Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Spacecraft Flyby Mystery" - Is Dark Matter the Culprit or is There a New Physics ...
Daily Galaxy ^ | 8/3/10 | Casey Kazan

Posted on 08/03/2010 12:48:20 PM PDT by LibWhacker

When scientists send their spacecraft across the universe, they save fuel by performing “slingshot fly-bys”. This is where, rather than firing up the thrusters, the craft changes its trajectory by harnessing the enormous gravitational pull of a planet. However, this trick has had an unexpected side-effect: it seems to produce a change in speed that no one, since it was first discovered in the early 1990's, can account for.

Experts are intrigued by the fact that while the acceleration is tiny and has no significant effect on NASA missions, it holds great interest because no explanation based on conventional physics and understanding has been found. The effect is so persistent that it could indicate some physics not considered in previous attempts to explain the motions of bodies in the universe.

In 1998, for example, NASA's NEAR Shoemaker spacecraft had its speed boosted by an additional 13.5 millimetres per second. There are many examples of this, but no explanation – which raises the tantalizing possibility that it could be a sign that a whole new branch of physics is waiting to be discovered.

Mysteriously, four spacecraft that flew past the Earth have each displayed unexpected anomalies in their motions. These enigmas join the so-called "Pioneer anomaly" as hints that unexplained forces may appear to act on spacecraft. The anomalous acceleration, resulting from a pull about 10 billion times smaller than the acceleration we feel from Earth's gravitational pull, was confirmed through detailed analysis of radio data from Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and Ulysses spacecraft as they hurtled out of the solar system, which seemed to experience a tiny but unexplained constant acceleration toward the sun.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory astronomer John Anderson and his colleagues — who originally helped uncover the Pioneer anomaly — have studied five deep-space probes — Galileo to Jupiter, the NEAR mission to the asteroid Eros, the Rosetta probe to a comet, Cassini to Saturn, and the MESSENGER craft to Mercury. Each spacecraft flew past the our planet to either gain or lose orbital energy in their quests to reach their eventual targets. (Galileo made two flybys.) In five of the six flybys, the scientists have confirmed anomalies.

JPL researcher Anderson, first saw the effect in 1980, but waited until he had accumulated data over the next 15 years, before he could easily dismiss it as the result of systematic errors. "Like a lot of problems in astronomy, many years of observation are needed," Anderson said.

Another researcher, Michael Nieto of Los Alamos, has long been interested in the possibility that gravity works differently on antimatter than on the familiar matter that makes up our everyday world. This led him to consider how well we understand gravity's influence on normal matter and whether studies of the motions of comets or spacecraft could be used to identify any deviations from the expected influence of gravity.

"I am feeling both humble and perplexed by this," said Anderson, who is now working as a retiree. "There is something very strange going on with spacecraft motions. We have no convincing explanation for either the Pioneer anomaly or the flyby anomaly." The one probe that did not confirm an anomaly was MESSENGER, the spacecraft approached the Earth at about latitude 31 degrees north and receded from the Earth at about latitude 32 degrees south.

The five other flybys involved flights whose incoming and outgoing trajectories were asymmetrical with each other in terms of their orientation with Earth's equator, which "suggests that the anomaly is related to Earth's rotation," Anderson told the Times Online. As to whether these new anomalies are linked with the Pioneer anomaly, "I would be very surprised if we have discovered two independent spacecraft anomalies," Anderson told SPACE.com. "I suspect they are connected, but I really do not know."

"Another thing in common between the Pioneer and these flybys is what you would call an unbound orbit around a central body," Anderson said. "For instance, the Pioneers are flying out of the solar system — they're not bound to their central body, the sun. For the other flybys, the Earth is the central body. These kinds of orbits just don't occur very often in nature — it could be when you get into an unbound orbit around a central body, something goes on that's not in our standard models."

Scientists were hoping to gain more insight into the anomaly when the Rosetta spacecraft swung by Earth on Nov. 13 2009 to pick up a gravitational boost for its journey to rendezvous with a comet in 2014.

However, in a major disappointment – which had deepened the mystery — the Rosetta spacecraft did not experience the flyby anomaly during this swingby of Earth in 2009, even though the same spacecraft did experience the anomaly when it flew by Earth 2005, but didn’t in 2007.

“It’s a mystery as to what is happening with these gravity events,” said Trevor Morley, lead flight dynamics specialist working on Rosetta. “Some studies have looked for answers in new interpretations of current physics. If this proves correct, it would be absolutely ground-breaking news.”

Several ideas have been proposed in an attempt to explain why the anomaly occurs, ranging from tidal effects of the near-Earth environment, atmospheric drag, or the pressure of radiation emitted or reflected by the Earth, to much more extreme possibilities, such as dark matter, dark energy or previously unseen variations in General Relativity.

Anderson and colleagues are even looking at the possibility that Earth’s rotation may be distorting space-time more than expected, and affecting nearby spacecraft. But there is as yet no explanation how this could happen.

Stephen L. Adler of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, thinks that the universe's "missing" dark matter might be culprit that's messing around with our robotic explorers. Alder suggests that the Earth may be passing through "clouds" of WIMPs -elusive Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPS) that have been theorized to contain large quantities of matter, hence a large proportion of the dark matter in our universe- giving some weight to the idea that dark matter may be contained in the volume of space surrounding Earth. As spacecraft orbiting Earth passes through this dark matter ring, perhaps there will be some complex interaction causing this sudden change in acceleration.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: anomaly; astronomy; flyby; framedragging; gravity; mystery; physics; pioneer; science; slingshot; space; spacecraft; spaceexploration; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Full title is: "The Spacecraft Flyby Mystery" - Is Dark Matter the Culprit or is There a New Physics Waiting to be Discovered?
1 posted on 08/03/2010 12:48:30 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

To tell you the truth, it sounds like a simple miscalculation in their math. If they simply add the extra 13mm per second, the unexpected acceleration goes away.


