Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link

orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

[rxsid]

Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.

Barry's Kenyan B.C.??

Special Motion for leave

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)

[EnderWiggins]

It's a photoshopped fake. Here's the original photo it was forged from:



http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/ss/welcome_to_kenya_sign_2.htm

[rxsid]

ya think?

/s

[little jeremiah]

Okay, let’s get some technical experts on this!

[little jeremiah]

I wonder who runs the Urban Legends about 0bomba website. Could it possibly be a leftist organization - nah.

[rxsid]

"I wonder who runs the Urban Legends about 0bomba website. Could it possibly be a leftist organization - nah."

Yeah. I'm sure they are just as credible as the two basement lefty hacks a/k/a snopes.

[Windflier]

I’m surprised to get a response on a thread this old, but I suppose that cyberspace is forever.

You make a good point, and I’m sure that I thought the same when I was actively studying this. I’ve now lost all track of where this issue stands. The interest and excitement around this issue has died off a lot, as one lawsuit after another has been thrown out of court.

I thought that the suit brought before Judge Carter in San Diego had the best chances of success, but then he rolled on us. I took my attention off the issue after that.

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.

[rxsid]

Rush mentions the "B.C." in passing, again:

"Story #6: Blogger on Obama and Tilikum the Killer Whale

RUSH: A blogger… Who is this guy? Bungalow Bill. Bungalow Bill commenting on the unfortunate death at Sea World yesterday where that whale pulled the trainer in there and it was over: "We Know More About Tilikum the KILLER Whale in Five Hours, Than We Knew About Obama Before the Election ... The mainstream media failed to report on Obama's college days, his birth certificate, his drug use, his associations with Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, his connections to ACORN, his participation with the Annenberg project, how he used the courts to win earlier elections, his direction towards communism, racial beliefs, and all the dirty little secrets hidden so Obama could assume office. Now that he is president, the mainstream media still fails to dig deeply into the healthcare plan, the stimulus plan, and all the other controversial bills leading towards socialism."

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_022510/content/01125104.guest.html

[Natural Born 54]

Looks like this thread may finally have a conclusion. For anyone checking back here for updates, this link apparently once and for all provides the answer to the question "Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C....":

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2457491/posts?page=3108#3108

... and the answer is "No."

But the truth is out there and we're still looking.

[STARWISE]

Good job!

[Natural Born 54]

Maybe not, STARWISE. Fred Nerks says it is not the same document and I respect his opinion. So this thread ain’t over yet - probably.

[Natural Born 54]

STARWISE, the Lucas Smith obtained birth certificate has still not been discredited. In fact, there is more reasons now to think it may be the real b.c.

For anyone wanting to know why, begin reading this other thread at this point:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2457491/posts?page=2436#2436

...and continue reading at least through all the posts of March 7, 2010. (Sorry, there is no quick way to explain it.)

This is a correction to my post #10,689.

[STARWISE]

“Is this really it? (re: possible Obama’s Kenyan B.C....”:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2457491/posts?page=3108#3108

