Why Hillary's Iowa Misstep Can Sink Her:Missus Clinton's Saturday Night Live Problem(Part 2 @ 156)

hillary clinton, FoxNews, Washington Post | 01.29.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

 

WHY HILLARY'S IOWA MISSTEP CAN SINK HER
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM

by Mia T, 1.29.07

ell, it didn't take long for missus clinton, off-leach—(sort of)—to step in it.

On reflection, it will become clear that what is being spun as a little Iowa faux pas is in fact a huge blunder with national implications and the potential to sink the clinton candidacy.

All the more surprising when one realizes that the visit to Iowa by this Thatcher pretender,¹ this wannabe-commander-in-chief, ² was more a micromanaged toe-dip than a bold foray.

Watch the blunder as it unfolds. Notice how the crowd initially laughs at her, not with her. Notice, also, her initial cluelessness.

COVERAGE... OR JUST COVER?

It is revealing that clinton sycophant, Ann Kornblut of the Washington Post, formerly of The New York Times, quickly mischaracterized the blunder thusly:

Asked by a voter what qualified her to handle leaders from countries such as Iran and North Korea, Clinton began her reply, then stopped and, for effect, repeated the question.

"What in my background equips me to deal with evil and bad men?" she said wryly, prompting peals of laughter from the audience. [emphasis mine]

Missus clinton repeated the question not wryly, but cluelessly, totally oblivious to its deeper implications.

Ms. Kornblut's revision is giving missus clinton and her house-of-cards candidacy cover. Not for the first time, either. ³ (ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY: THE ALTERNATE [sic] UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT)

On a superficial level, this misstep is an early indicator that missus clinton will not survive her tin ear, her lack of mental agility, her clumsy lack of candor, her baggage... and, of course, her Q score.

With a Q score—a measure of celebrity likability among the hoi polloi—in the toilet, missus clinton can win elections only by running virtually unopposed...

And then only with the help of protheses, props, poses, PR machines, scripted appearances, screened audiences, vetted questions, Secret Service barracades, secret police, softball settings and sycophantic hosts... fictionalizing, 'humanizing,' digitizing and otherwise hiding the real hillary clinton.

And then we have the baggage....

Anyone else but a clinton would have been summarily laughed off the stage.

HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note
(WHAT THE HELL IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA ANYWAY?)
by Mia T, 01.26.07

 

I neglected in the above analysis to consider the reflexive nature of the response to absurdity. Perhaps not literally—yet—but Missus clinton was, indeed, laughed off the stage at that 'town hall' meeting in Iowa Sunday.

And therein lies the problem for missus clinton.

SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE SYNDROME

If the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video taken together make plain the absurdity of a hillary clinton commander-in-chief, ⁴ the Iowa misstep reinforces it.

Watching the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video in succession confirms the obvious: The pundits and pols are asking the wrong hillary! question.

The fundamental question concerning missus clinton's candidacy isn't "Can she win?"... or "Will she win?"... or even "Should she win?"

No. The fundamental question is this: "Can missus clinton be taken seriously? Is missus clinton's candidacy more than simply a bad joke? Is missus clinton's candidacy legitimate? "

By asking the other questions, legitimacy is the presumption, the unasked question, the "When did you stop beating your wife?" sort of fallacy.

But the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" clip taken together belie that presumption.

The reason the Saturday Night Live sequence is so devastating is because it is not the usual SNL farce based on fact.

Rather, it is fact based on farce.

And missus clinton's "I'm in!" video confirms it.

Let down the curtain: the farce is done. (Rabelais)

Somebody stick the fork in that baby, already. Please.

ADDENDUM:

This exchange on Hardball underscores the farcical condition of the hillary clinton candidacy. Pay special attention to Howard Fineman.

HILLARY "I'm in" CLINTON'S 'CONVERSATION' WITH SELF
(OKAY HILLARY. LET'S TALK.)
~with commentary from Saturday Night Live
by Mia T, 01.22.07

also: THE PUNDITS AND POLS ARE ASKING THE WRONG HILLARY! QUESTION...

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

Clinton Administration Veteran:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran

Hillary Clinton?
Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man?

Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998)

Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks.

Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down?

Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.

Sean Smith
Fresno, Calif.
Salon.com

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005, 2007

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

 

---

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[EternalHope]

Well done.

SHOULD Hillary! win. Of course not. But to think merely being an awful candidate and an awful person will be enough to stop her is naive.

The MSM will cover up every mistake.

