Skip to comments.
Police Begin Fingerprinting on Traffic Stops
wBay ^
| 12/15/07
| Sarah Thomsen
Posted on 12/23/2007 3:29:05 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Date published taken from the page source, so it might not be accurate. Doesn't look like it was ever posted though.
Anyone in Green Bay had this done to them yet?
To: LibWhacker
How do we know someone won’t use those fingerprints in theft identity?
2
posted on
12/23/2007 3:31:30 PM PST
by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: LibWhacker
Citizens do have the right to say no. "They could say no and not have to worry about getting arrested," defense attorney Jackson Main said. "On the other hand, I'm like everybody else. When a police officer tells me to do something, I'm going to do it whether I have the right to say no or not."
You might just end up on the hot end of a taser.
3
posted on
12/23/2007 3:32:14 PM PST
by
kinoxi
To: LibWhacker
OK,you’re not required to provide a fingerprint.Those who are stopped should be told this in clear terms by the cop making the request.
4
posted on
12/23/2007 3:35:47 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: LibWhacker
Freedom comes at a cost. Law-abiding citizens may have to be willing to go to jail to fight this kind of tyranny. But at some point, either you fight it, or the tyrants just tighten the noose.
5
posted on
12/23/2007 3:36:11 PM PST
by
IronJack
(=)
To: LibWhacker
Unless the police are arresting me and take me to the lock up I will not "give" them my fingerprints.
And yes, I realize that not "giving" them my fingerprints may result in just that.
Not because I'm afraid of some database. Shoot, being a veteran my fingerprints are already on file.
Because they have no need of them for a minor violation.
6
posted on
12/23/2007 3:37:16 PM PST
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: LibWhacker
What’s next?? Blood samples and DNA verification for speeding tickets??
Another slippery slope...
7
posted on
12/23/2007 3:38:59 PM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: LibWhacker
Just another step on the road to totalitarianism.
8
posted on
12/23/2007 3:40:18 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
To: IronJack
9
posted on
12/23/2007 3:40:21 PM PST
by
CGASMIA68
To: Bean Counter
“Another slippery slope...”
we are in freefall.
10
posted on
12/23/2007 3:42:44 PM PST
by
tired1
(responsibility without authority is slavery!)
To: LibWhacker
No fingerprint, well then how about a bit of tazer?
11
posted on
12/23/2007 3:42:53 PM PST
by
Mark was here
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
To: LibWhacker
How do I prove I’m not an illegal? Well “official” documentation of course. How do I prove that the “official” documentation isn’t forged? Well fingerprints of course? Retinal scans? Urine tests? But of course I have the right to refuse... if I don’t want to drive a car, or if I don’t want to work. Like it or not, that’s the path ahead I expect.
12
posted on
12/23/2007 3:44:07 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: LibWhacker
I remember reading that when Social Security was first proposed way back when, that most Americans did NOT want a government number to be used to identify them. The government, of course, said that would never happen.
Fast Forward. These days you can't even open an account ANYWHERE without that Social Security Number.
To: LibWhacker
An’t no way in hell you’re going to get mine this way.
Sheeple - that’s another story.
14
posted on
12/23/2007 3:47:05 PM PST
by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: kinoxi
Many things done by the gubmint is done in the interest of “conditioning” the sheeple to more intrusive enforcement or downright violation of your rights. Another example would be seeing more cops wearing military apparel and carrying assault weapons. Using drivers licenses as proof of identity instead of ability to operate a vehicle. Tasering citizens at the first sign of sarcasm.
15
posted on
12/23/2007 3:48:02 PM PST
by
Boiling point
(The Indians had a bad immigration policy and look what happened to them!)
To: IDontLikeToPayTaxes
Yup, my Social Security card states "not to be used for identification purposes".
Yeah, right. Had to give it to renew my driver's license last month.
16
posted on
12/23/2007 3:50:20 PM PST
by
mombonn
(God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
To: Mark was here
No fingerprint, well then how about a bit of tazer? Say hello to my leetle sparking friend!
To: LibWhacker
Are Green Bay police permitted to ask about legal residency in the country?
18
posted on
12/23/2007 3:54:39 PM PST
by
VR-21
To: LibWhacker
And what if I refuse to be fingerprinted?
19
posted on
12/23/2007 3:57:40 PM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
To: LibWhacker
If you want law enforcement to crack down on the illegals, they are going to have to have the tools to identify a citizen from a non citizen. Are you ready for it?
20
posted on
12/23/2007 4:02:05 PM PST
by
kempo
(I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson