Posted on 04/28/2003 11:15:02 AM PDT by deport
Two Judges Face the Heat
Excerpts from Roll Call; April 28, 2003Senate Republicans are expected to try to force votes on two of President Bushs top judicial picks this week, testing Democratic will to maintain simultaneous filibusters and likely imperiling working relations between the two parties for the foreseeable future.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) is expected to seek confirmation votes on Miguel Estrada and Priscilla Owen as early as Wednesday, a one-two political punch designed to highlight Democratic opposition to the GOPs minority and women judicial candidates.
The only way we can get traction on this issue is a sustained effort to focus our members, the press and our constituencies on it, said a GOP leadership aide. If that takes moving forward on a number of judges concurrently to sustain attention that is what we will do.
But Democrats vow to dig in and continue to block confirmation votes on each nominee, citing the White Houses refusal to release memos from Estradas days as a Justice Department lawyer and their outright opposition to Owens nomination.
Even as they stall Estradas nomination, Democrats said they will call on Frist to immediately call up the nomination of Edward Prado, a Hispanic that Bush nominated to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Feb. 6. Prado was reported out of committee on April 3 without any dissent from Democrats.
Ranit Schmelzer, a spokeswoman for Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), said Friday that Daschle informed Frist prior to adjourning for recess that he could go along and bring [Prado] up because he would pass. Frist did not bring Prados nomination up for a floor vote, and he remains on the Senate calendar ready for a vote
But Frist said in an April 11 interview that he was not going to allow Democrats to set the legislative agenda and determine the judicial voting schedule.
Im not going to let them cherry pick, then filibuster groups of people and not give me some time agreements [on final votes], Frist said.
The Majority Leader also dismissed chatter that he was holding back Prados nomination to score political points against the Democrats.
As people come to the executive calendar, those that are nominated by the president, I am going to try to take them just one by one and I tried to do that [before recess], Frist said. They wont give me unanimous consent time agreements on any of them.
This element of obstruction, that is not even frustrating to me it is just a matter of fact, Frist added.
So far, Democrats have successfully defeated several cloture votes on Estrada, who was renominated by Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Jan. 7 after his nomination languished in the Democratically controlled Judiciary Committee in the 107th Congress. But it would be the first time the Senate, as a whole body, would have an opportunity to vote on Owen, whom the president has nominated to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Bush originally picked Owen for the lifetime judicial appointment in the 107th Congress, but her nomination was defeated on party lines in committee last fall. She was renominated Jan. 7 and approved under Republican rule along a party-line vote on March 27.
Democratic-aligned interest groups have planned a Thursday rally to denounce Owens nomination.
On Monday and Tuesday, opponents will hold news conferences to condemn another one of Bushs judicial nominees, Jeffrey Sutton, seeking a seat on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He, too, was originally nominated in 2001 by Bush for the Circuit Court. Sutton, as a private lawyer, has argued cases against the Americans with Disabilities Act, invoking strong feelings from several Senators and disabled Americans.
Despite strong opposition to Sutton from some within the Democratic Caucus, the Senates leading liberal acknowledged that Sutton would likely be confirmed when the Senate votes on his nomination Tuesday.
I would expect that he would pass, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, said during a domestic policy briefing with reporters last week.
Kennedy, however, said there was near unanimity among Democrats to oppose Owen, adding that he couldnt recall a single Democratic Senator speaking out in favor of her nomination during Caucus meetings before the recess.
As for Estrada, Schmelzer said that Democrats have made their position on Judge Estrada very clear. They asked for additional documentation, and the White House refuses to turn over that documentation.
For Democrats to sustain filibusters on both Estrada and Owen, they must ensure that only 59 Senators support each nominee.
A Republican Judiciary aide said there is a question of whether it is unconstitutional to force a judicial nominee to achieve a supermajority of 60 votes, as Democrats are requiring in these two cases, to win approval.
Still, the GOP aide predicted it is a political miscalculation on Democrats part to sustain a double filibuster.
If one party is saying that you must think a certain way for us to value you as a member of our party, that is a political risk the Democrats are willing to make and we are happy to invite that, said the aide.
(A) senior Democratic aide said party leaders are not worried about the decision to filibuster Estrada and Owen.