Unless the Republicans can come up with a very strong candidate, she WILL win.

[Thermalseeker]

Unless the Republicans can come up with a very strong candidate, she WILL win.

At least she finally admitted that Bubba is a bad and evil man.....

[pissant]

If Obama or any of her dem opponents want to sink the beeyatch in the primaries, there is more than enough ammo to do so w/o even doing much research.

[Chaguito]

Sorry, gotta agree with the NYT on this one. It was a wry response, and clever to boot.

[HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath]

I think the Blundering One is finished before she gets started.

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[jla]

Do you know I never doubt you, or what you are, not for even a second.
There are those times though when I might wish to nudge you back onto the straight 'n narrow. The proper course for a fair lady. :^)

[geo40xyz]

ping

[Lee'sGhost]

The Iowa faux pas was a demonstration of what we all knew. Hillary is the punch line for almost any issue she talks about. Her life has been too much of joke to take anything she says seriously. If we want a president we can laught at, Hitlary's the one.

[Mia T]

thank you.

I agree. The Rs, left to their own institutional devices, reflexively pick losers.

What we need: Competence, credentials to fight the war, real achievements, character, appeal across party and charisma/star power. I can think of only one R who meets all those criteria.

What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking?
Pre-clinton thinking, that's what....
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations.
We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first one.)

[Nancee]

"...it will become clear that what is being spun as a little Iowa faux pas is in fact a huge blunder with national implications and the potential to sink the clinton candidacy."

I just do not agree with this!! This "woman" will be the candidate for the RATS!!! It's just that simple. I would to God I am wrong, but I don't think so!

[gulfcoast6]

But, But, But, she is the worlds smartest woman, remember?

[Mia T]

right on, Lee'sGhost

[fullchroma]

Bump!

[Mia T]

If the Ds are dumb enough, or cowered enough, she will be. But she is too much of a joke to be taken seriously in the general election.

[Miss Didi]

I was so hopeful that she stepped in it with this gaffe, but then I saw the front page of the Post and it made her seem like a lovable card.

Keep up the good work, Mia! It's going to be a long, bumpy ride that could drive us all to drink.

[Mia T]

thx fullchroma :)

[Old_Mil]

John Edwards will be the democratic nominee. Wait and see...

...the guy has the charisma and the rhetoric to pull it off. In fact, I'm rather surprised that it was Kerry and not Edwards who got their nomination last go around.

Clinton and Obama - in championing universal health care - have stepped in it. This isn't something that the baby boomers want any more than it was when Hillarycare was first mentioned.

Instinctively, jokes about the government resonate well with the common man, regardless of his voting pattern. The last thing he wants is that competency extended to his bypass surgery.

[OKSooner]

Thanks for the ping as always, Mia.

Fun stuff especially when juxtaposed this with her "deck your opponent" statement...

[andonte]

I knew Margaret Thatcher. I was a friend of Margaret Thatcher. Hillary, you are no Margaret Thatcher.

It's wrong to say the two names in the same sentence.

Go home, Hillary, you wretched woman.

[Disambiguator]

What we need: Competence, credentials to fight the war, real achievements, character, appeal across party and charisma/star power. I can think of only one R who meets all those criteria.

Please edify us.

[Mia T]

Thanks, Miss Didi.

It will be impossible for old media to revise her every misstep.

But even more significant, because it is patently obvious that hillary clinton is simply not a credible commander-in-chief, there is nothing old media will be able to do to hide this plain fact from the electorate.

[Incorrigible]

Information overload as usual Mia! I'm just starting to appreciate that font you're using!

[Mia T]

excellent points.

[OKSooner]

"Competence, credentials to fight the war, real achievements, character, appeal across party and charisma/star power. I can think of only one R who meets all those criteria."

I know a couple of people who are thinking alike.

Generally, I like Rudy also; he's the kind of guy I'd want for mayor of my home town. He's also who I'd want on my side if the mob were after me. Immigration and a couple of other issues are important to me, though, but I agree that Rudy's the one that people are going to just like.

No doubt, he's a face-value personality. What he says is what he means...

[Nancee]

"...she is too much of a joke to be taken seriously in the general election."

The Clintons have both been a joke from day one, yet they were put in the People's White House once, and he wasn't thrown out of office for the most offensive behavior!! What is different now? What makes us think that this "woman", who had twice been elected by the people of New York State to the U.S. Senate, will not be able to lie, kill, cheat, and whatever else she has to, to be elected to the Presidency?

