Free Republic

Now if you want to discuss an issue that is fine. But if you want to indulge in personal attacks, i suggest you dedicate a separate thread to it.

Btw you do realize that you are sick and need professional help.

You not only obsessed over me in 30+ postings, eventhough i wasn no longer on the thread, you now are stalking me all over the board.

This is a debate i would rather not get into.

All these acts that you mentioned are sick and against basic human nature or accepted social norms.

But then we do believe in individual liberties and keeping the state out of our individual lives.

I would rather that peer and social pressure be used to condemn these issues rather than drag the state into it.

Christianity is for our own good. Every sin has a logical explaination and is there to prevent turmoil and the disintegration of the society.

But then christ himself was very tolerant of others.

Sex with a child or animals would be no different than rape, and as such extremely abusive towards and harming another life.

It just can't be allowed to take place.

Sex within the family ,not only leads to genetic abnormalities, it deeply destroys the reltionships within the basic building unit of a family, that our society is weaved out of.

Again, it can't be allowed to take place.

Sex with another person of the same sex is against basic human nature and the reproductive cyle. It is revolting and could ultimately put a strain on the society.

But what about individual liberties and how far does the state intrude into a person's personal life.

these practices have in the past been held in check more so by social taboos than state control.

i don't want to get into this debate, yet.

We need to take their offensive capabilties out, including their global aspirations with their break, rob them of the resources and then contain them with sanctions.

For kicks, you are better off with your PS2 or whatever.

Well we want to address a problem, we aren't exactly looking for kicks or death and destruction.

We want to address the problem to avoid death and destruction in the first place.

Any solution should be do it as peacefully as possible.

take their WMD facilities out to minimize loss of life.

Then encourage the ethnicities to opt for cession, much like czechoslovakia

absolutely not.

Why not just arm all foreigners in iraq with guns and ask them to go around in groups.

I would tolerate gays, because they are human and have the same rights as everyone.

it's their world as much as it is ours.

But i would never support or praise gay relationships, because it's something that is against basic human nature and simply sick.

i don't know much about the dispute with georgia,

but now that the cold war is over and russia and america share the same interests and political system, it's time for the two great powers to start working closely together.

i can't see any serious differences between the two, i don't know why they have to let extraneous issues complicate their relationship.

ridley scott has produced some excellent stuff in the past. i am sure this would be no exception.

I hope he chooses the right crusade and casts someone like russel crow for the lead christian role

I hope he extends his crackdown to all tableeghis or islamic preachers.

These people might be the communication channels for al qaeda, since they travel all over the world to preach.

In the end, the islamic world has to broken up just like the communist world and the ottoman empire before it to destroy their global aspirations.

ghaffar khan's movement consisted of a very few people, while pakhtoon fanaticism was rampant even back then.

You'd find that back in 1948, during the heydey's of ghaffar khan, kashmir was invaded by savage pakhtoon hordes. these savages are at the source of not only all recent terror in the region but also responsible for the kashmir problem.

besides if you take some time and read ancient indian history, you'd see that pakhtoons and looted and plundered india for as long as history can remember. I think the first barbarian's name was ghazni or suri or something. I read about it in some publication from the british-india library or something

if i were to carve the region up, i'd do it in the following manner.

1- For pakistan, I would first of all declare secular sind and baluchistan as independent countries.

This would rob Pakistan of all the mineral wealth and all it's sea ports.

I would then use these two independent states to isolate and squeeze the militant pakhtoon and punjabi areas for a few decades, much like libya to destroy their militant and fanatical sentiment.

this should be followed by a deporation of militant pakhtoon and other fanatic populations from moderate islamic states.


2- For iran, i would again proceed with an azeri and baluchi cession first. this would rob iran of around a fourth of its population and give us control over iranian sea traffic passing through hormuz.

This could be followed by merging of areas of iran into turkmenistan, afghanistan etc. the persians only make up 51% of the iranian population, the rest could be incorporated into other states along ethnic lines.


3- saudi arabia similarly should be carved into small states the size of qatar. saud had to unite various tribes to create saudi arabia, it can be broken up into small states the same way.

These three countries are the source of all islamic terror, political and WMD efforts.

A break up like that of former yugoslavia, would replace the islamic sentiment with a strong ethnic sentiment and rob these countries of the resources to destabilize the world.

4- whatever the divisions care should be taken not to create any states that might emphasize islamic sentiment.

5- However before we proceed with any of this, The WMD might of both iran and pakistan needs to be addressed.

india could address pakistan, while israel could address the iranian threat.

The US could then buffer israel and India from possible international repercussions.

