Posted on 01/08/2008 11:55:32 AM PST by seanmerc
C'mon get real. You deny there is not a major problem with gangs comprised of black people-especially young men? White men do not normally belong to gangs. Kid's age 13. yeah the local Amish gang is really a threat.
Sorry, I am no longer 8 and my father is no longer infalible as this instance explicitly illustrates.
“Paul’s defense has been that he didn’t actually write them.”
Sounds a lot like “I vas just following orders. . . “
Did you Neocons also believe Anita Hill?
Ron Paul: US "military is mowing civilians down in the streets"
RON PAUL ACCUSED U.S. TROOPS OF WAR CRIMES IN DESERT STORM
Ron Paul: Israel bought Jesse Helms
Ron Paul: Traitor had direct line to President Reagan
Related:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1950362/posts
See post #110- it was a Freeper who originally did a lot of the footwork on this, finding and scanning the original newsletters.
A lot of those statements of Paul’s are actually true, not racist. But the ones he’s going to really get hammered with, IMO, are these two, which are over the top:
“I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city [Washington, D.C.] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”
“We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational.”
}:-)4
You might want to read the post below your post.
He’s a anti-semite and a bigot.
HIT IT’S WEAKPOINT FOR MASSIVE DAMAGE!
And Mussolini made the trains run on time.
Actually he didn't, the credit belonged to his predecessor. But he took credit, just as Paul took credit for these newsletters whether he wrote each article or not.
That isn’t the point at all. Whether I agree or not makes no difference.
What matters is what Paul meant, whether he agrees now, and how he responds.
So far, he has gotten by without really confronting the questions.
He can’t do that anymore, imo.
I think he just said what many are afraid to say!
BS, Idiots of all racial backgrounds belong to gangs. It is not about what race they are, it is about their being stupid enough to belong to a gang.
Gang culture is everywhere, sometimes it just has different names, ALF, ELF, Greenpeace, Anarchists, rEVOLution, whatever.
>The New Republic piece has already been posted. This summarizes the NR piece and has some other startling revelations. Methinks Paul is in trouble...<
Methinks you need to come back and answer some of the posts that have been sent to you so you don’t look like a coward.
After the last round of hoopla about "100's of photo-ops for Stormfront" I wrote off the whole anti-RP crowd.
How can the powers that be and the supporters of main stream Republican candidates be so afraid of a man they say will never win?
If he has no chance to win or gain a national support, why is it so necessary to write vile and distorted articles about him?
If he is nuts and all of him supporters are nuts or kooks, why is it that instead of being ignored, a massive (and I mean massive) effort is being made to discredit him?
ping
Me neither.
Is he a “HOMOPHOBE” as well?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.