You know I would so much like to see her laughed right straight out of politics altogether, but the population is simply so dumbed down; too dumbed down to give her what she deserves!!

[Miss Didi]

Thanks, Mia...I'll keep the faith and soldier on, as we all must do.

[Mia T]

Fun stuff especially when juxtaposed this with her "deck your opponent" statement...

I just posted one on that, too. ;)

THE CLINTONS 'DECK' WOMEN AND OBAMA. TOO BAD THEY DIDN'T 'DECK' OSAMA.

[Nancee]

"John Edwards will be the democratic nominee. Wait and see..."

I hope you're right, but I just don't see it given the pattern and the history of these two criminals. Plus, John Edwards does not give me a lift!

:-)

[Old_Mil]

Generally, I like Rudy also; he's the kind of guy I'd want for mayor of my home town...What he says is what he means...

That's good to know.

"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine."
-Rudy Guliani

Rudy! An Investigative Biography of Rudolph Giuliani
Wayne Barrett

[Mia T]

We must remain unified against her. One thing is certain: The clintons will try to divide us.

 

From HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON: WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY:

This brilliant Alinsky-clinton observation by beyond the sea is the perfect segue to an analysis of Alinsky's influence on hillary clinton... which leads inexorably to hillary rodham's closely guarded Wellesley thesis. (Plan to do an extended piece on that shortly.)

In the Wellesley thesis, hillary discussed "how to change the American political culture." This discussion occurred in the context of a tribute to the leftist political organizer, her mentor, Saul Alinsky.

Does missus clinton reveal her own thoughts on the radicalization and even balkanization of the American political process? We can't yet say with certainty because the thesis has been sealed--closed to public scrutiny--from the moment missus clinton insinuated her radicalizing, balkanizing, liquidating self onto the national political stage.

If I had to guess, I would say she adopted Saul Alinsky's theories and practices without modification: hillary clinton exhibits no creativity, no vision of her own and tends to glom onto the latest fashion, whether it's Alinsky's Stalinist methods... or New Age occultism, recall her attraction to the teachings of

• Marianne Williamson, who some described as a "Jewish charismatic spiritualist"
• Ken Scott Nateshvar, yogi to the stars
• and the pièce de résistance, Jean Houston, the Director of the Foundation for Mind Research.

Houston was described by some as a "New Age" author who "studied psychic experiences and mystical connections to historical figures and other worlds." When the story of the Houston connection became public Houston became known as hillary clinton's "Eleanor Roosevelt Conduit."

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch (or its facile alliteration).

by Mia T, January 3, 2006
Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers
+ Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000

There is a great emotional likeness there too. Thank you for putting the photos side by side.

On Alinsky (http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html)

For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting what is wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don't have the power to change a bad situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer -- especially a paid organizer from outside -- must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a bad situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."--beyond the sea

[pinz-n-needlez]

When I first saw this clip, it looked and sounded like Feminist Hillary condemning all men, with a wind and a nod to other 'knowing' women, as being wicked and evil.

I did get a kick out of seeing her 'make' the decision to join in the laughter. You can almost hear her reptilian brain thinking, "What would a human do?"

[Mia T]

thanx, prof H ;)

[trillabodilla]

I don't underestimate her, nor do I underestimate the stupidity of the American people, at this point.

God, give us wise, moral, clear thinking, sensible leaders, who are more concerned with the American people than with their own lust for power.

[melancholy]

The only way to keep her out is to win in Iraq by bombing Iran, fast.

Other than that, the Dole-ish Republican field doesn't have a candidate to coalesce around and defeat the witch.

One good thing though, the witch, winning or losing in '08, will destroy a lot of RATS and their party in her wake!

[doc30]

Unless the Republicans can come up with a very strong candidate, she WILL win.

Watch for a Clinton/Obama ticket. Very scary.

[Mia T]

Washpost.

Did you play the video?
Watch her. Listen to her apres-blunder news conference.
Missus clinton, herself, said she was being serious.

[Mia T]

missus clinton was slow on the uptake--again.
she then 'amended' her story...

[firewalk]

I just can't listen to her...
here's a bttt though

[Nancee]

"The only way to keep her out is to win in Iraq by bombing Iran, fast."

I just read where our good President has warned Iran to stay out of Iraq. What do you think??

[Mia T]

BTW, I have another cut from that video that is even worse. Total non sequitur on the war.

Did she think no one would notice? (The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.)