Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
That’s why I said “approximately.” And I should have said “male baby.”
Is there proof that she went to Cambridge, or just the hearsay evidence from the friend who said she was traveling thorough Seattle on the way there to meet her husband?
Corsi article @ WND re missing six months in life of Ann Obama
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317622/posts
You make claims that I cannot possibly know the forgery is a forgery, yet I can easily refute your sycophantic whine with just a magnification which shows no raised seal on the first forgery placed on line for your messiah.
In contrast, hoosiermama put up an image of what she called a blank BC, but it is obvious it had data that was removed to make it look blank, yet the raised seal is visible when magnification is used on the jpg! You're here spinning for your disgusting affirmative action liar.
Now, spittle on and expose yourself some more, obot! Have a few more punches at that 'attack the source and misdirect from the object' methodology. You go out of the way to smear Polarik when he isn't the issue. And you know he's not the issue, so you're disgusting in the main.
To me, it's clear that you've gotten sucked into a shell game. The "blank form" posted above shows clear evidence of having information cloned out in an amateurish manner, but that in and of itself does nothing to prove that the image is geniune, or a forgery. The "raised seal" is comprised of pixels, and you're responding to an illusion that may or may not represent the physical reality of the object, assuming there actually is such an object. It's entirely possible to create such a thing from scratch, as I've pointed out.
And, if you don't want to accept what I'm saying, then please recall the image of the purported document in question that circulated a while back, that had THREE "raised seals" in a row. So, they were clearly added to the document. Now, how might one go about isolating the pixels that created such a thing? And, how might one go about stepping and repeating the security pattern in the background to remove such a thing?
Are you really not able to see how much fakery you're getting caught up in, above and beyond the assumption that the "COLB' or whatever, is "forged?" To what end? Looking at the source, I've concluded that it was, by design, put out there to preoccupy folks such as yourself, kind of like one of those joke beverage coasters that say "Please See Other Side" on both sides.
So, it really is a house of mirrors. But, you seem to enjoy it there. Have fun. I've said my peace.
As a ‘last worder’, your obsession must be fed. Your continued spinning to blur the reality of your messiah is quite revealing. And your pernicious jello on the wall game is also interesting. Just so you realize how stupid you’re looking, if someone posts an image of a document they claim to be a blank and thus useable for filing information if applied to the form, seeing the image of the raised seal invalidates the claim. That is the issue with the faked CoLB you want to divert attention from. You know it, I know it, and the entire reading public of this thread know it. Spin somewhere else, obot. You’re stealth curtain is no longer hiding you now.
LOL, looking at the linebacker he's married to, I might throw that into question, but Larry Sinclair vouches for it, so I suppose you're within the known facts.
All humor aside, we know:
1) He was born, somewhere.
2) His name is uncertain, due to questions over marriage and adoption.
3) He was raised largely by Mr. Stanley Dunham and Mrs. Madelyn Dunham, as far as what is in evidence.
4) He has a known history in Hawaii, in later childhood.
5) All his formative and college years were filled with various political radicals, including every known family member.
6) He attended various colleges and universities, but records of this have been withheld.
7) He was elected to the Illinois state legislature.
8) He was elected to the US Senate.
9) He was elected President.
What gaps are there in this, as far as what is literally known, with incontrovertible evidence to back it up?
This is the whole article:
This seems to be a detailed, documented source.
The Obama Timeline: 1961-2008
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/10/26/the-obama-timeline-1961-2008/1/
News from another thread. We’ve all been looking under the wrong name. Our pres. is actually Irish, family name O’Spamo.;~)
Accounts I read had Lolo penniless and living on Stanley Ann’s charity at the end of his life. She arranged to have him admitted to a hospital before he died. I don’t think he had money, unless he had hidden it all these years in secret bank accounts.
It is not the hearsay from Susan Blake. I believe it is from a news report in a Chicago Paper. Although I have no recollection of what their source was. It originally came up when the Susan Blake interview was being dissected on the Long Thread--her recollection about the reason for the Seattle trip was wrong because he didn't go to Cambridge until August of 1962. A follow on to that was that she had in fact had her own trip there as well but it was in a later period. I haven't looked at that for some time--I don't really view it as a critical fact and haven't looked at the evidence.
That was in part responsive to the comment about abuse; but I suppose it would also be an important fact establishing the historical relationship--as has often been pointed out here, there is very little evidence about the relationship between Sr. and SADO.
So Obama put out a FAKE COLB on purpose, just to give us something to do? Did he also invent his foreign citizen father so we would investigate the NBC issue?
You give these people WAY too much credit. I know we JOKE about Obama being the “Messiah”, He really ISN’T.
He’s just an arrogant to the max bully with an overdose of chutzpah. He bluffed his way into the white house and is trying to force his socialist, Stalinist, Marxist, radical ideas on to the American people. Chutzpah and bravado only get you so far and Obummer has reached the end of his rope. (can I say that?). The tide is turning in the public continuousness, the town halls, the states, the courts, the military, even in the unwitting main stream news media. The jig is up (can I say that?). It is only a matter of time now that it has started to unravel. I suspect a relative short period of time. When this happens, it will be like the heavens opened and poured out a biblical FLOOD of pent up information to the American people. After this flood takes place, he won’t last a month. His own supporters will turn on him trying to salvage their own careers. He won’t have a friend in the free world. BUT, don’t feel too sorry for him. There is always Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, and North Korea to call home. He’ll fit right in.
2. From http://antimullah.com/ and viewing the 2 Vids posted he has some well stated issues. Worth the time to view. To me the most interesting comments were concerning Use of Certification in Vid 1 and HI Health Officials statements VS media spin in Vid 2. Sometimes 'how' something is explained gives better clarity.
I have never thought the newspaper Birth Announcements were significant. If they are real--so what? They say exactly what they would say if they acknowledged he was born in Kenya. A and B had a child they named C--they live at xyz. Nothing about a Doctor or Hospital. Nothing of any substance.
It would be significant if you could prove there was no announcement--it would cast doubt on the fairy tale. Looks at this point as though it may be difficult to do that although an original copy of one of the newspapers that had a different announcement in that space might be effective.
From your mouth to God's ears . . .
It has occurred to me recently that the adoring press coverage of Michelle has been rather subdued lately. Hopefully the worm is beginning to turn.
It could be that OBUMMER has out the breaks on his old lady, fearful that she would put her foot, ah no — take her foot out of her mouth and say something that’ll bring the whole house down.
I haven't seen or read anything to indicate that Lolo was "penniless." There was one mention of Ann helping him to get admitted to a US hospital (in California, I believe) for treatment, but that was offered by way of illustrating how the two remained friends after the divorce.
Do you have a link to the "penniless" reference?
No, no link. I read it a long time ago and it could have been just as you say. I might have “inferred” the penniless part. It could have been in Jerone Corsi’s book, the Obama Nation. I’ll see if I can find it.
You are correct, thank you.
From “Dreams...” — page 26, last paragraph:
“I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school. It’s a short piece, with a photograph of him. No mention is made of my mother or me, and I’m left to wonder whether the omission was intentional on my father’s part, in anticipation of his long departure. Perhaps the reporter failed to ask personal questions, intimidated by my father’s imperious manner; or perhaps it was an editorial decision, not part of the simple story that they were looking for. I wonder, too, whether the omission caused a fight between my parents.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.