That party does not have a great deal of credibility with minorities, the aide said.
But the aide acknowledged a judicial fight on these two nominees this week could result in long-term negative consequences.
What happens [this] week undoubtedly will raise us to another level, said the aide, referring to existing bitter relations between both parties.
A GOP aide agreed that failure to reach agreement on these two nominees soon is likely to result in a serious meltdown in the Senate chamber.
Floor Schedule
through April 28, 2003
In adjournment until 12:00 p.m. Monday, April 28, 2003
12:00 pm: The Senate will be in a period of morning business for one hour.
1:00 pm: In executive session, consider the nomination of Jeffrey S. Sutton to be a U.S. Circuit Judge for the sixth circuit.
Thanks for the heads-up...appreciate it.
Related Articles: and past Senate Democrats obstructionism
A Legacy Worth Fighting For [re: judiciary]
Source: CNSNews.com Published: April 28, 2003; Author: Paul M. WeyrichThe Constitution Be Damned - Democrats try to impose a religious test on judges
Source: WSJ OpinionJournal.com; Published: April 22, 2003; Author: Brendan MiniterThe Democrats Big Plan
Source: National Review; Published: April 3, 2003; Author: Byron YorkFilibuster Si, Estrada No!
Source: Weekly Standard; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Major GarrettTalking Nonsense - The Senate Filibuster
Source: BreakPoint with Charles Colson; Published: March 13, 2003; Author: Mark EarleyEstrada & the Dream
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 12, 2003; Author: René FonsecaPresident Calls for Action on Judicial Nominations
Source: White House Office of the Press Secretary Published: , March 11, 2003.Miguel Estrada: The President Must Take His Case To The People
Source: CNSNews; Published: March 11, 2003; Author: Paul M. WeyrichLeft-Wing Democrat U.S. Senators Thwarting The Will Of 'We The People'
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: March 10, 2003; author: Wallace HonleyEstrada and the future of the judiciary
Source: Washington Times; Published: March 10, 2003; Author: Nat HentoffSupermajority Rules?: Why the Estrada filibuster is unconstitutional
Source: Wall Street Journal; Published: , March 8, 2003; Author: Douglas W. KmiecBarbara Stanley: Hillary Barks Her Marching Orders To Democrats: Bork Miguel Estrada!
Source: Toogood Published: March 7, 2003: Author: Barbara StanleyDems: We Dont Really Want Answers from Estrada.
Source: National Review; Published: March 4, 2003; Author: Byron YorkThe Minority Democrats' War In The Senate For Control Of America
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: Febraury 28, 2003; Author: Mary MostertSenate Democrats: Filibusters Are No Longer Just For The Floor
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: John NowackiSenator Leahy's Comments on Senate Floor against Estrada (26 Feb 2003) (Revised)
Source: The Congressional Record (New Search required each time); Published: 27 Feb 2003; Author: | Sen Patrick Leahy (D-VT)Ted Kennedy's Grand Design
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 27, 2003; Author: Robert D. NovakLinda Chavez: Republicans Need To Call Dems' Bluff On Estrada Nomination
Source: CNSNES.com; Published: February 26, 2003; Author Linda ChavezSenate Democrats Can't Get Their Facts Straight
Source: CNSNews.com ; Published: February 14, 2003; Author: John NowackiEstrada: Now Its War
Source: National Review Online; Published: February 12, 2003; Author: Byron YorkLeahys Surprise Attack
Source: National Review Online; Published: October 9, 2002; Author: Byron YorkShedded by Judiciary: Senate Democrats cast off another appointee
Source: Wall St Journal; Published: October 9, 2002Miguel Estrada May be Next Victim Of Judiciary's 'Gang Of Ten'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: September 09, 2002; Author: Paul M. WeyrichToward Priscilla Owen, Not Even The Pretense Of Fairness
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: August 01, 2002; Author: John NowackiThe Owen Nomination: Liberals Don't Let Truth Stand In Their Way
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: July 18, 2002; Author: John NowackiDemocrats Hold Judicial Nominations for 406 Days and Counting
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published: June 21, 2002; Author: Christine HallJudge The Senate Judiciary Committee Not By What It Says, But What It Has Done
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: | June 06, 2002; Author: John NowackiThe Left Keeps Trying -- And Failing -- To Smear Brooks Smith
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: May 16, 2002; Author: John NowackiPickering Battle Places Congress on Verge of 'Institutional Crisis'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 07, 2002; Author: Jeff JohnsonMake them pay for 'Borking': David Limbaugh rebukes spineless Republicans to support Pickering
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: March 5, 2002; Author: David LimbaughThe GOP's Post-Pickering Strategy
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 1, 2002; Author: Byron YorkPickering Fight Shows Liberals At Their Worst
Source: Roll Call.com; Publblished: February 21, 2002; Author: Mort KondrackeStill Pestering Pickering
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 19, 2002; Author: John NowackiDismantling Democracy through Judicial Activism
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 12, 2002; Author:Tom Jipping'A Troubling Pattern': Ideology Over Truth In Judicial Confirmations
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: February 10, 2002; Author: Paul E. ScatesDemocrats Blast Bush Judicial Nominee
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published: February 08, 2002; Susan JonesThe Next Big Fight: The first major judicial-confirmation battle of the Bush administration.