6- Since this break up would take a while to materialize, i suggest we use the threat of this break up to force pakistan, saudi arabia and iran to crackdown on and destroy the terror they created over the years, shut down all religious schools, outlaw parties like jamiati islami or else we would break them up into small insignificant states.

since pakistan and saudi arabia created al qaeda and wahhabi terror and political movements, they'd be the most effective agents of destroying these movements. Similarly since iran created hizbollah and all shiite terror and political movement, iran would be the most effective agent for destroying all shiite terror and political movement.

we need to threaten these countries with their break up, unless they destroy the terror and political movements that they created.

7- All of this should be accompanied by a clean up within western intelligence of islamist influence, to jettison all islamist elements, to create a new cadre of western linguists and a new cadre made of western, latino and african operatives to lead teams that would use muslims only as guides. It might also be a good idea to do away with islamic intermediaries and for western operators
to run all islamic moles directly to prevent them from forming an islamic lobby.

The problem with pathans is that they always try to conquer other people. They supressed and butchered the tajiks and other minorities in afghanistan.

they were behind the kashmiri insurgency in india and most of the al qaeda, jamiati islami and other islamic terror in pakistan. they made the taliban ranks 100%.

You'd also find pathan fanatics as far away as chechenya, bosnia, albania, europe and the US itself.

THE PAKHTOONS ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS ETHNICITY COMPRISING BOTH THE MILITANT WAHHABIS AND SHIITES.

YOU RUN INTO A MILITANT WAHHABI IN THE AFGHANISTAN-PAKISTAN REGION, 90% CHANCES ARE HE'D BE A PAKHTOON. yOU RUN INTO A MILITANT SUNNI OR SHIITE IN THE REGION, HE AGAIN IS LIKELY TO BE A PAKHTOON.

pakhtoons are not only fanatical, they are also dangerously dumb.

On an IQ test, a chimp could burry a pakhtoon in dust.

pakthtoons, pakis and muslims are stone age, because they are extremely stupid.

The pakhtoons are the most barbaric, savage, uncouth and deeply fanatic people you can come across.

they were subdued by the sikhs and recently the tajiks did a fine job of keeping them subdued.

afghanistan would have been worse than iraq, if it hadnt been for the tajiks subdueing the pakhtoons.

You cannot grant independence to troublesome ethnicities like the pakhtoons or sects like the wahhabis and shiites.

You have to keep them subdued with another strong ethnicity.

cronos: The people around ghaffar khan might have been a tiny minority. Pakhtoon savage hordes invaded kashmir back in 1948. the paki army would have been crushed by the indians. It was a sea of savage pakhtoon fanatical hordes
that created the kashmir mess in the first place.

even today, you can link most of the terror in the region to mostly pakhtoon savages.

I was just wondering if that hybrid helicopter/plane ever made it into service.( The one takes off as a helicopter and then swings its wings around to fly like a cargo plane.)

special forces teams equipped with that helicopter and VSTOL harriers would make ideal units for operations in sudan.

i am not going to say anyting more on this thread.

1- just count your postings immediately preceding my first post today. Then count your posting following my first posting today.

a- You'd see that the two of your literally flooded this post, before my first reply, even though i wasn't replying.

now that is obsessive compulsive behavior.

b- In the days preceding my postings' nopardons' would come up, look the board, not find my replies and then imagine that i thought i had bested him, and he would post me again.

Now that is extremely obsessive and somewhat delusional behavior.

c- You'd see that even though you were accusing me of an obsessive behavior, you dumbos didn't realize that you were the ones flooding the board.

d- I have never seen americans so immature, so ill informed or simply so stupid.

that's why i stick to my point that you are freshly out of some third world ghetto.

If i could show you my comments section, you'd see it filled with obsessive and psychotic postings from nopardon and you.

no pardon even went on to accuse me of not replying to the thread.

that is what brought me to this thread, since they weren't any other hot issues to discuss anyway.

If you scroll back and look at your own postings, before my first posting this morning and then look at your postings following my first post.

you'd find that you literally flooded the board with your half baked obsessive psychotic postings.

all of this doesn't take rocket science, just count the postings.

Your other obsessive psychotic pal, 'nopardon', kept on coming back to the thread, looking for my postings, not finding them, obsessing over it, imagining that i thought i had bested him, and then flooding me again.

You guys are lunatics accept it.

i didnt come to a dead thread to post.

My comments section was flooded with obsessive psychotic postings from you.

eventhough, i had never discussed an issue with you, you seem to have filled up my entire comment's section.

so i just dropped in a post, you then flooded the entire thread with your postings once more.

just scroll back, count your psychotic half baked postings and then tell me who's the obsessive one on this board.