Update: VIDEO WARNING TO ALL WOMEN ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON GARNERS YouTube WEEKLY 'HONOR' (Thanx, FR)

What kind words. Thank you so much, papasmurf. :)

I'll give your excellent idea some thought.

We must get this information about the clintons to the legions of uninformed, misinformed and disinformed women... and, to a lesser extent, men. (Men are both better informed and repulsed reflexively by this creature.)

One idea I have is an e-mail campaign that will target this demographic, which is, btw, the demographic being targeted by the clinton machine, the demographic missus clinton MUST get to have any chance of retaking the WH in '08.

goto:
WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
(ICKES + ESTRICH PROVIDE ROADMAP--oops!--FOR HILLARY DEFEAT)

also:
WOMEN-VOTE 'NO' TO HILLARY-The power of harasser, abuser, rapist depends on the silence of women. (post 46)

41 posted on 03/18/2007 5:58:08 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

I don't claim I am younger than my years, I assert I look younger than my years. Despite what the young lady from Dublin says!

Off to Mass here, have a nice day!

42 posted on 03/18/2007 6:48:25 AM PDT by jla

wasn't talking about you... ;)
and your point is precisely my point.

When people claim that they are younger (by n) than their chronological years, they present themselves as an older-looking x, instead of a younger-looking x + n.

44 posted on 03/18/2007 7:21:55 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

Brilliant YouTube video! Sending it on to be sent on - Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton and her disgraced husband represent no one except the Anti-American/Communist element and them selves.

45 posted on 03/18/2007 7:56:58 AM PDT by yoe

Bravissima, Mia! Congrats again for the honors and you don't look a day over 24.

46 posted on 03/18/2007 8:55:35 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)

Thanx, yoe. Appreciate your forwarding of YouTube video link.

Also note my original post on FR.
(The video here is a longer version of YouTube video.)

VOTE SMART

MY RESPONSE TO
'VOTE DIFFERENT'
(Obama-Apple 1984 Ad Mashup)

by Mia T, 3.10.07

47 posted on 03/18/2007 8:58:29 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

Mia - your posts are simply Awesome, thanks!

May I ask, what got you going on Hillary as you seem so very passionate about not having her in the White House? I agree, but you are the one doing something about it!

Keep up the good work.

48 posted on 03/18/2007 9:00:22 AM PDT by Sonora

MIA,
I don't always get your art (I'm not smart enough) but I respect it very much.
You have a gift and a passion and you use it.
You're down with the struggle.

49 posted on 03/18/2007 9:09:19 AM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)

Thank you, Sonora.

what got you going on Hillary--Sonora

I was onto clinton fraudulence immediately. (I happen to know the former president of the League of Women Voters who moderated the presidential debates in '92. She thought--erroneously as history would later prove-- that the clintons were the greatest thing for America since sliced bread. I told her at the time that she was very wrong.)

With the clintons' reflexive abuse of women, their willful terrorism utter failure, their rampant abuse of power, what began as an instinctive distrust of the clintons quickly became outright revulsion and horror.

Once this determination had been made, what else could I do but help to expose the clinton menace?

50 posted on 03/18/2007 9:25:16 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

thanx, Ramcat. You are too humble and kind. (I'm sure the problem is more my clarity than your comprehension.) ;)

51 posted on 03/18/2007 9:29:04 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

Thanks for the history. Well, you are doing an excellent job at hammering and re-hammering home the facts. It's strange to me that so many people cannot see through the Clinton's, especially when they are so very transparent to millions of us. I pray that she doesn't get into the White House. I just hope that the Republican candidate goes after her like there is no tomorrow, if Hussein doesn't take her out before that. A few of 'our' candidates, in my opinion are not up to that task (McCain, Romney) but the others seem ready and willing. Just take off the gloves.

52 posted on 03/18/2007 11:20:34 AM PDT by Sonora

The Obama-Apple 1984 ad mashup is inspired (altho, as I argue with my response, incomplete).

Of course, the original Ridley Scott Apple 1984 ad that introduced the Mac to the world is sheer genius. And its foreRunner, Blade Runner, provides yet another glimpse via Ridley Scott's brilliance into a possible dystopian future.

Ridley Scott's dystopian vision captures perfectly what a future with the clintons at the helm would look like. (That is, if we have a future at all: We will not survive another clinton. Indeed, we may yet not survive the first.)

And this is why the 1984 ad remix is so devastating for hillary clinton.