2 posted on 08/03/2010 12:51:31 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Dark matter?

That’s RACIST!


3 posted on 08/03/2010 12:52:19 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's the answer: A Correction to a Famous Equation
4 posted on 08/03/2010 12:53:52 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Alder suggests that the Earth may be passing through "clouds" of WIMPs...

Well, that explains the origin of the Obama administration...

5 posted on 08/03/2010 12:55:12 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I KNEW he wasn’t from this planet!


6 posted on 08/03/2010 12:55:49 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
To tell you the truth, it sounds like a simple miscalculation in their math. If they simply add the extra 13mm per second, the unexpected acceleration goes away.

It's not so much a miscalculation, as something missing in their perturbation models. I don't know if they account for relativity effects, for example -- but if they're not, they'll see an error.

It all boils down to the source of the error. It might be nothing more complicated than trajectory determination error.

7 posted on 08/03/2010 12:59:47 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Obviously, we don't know everything. Still, the mechanics and precision used by the rocket science types is absolutely amazing. For example, Voyager 2 took 12 years to reach Neptune and arrived at a precise location only 1 SECOND different than what had been predicted. Heavy, heavy stuff.
8 posted on 08/03/2010 1:01:33 PM PDT by JPG (Journolist diva, Sarah Spitz? No, she swallowed the whole Mongrel agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It’s called torsion fields. All rotating bodies create them while spinning.


9 posted on 08/03/2010 1:02:34 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

NASA, come on guys! The evidence is right in front of you!

Obama’s Gravitas
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2008/analysis-obamas-gravitas.html

The confirmation is right in this article: “Stephen L. Adler of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton...suggests that the Earth may be passing through “clouds” of WIMPs”

There you have it! The WaPo tells us of Obama’s gravitas and a Princeton (Ivy League, you know!) astronomer tells us that it might be caused by WIMPs.

Voila! Mystery solved; it is Obama’s fault. Just factor his current location on the planet when the spacecraft does its fly-by and all the orbital calculations work out just fine.

If only there had been a satellite fly-by on Obama’s birthday then a really good astronomer/astrologer could tell us what side of the planet he was born. Hmmmm, inquiring minds want to know! /sarc


10 posted on 08/03/2010 1:03:28 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("There are consequences for being wrong" - Burt Rutan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Richard Hoagland talks about it.

Part 1
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun.htm

Part 2
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun2.htm


11 posted on 08/03/2010 1:04:22 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JPG

The most exciting thing going these days doesn’t get much play. The New Horizons probe is more than halfway to its Pluto flyby.


12 posted on 08/03/2010 1:05:08 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“Tower, this is Ghost Rider requesting a flyby.”

“That’s a negative, Ghost Rider, the pattern is full.”


13 posted on 08/03/2010 1:05:09 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It’s be funny if they found out that aether existed after all.


14 posted on 08/03/2010 1:05:17 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This posts are rediculous. First, it pre-supposes these guys no how things work and that something is behaving very oddly, the truth is they don’t know jack squat about “space”. How long ago was it we decided Pluto wasn’t a planet? This is the least reliable field of the sciences, and full of ignorant and arrogant people, IMHO.


15 posted on 08/03/2010 1:08:07 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

These posts are rediculous. First, it pre-supposes these guys no how things work and that something is behaving very oddly, the truth is they don’t know jack squat about “space”. How long ago was it we decided Pluto wasn’t a planet? This is the least reliable field of the sciences, and full of ignorant and arrogant people, IMHO.


16 posted on 08/03/2010 1:08:27 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Several ideas have been proposed in an attempt to explain why the anomaly occurs, ranging from tidal effects of the near-Earth environment, atmospheric drag, or the pressure of radiation emitted or reflected by the Earth,

It's called the Goron Effect, or in simple laymans term's "Global Warming" causing the pressure increase in radiation emitted or reflected.

17 posted on 08/03/2010 1:09:22 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
When scientists send their spacecraft across the universe, they save fuel by performing “slingshot fly-bys”.

Sheesh. Across the universe? Nothing's been sent across the universe yet. Not even the galaxy, much less the diameter of the solar system.
18 posted on 08/03/2010 1:09:49 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
True...it's really flying. The problem at Pluto, with all that speed, is it really cuts down on the observation time. Too bad it doesn't have brakes.
19 posted on 08/03/2010 1:12:20 PM PDT by JPG (Journolist diva, Sarah Spitz? No, she swallowed the whole Mongrel agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
To tell you the truth, it sounds like a simple miscalculation in their math. If they simply add the extra 13mm per second, the unexpected acceleration goes away.

That would be a fudge factor.

The problem is that current models produce very accurate predictions for, inter alia, earth satellites, without fudge factors.

Gravity models are extremely well characterized as are the effects of solar radiation and other heavenly bodies. They explain and predict the orbits of artificial down to centimeters per day, or very small fractions of a millimeter per second, in the order of 0.005 mm/sec. 13.5 mm/second is HUGH, SERIES!

Unless you tell where in the model you think the 13.5 mm/second belongs, which parameters you care to modify and how your results are consist with satellite observations, your suggestion is useless.

It is provocative that all the anomalies occur on hyperbolic orbits, orbits for which the smaller body has escape velocity. Sir Isaac would be perturbed, since his laws, corrected by Dr. Einstein, used to work in both cases.

20 posted on 08/03/2010 1:12:54 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson