: SeekAndFind
A law abiding illegal alien is an oxymoron.
8 posted on
12/12/2011 5:09:09 AM PST by
magslinger
(Who cares if they are"electable" if they are going to govern like Democrats? -noprogs)
To: SeekAndFind
I think we need to examine this whole “law abiding” issu also. Is it possible for an illegal for an illegal to live here and be law abiding?
Their 1st illegal entry carries little weight or consequence. Their 2nd is damned serious in the eyes of the law. Can they have lived here 25 years and not have perpetrated identity fraud or theft?
9 posted on
12/12/2011 5:11:11 AM PST by
umgud
To: SeekAndFind
Imagine a race of people who do not speak English, have no skills but physical labor and are encouraged by their own countrymen (for a small fee) to ‘follow me’ and I will show you a land of opportunity.
You must travel a long distance in sub-human conditions - will face starvation, dehydration, armed patrols and razor sharp barriers. If you survive - your housing, clothing and wages will be subsistence and you may be arrested as an invader.
By living quiety in the shadows and working hard for your new owner, this will become a paradise. The laws of this new land are supple and it will even be possible to acquire help from the government in the form of medical care, food and education for any children you have.
Imagine that.
10 posted on
12/12/2011 5:21:19 AM PST by
sodpoodle
( Gingrich - flying solo - without congressional baggage!!!)
To: SeekAndFind
I guess hacks think illegal is the norm because so many invest in it.
A vote is a vote no matter if it’s above the law.
11 posted on
12/12/2011 5:21:21 AM PST by
Vaduz
To: SeekAndFind
And do Daren Jonescu and SeekAndFind have a candidate that they are supporting?
13 posted on
12/12/2011 5:51:17 AM PST by
campaignPete R-CT
(I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
To: spectre; truthkeeper; processing please hold; antceecee; navymom1; jaredt112; Edgerunner; ...
15 posted on
12/12/2011 6:00:19 AM PST by
bcsco
To: SeekAndFind
Gingrich is not trustworthy on immigration issues. Period.
And immigration is killing us.
17 posted on
12/12/2011 6:00:51 AM PST by
SharpRightTurn
( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: SeekAndFind
illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for twenty-five years
Gingrich 'mesh-muddles' all around that number.
When one news person asks him about the '25 years', Gingrich says 'he didn't say that'. In another question, a newsie asks him, then, if 15 years is okay/too long/not long enough, and he responds that it should be more like 25 years.
Gingrich slithers through his responses on the issue, as the newsies try to pin him down on specifics.
==
Other concerns:
What about the 'boards'? Voluntary or paid. If paid, that is another level of bureacracy to handle millions of people and create panels to review their cases. What are the 'standards' for board membership? What are board regulations? Without those, a group of locals could just get together and approve any/all applications -- thus defeating the intent of the program.
What about 'Red Cards'? That will also add another layer of bureaucracy to handle and maintain* the millions of new applicants.
--
*Maintain? Does Gingrich honestly expect a Red Card program to be maintained, thus laws enforced, etc., or is this another governmental scam to legalize millions and then just forget about them -- basically like the GOV does with those over-extended on the current Visa program?
18 posted on
12/12/2011 6:03:15 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: SeekAndFind
Good....anybody around here truly believe that any one of us We the People CITIZENS who say, just happened to have forgotten to file our tax returns, for a few years, but otherwise are “completely law-abiding” ...would be treated equally as these NON-CITIZENS here illegally?
19 posted on
12/12/2011 6:03:21 AM PST by
mo
To: SeekAndFind
It’s really quite simple. All you do is ask the illegal how long they have been here and I’m sure they will tell you the truth. (sarc) This statement by Newt shows just how full of nothing he is. The Republican Party is done if they nominate him.
20 posted on
12/12/2011 6:04:57 AM PST by
Hattie
To: SeekAndFind
Do I want every illegal deported?
Heck, yes!
But I want the border closed first. This will never happen under Obama. I believe it will happen under Newt.
He and the other candidates are correct. Until the border isn't seeping through thousands of additional illegals a month, this continues to be nothing more than a verbal exercise.
I'm personally excited about his revoking hundreds of executive orders. He is one of the few folks to talk about it and the elimination of all the bogus, extra-constitutional Czars.
21 posted on
12/12/2011 6:05:13 AM PST by
TheWriterTX
(Hunkering down...)
To: SeekAndFind
I can’t see the need to have this in Breaking News unless you want a hit piece on Newt that won’t get buried.
24 posted on
12/12/2011 6:11:41 AM PST by
mmanager
To: SeekAndFind
I can’t see the need to have this in Breaking News unless you want a hit piece on Newt that won’t get buried.
26 posted on
12/12/2011 6:13:49 AM PST by
mmanager
To: SeekAndFind
Why do people keep saying he said they’d be US Citizens? Clearly he hasn’t said they’d be citizens. Just that they’d become legal residents.
I’m not defending his position, but at least call it what it is and describe the problem accurately.
28 posted on
12/12/2011 6:15:54 AM PST by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: SeekAndFind
If the choice is between Newt and Obama, I will leave that option blank and focus on state and local races.
After Newt sinks the Republican ticket (like John McCain) or destroys the Republican Party (like George W. Bush), I will be back to tell you I told you so.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