HILLARY CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE SYNDROME:

A recent Saturday Night Live skit is similarly vitiating for clinton.

Its force is attributable, in part, to the reflexive nature of the response to absurdity.

Perhaps not literally—yet—but Missus clinton was, indeed, laughed off the stage at that 'town hall' meeting in Iowa.

And therein lies the problem for missus clinton.

If the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video taken together make plain the absurdity of a hillary clinton commander-in-chief, ⁴ the Iowa misstep reinforces it.

Watching the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video in succession confirms the obvious: The pundits and pols are asking the wrong hillary! question.

The fundamental question concerning missus clinton's candidacy isn't "Can she win?"... or "Will she win?"... or even "Should she win?"

No. The fundamental question is this: "Can missus clinton be taken seriously? Is missus clinton's candidacy more than simply a bad joke? Is missus clinton's candidacy legitimate? "

By asking the other questions, legitimacy is the presumption, the unasked question, the "When did you stop beating your wife?" sort of fallacy.

But the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" clip taken together belie that presumption.

The reason the Saturday Night Live sequence is so devastating is that it is not the usual SNL farce based on fact.

Rather, it is fact based on farce.

And missus clinton's "I'm in!" video confirms it.

Let down the curtain: the farce is done. (Rabelais)

Somebody stick the fork in that baby, already. Please.

ADDENDUM:

This exchange on Hardball underscores the farcical condition of the hillary clinton candidacy. Pay special attention to Howard Fineman.


READ MORE:

HILLARY "I'm in" CLINTON'S 'CONVERSATION' WITH SELF
(OKAY HILLARY. LET'S TALK.)
~with commentary from Saturday Night Live
by Mia T, 01.22.07

also: THE PUNDITS AND POLS ARE ASKING THE WRONG HILLARY! QUESTION...

HILLARY! Can a chintzed-and-powdered villain win the White House?
LEADING INDICATORS SAY 'NO'
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART SIX
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART SIX

HOW MANY TIMES IS HILLARY GONNA BE CONFUSED BY MEN?: Chris Matthews
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART FOUR

HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK
'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART THREE

'EVIL AND BAD MEN' A LOSE-LOSE FOR HILLARY!
(MISSUS CLINTON'S 'SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE' PROBLEM-PART 2)

WHY HILLARY'S IOWA MISSTEP CAN SINK HER
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM

The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes.

The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and should-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.

Mia T, 10.27.05
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)

unning vicariously, as we have argued, has its risks.

What was supposed to be Hollywood propaganda to make a hillary presidency marginally palatable has instead become a parable about missus clinton's own dystopian future.

ABC announced the other day that it is pulling "Commander-in-Chief" off the air "until spring." Missus clinton's proxy presidency, you see, has been in a ratings free fall ever since "American Idol" took it on.

In a perverse life-mirrors-art moment, support for the real-life missus clinton's presidency has plummeted, too. This even sans Rudy, her real-life "American Idol" opponent.

'Ars artia gratis.' Please!

Samuel Goldwyn must be turning over in his grave....

'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?
by Mia T, 02.02.06

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

53 posted on 03/18/2007 11:40:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

54 posted on 03/18/2007 5:07:53 PM PDT by Aria

...and your point is precisely my point.

I've always been confident that my good sense would rub off on you.

55 posted on 03/18/2007 5:31:07 PM PDT by jla

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then what is plagiarism????

56 posted on 03/18/2007 5:33:06 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez (Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)

Is this video being attributed to the Obama campaign?

57 posted on 03/18/2007 5:39:40 PM PDT by gotribe ( I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution... - Grover Cleveland.)

Thank you, Mia, for all the work you do for ALL OF US!

58 posted on 03/18/2007 5:49:10 PM PDT by presently no screen name

59 posted on 03/18/2007 5:50:02 PM PDT by bmwcyle (It is time to stop the left at the wall.)

Hi Mia,

I just "collected" the "original" Obama (Apple Computer) ad. It was great.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QViJwZwXTl0

And so someone said that you did a remake of that one. I saw that one and was going to download it, too -- to my iPod.

But, the YouTube flash files are always so crummy (low quality). Do you have a high quality (i.e., "original") version that you can put out for downloading. That would be great.

Otherwise, I'll just go for the YouTube copy...

Thanks,
Star Traveler

60 posted on 03/18/2007 6:23:20 PM PDT by Star Traveler

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794