... and the answer is “No.”

~~~~

The only certainty we know is all we don’t yet know.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

For the record:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0319103malcolmx1.html

Testimony
Auoptsy report
Autopsy photo

Better Malcolm Little (x) Autopsy photo here:
http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art4/0319103malcolmx1.jpg

Credit for last link—> Fred Nerks

[rxsid]

Taitz files an amendment to the Taitz v. Obama QW suit, after passage of the "health care bill.":

"VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S RIGHTS UNDER 5 USC 552 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER 42 USC 1983, 42 USC 1985

RICO

VIOLATION OF COMMERCE CLAUSE AND OF PLAINTIFF’S RIGHTS TO GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT AS A DOCTOR OF DENTAL SURGERY UPON DEFENDANT’S IMMINENT SIGHNING OF THE HEALTH BILL HR 3590 and HR 3962

Respondent/Defendant – Barack Hussein Obama, hereinafter “Obama”, Acting President of the United States and Commander in Chief, who refused to present in any court of law or to the public any vital records that would show his eligibility as for US presidency based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution, as one born in the United States to two citizen parents without allegiance to any other sovereignties[emphasis in complaint]. From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.

...

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

I. What is Respondent Obama’s standard and burden of proof of his birthplace under Quo Warranto and ethical duties? - Considering Obama’s first cousin Raela Odinga, Prime Minister of Kenya, sealed alleged records of Obama’s birth in Mombasa; while the State of Hawaii holds Obama’s “original” sealed birth records, allows registration of births out of State, allows registration based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence and seals original birth records [emphasis in complaint].

II. Does the State of Hawaii’s withholding Respondent’s Obama’s original birth records by privacy laws breach the U.S. C ONST . by obstructing constitutional rights duties of the People to vote, and State and Federal election officers to challenge, validate & evaluate qualifications of presidential candidates based on legally acceptable and not fraudulent records and the President Elect., per U.S. C ONST . art. II § 1, art. VI, & amend. XX § 3?

III. Does the restrictive qualification for President of “natural born citizen” over “citizen” include allegiance to the U.S.A. from birth without any foreign allegiance, as required of the Commander in Chief in time of war to preserve the Republic, including birth within the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. to parents who both had U.S. citizenship at that birth, and having retained that undivided loyalty?

IV. Does birth to or adoption by a non-citizen father or mother incur foreign allegiance sufficient to negate being a “natural born citizen” and disqualify a candidate from becoming President?

V. Having attained one’s majority, do actions showing divided loyalty with continued allegiance to the foreign nationality of one’s minority evidence foreign allegiance sufficient to disqualify one from being a “natural born citizen” with undivided loyalty to the U.S.A., such as campaigning for a candidate in a foreign election, or traveling on a foreign passport?

VI. Does a presidential candidate or President Elect by default fail to qualify under U.S. C ONST ., art. II § 2 and amend. XX, § 3, if they neglect their burden to provide State or Federal election officers prima facie evidence of each of their identity, age, residence, and natural born citizenship, sufficient to meet respective State or Federal statutory standards?

VII. Do candidates for office disqualify themselves if they seek office under a birth name differing from a name given by adoption, or vice versa, when they neglect to provide election officers prima facie evidence of legal changes to their name, or if they neglect to legally change their name?

VIII. Does a President elect fail to qualify through breach of ethical disclosure duties, and obstruction of election officers’ constitutional duties to challenge, validate and evaluate qualifications for President, by withholding or sealing records evidencing identity, age, residency, or allegiance, or by claiming privacy and opposing in court efforts by Electors, election officers, or the People to obtain and evaluate such records?

IX. Does misprision by Federal election officers cause a President Elect to fail to qualify, if they neglect or refuse to challenge, validate, or evaluate qualifications of Electors or a President Elect, being bound by oath to support the Constitution and laws, after citizens provided information challenging those qualifications via petitions for redress of grievance, or by law suits?

X. To uphold its supremacy and inviolability, and to preserve the Republic, does the U.S. Constitution grant standing to Citizens to bring suit or quo warranto over negligence, obstruction, misprision, or breach of constitutional duties, and protect the People’s rights?

...

Book 1, Chapter 19, §212. In his book Dreams From my Father as well as on his web site Fight the Smears respondent Obama admitted to the fact that his father was never a US citizen, but rather a British citizen from a British colony of Kenya and based on British Nationality act respondent Obama was a British citizen at birth and a Kenyan citizen from age 2 on December 12, 1961 when Kenya became an independent nation. As such, for the reason of his allegiance to foreign nations from birth respondent Obama never qualified as a Natural Born citizen. "

Continued:
First Amended Complaint - Taitz v Obama (filed 3/22/2010)

[thecodont]

BO is giving more and more fuel to add to this fire.

[rxsid]

Indeed. At least, I would certainly think so.

[Jedidah]

I wish someone more competent than Orly Taitz would take this on.

Seems like this would be a good time for whoever has the real BC to drop it. Surely Barry0 has offended just about every possible enemy by now.

[rxsid]

Completely agree, on all points.

Problem is, currently, there is no one more competent than her willing to do this.

If/when the current state's challenges to Barrycare get shot down in court (unfortunately, remains a possibility), perhaps they (the state's Attny's General/Governor's) will themselves file a QW and/or suit in SCOTUS as having original jurisdiction.

Not holding out too much hope for that though, at this point in time.

[bgill]

Will someone who’s business is closed because of ObamaCare fines have standing?