Source: National Review: Published: Feburary 6, 2002; Author:Byron YorkSYMPOSIUM Q: Should the Senate Take Ideology into Account in Judicial Confirmations
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 4, 2002;
Authors:
Ralph G. Neas -- YES: The ideology of nominees for the federal judiciary matters more now than ever
Roger Pilon -- NO: Since judges apply law, not make it, the Senate's concern should be with judicial temperamentWhat is the Judiciary Committee Trying to Hide?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 29, 2002; Author: Thomas L. JippingBlasting Conservative Judges: Liberals Launch Their Campaign
Source: cnsnews.com; Published: January 24 2002; Author: Matt PyeattJudicial Confirmation Lies, Deception and Cover-up
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: December 11, 2001; Author: Thomas L. JippingSenator Leahy Does Not Meet His Own Standards
Source:.cnsnews.com; Published: December 07, 2001; Author: By John NowackiSenator Daschle Must Remove 'Leaky Leahy' From Judiciary Committee
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 4, 2001; Author: Rev. Louis P. SheldonA Disgraceful Blocking of Nominees
Source: The Wall Street Journal (ltr to ed) Published: December 3, 2001Mr. Leahy's Fuzzy Math
Source: Washington Times;Published: December 3, 2001; Author: EditorialSen. Patrick Leahy; Our Constitutional Conscience?
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 2, 2001; Author: Paul E. ScatesJudicial confirmations called significantly low
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 30, 2001; Author: Audrey HudsonPatrick Leahy - Words Do Kill
Source: PipeBombNews.com; Published: November 29, 2001; Author: William A. MayerJudicial Profiling
Source: The Wall Street Journal; Published: November 27, 2001Sen. Leahy's judicial hostages
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 21, 2001Judges Delayed is Justice Denied
Source: CNSNews.com ; Published: November 20, 2001; Author: Thomas L. JippingPartisanship is Prevalent with Leahy's Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 15, 2001; Author: John NowackiLeahy And Daschle Are Coming Face To Face With Their Own Words
Obedient Democrats
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published October 26, 2001; Author: Thomas L. JippingWhy is Daschle Blocking Judges needed to Try Terrorists when we Catch them?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: October 26, 2001; Author: Mary MostertPat Leahy's Passive Aggressive Game
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 25, 2001; Author: John NowackiOperation Obstruct Justice
Source: Washington Times; Published: October 25, 2001; Author: T.L.JippingDaschle wins struggle over judicial nominations
Source: The Washington Times; Published: Oct 24, 2001; Author: Dave BoyerLeahy doctrine ensures judicial gridlock
Source: Washington Times; Published October 22, 2001Senate's judicial powergrab: Tom Jipping tracks Dems' assault on courts
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: June 28, 2001; Author: Tom JippingDems Will Shut Down Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the Free Congress Foundation; Published: June 13, 2001; Author: Thomas L. Jipping
All of this is based on the baseless assumption that the Senate Republicans have the testicular fortitude to make this into a real fight.
Oh that's right .. they fit their agenda
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.