Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-carb diet may reduce diabetes risk independent of weight loss
Medical XPress ^ | June 20, 2019 | Misti Crane, The Ohio State University

Posted on 06/22/2019 9:43:14 PM PDT by ConservativeMind

A low-carb diet may have benefits for people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes even if they don't lose any weight, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that more than half of study participants no longer met the criteria for metabolic syndrome immediately following a four-week low-carb diet.

About a third of American adults have the syndrome, according to the American Heart Association.

After eating a low-carb diet, more than half the participants saw their metabolic syndrome reversed even though they were fed diets that intentionally contained enough calories to keep their weight stable.

After eating the low-carb diet, the participants had a variety of significantly improved health measures, particularly lower triglycerides and improved cholesterol readings. Despite the fact that the low-carb diet contained 2.5 times more saturated fat than the high-carb diet, it decreased saturated fat in the bloodstream and was associated with an increase in the size of cholesterol particles in the blood, which decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease, Hyde said.

The researchers also report evidence of increased fat-burning efficiency after a low-carb diet and an improvement in blood sugar. They did not see statistically significant improvements in blood pressure or insulin resistance.

Three participants no longer had metabolic syndrome after the moderate-carbohydrate diet and one no longer had the syndrome after the high-carb diet. Volek said that those results are likely explained by the fact that even these study diets—particularly the moderate-carb diet—represented a shift toward fewer carbs for study participants.

"Even a modest restriction is carbs is enough to reverse metabolic syndrome in some people, but others need to restrict even more," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: atkins; diabetes; diet; dietandcuisine; food; health; lowcarbdiet; metabolicsyndrome; southbeachdiet; type2diabetes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Low carb reverses metabolic syndrome even when not losing weight.
1 posted on 06/22/2019 9:43:14 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

DUH!


2 posted on 06/22/2019 9:47:14 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Diabetes results from too much sugar in the blood past the point of what insulin can push to the muscles to be used.
Having too much sugar in the blood turns it acidic and the acidic blood breaks down cellular walks, which is why diabetics have a harder time clotting from bleeding and are more open to infection.

Basically, you can either delay diabetes or even reverse it by reducing your carbohydrates if you’re no longer as physically active as you once we’re.


3 posted on 06/22/2019 9:54:51 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I read the study. The average low carb diet in the study was a 3000 calories per day diet with 45.5 g of carbs.

The amount of carbs varied from person to person because they wanted to keep their weight constant for the study. Some persons took more calories to do that and some less. So carbs were kept at 6% of total calorie intake. 6% of the average 3000 calorie value is how I got the numbers above.


4 posted on 06/22/2019 10:23:30 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
The amount of carbs varied from person to person because they wanted to keep their weight constant for the study. Some persons took more calories to do that and some less. So carbs were kept at 6% of total calorie intake. 6% of the average 3000 calorie value is how I got the numbers above.

I also reviewed it. I wish they would have taken in account the basal metabolic rate (BMR). They should have also reviewed the patients muscle, fat, and bone mass with bio-impedance analysis or a DEXA scan. A non-DEXA test would have been very economical and rapid at both the beginning of the testing and endpoint.

One of the effects of metabolic syndrome is sarcopenia (muscle loss). Reducing insulin resistance may result in the metabolic reversal of this symptom.

If a high caloric and low carb (45.5 is questionable as low) and muscle loss reverses (BMR stable or increasing) while maintaining body fat they would have provided more significant findings with their study. They missed a chance to dig deeper into the syndrome.

Shame.
5 posted on 06/22/2019 10:51:32 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Another study can do that. These things are more effective when they are focused.


6 posted on 06/22/2019 11:32:22 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mlo

My numbers improved and remain stable when I cut out the amount of meals I had every day. I was snacking constantly. Started doing just two meals a day no snacks between meals numbers came way down and were made steady. Every meal or snack introduces more insulin into the system. Exercising but an empty stomach really helped my triglycerides. I heard one guy say u will live as long as your pancreas will let you. Give it a rest.


7 posted on 06/23/2019 3:16:28 AM PDT by magua (It's not racism, it's just that thisBecause itÂ’s being reported that a lot of this started in 2015.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Carbohydrates are broken down into sugars.
Too much sugar over stresses insulin, which over time can cause diabetes.
Eliminating carbs means eliminating sugar, which lets the insulin settle down, and lets the body heal from diabetes.

Yes...DUH!


8 posted on 06/23/2019 4:07:57 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

I think that is expecting a lot in such a short period of time.


9 posted on 06/23/2019 4:12:00 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

“Low-carb diet may reduce diabetes risk independent of weight loss”

IS THE SKY BLUE?

Look, pretty much every informed American now understands the going low-carb is healthy, and the lower the better (although going below 10 grams a day might be a bit too much).

Oh, yea, that is everyone EXCEPT the medical profession. They, pretty much, think you’re a nutcase if you tell them that you’re severely limiting carbs.


10 posted on 06/23/2019 4:18:24 AM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

My wife has cancer (and is doing very well, thank you). I told her doctors we were eating very low carb, to deprive the cancer of glucose. Some of them objected, saying “But your brain runs on glucose.”

I was on the phone with one of them when she said that. I kind of lost it and said “Are you aware of the 1967 study by George Cahill, where he fasted volunteers for 40 days and determined the brain was running on 67% ketones?”. There was silence on the phone for several seconds, then she said “I have to get back to work.”

And there’s more. Your body makes about 80g of glucose per day, even in extended fasts or starvation.

We are doing hyperbaric oxygen therapy. It’s not FDA approved to treat cancer, so it’s out of pocket, but not unreasonable. About $100 per 90 minute session.

I made a video of it last week: (Shirley HBOT):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtC-QEbUq88


11 posted on 06/23/2019 4:47:38 AM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

Thank you for the video. I had the same conversation with our oncologist and she didn’t want to hear it also. Glucose is not the problem she said. And she cut me right off.


12 posted on 06/23/2019 5:47:52 AM PDT by magua (It's not racism, it's just that thisBecause itÂ’s being reported that a lot of this started in 2015.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

A relative of mine has gone on a special diet, medically monitored & adjusted (but not distinctly “low carb”), for several months now. Wit that diet she has gone from diabetic to pre-diabetic, off her previous diabetic meds and her numbers continue to improve.

It is not cheap. The medical part includes extensive and repeated blood tests that are part of tailoring and adjusting her diet specifically for her. Yes, along with the program of what she can eat has been adherence to restrictions on things she cannot eat (or drink). Knowing her history I know many of the “must nots” are part of her improvement. She has lost some weight but her blood-sugar improvement has been the greatest change.


13 posted on 06/23/2019 5:54:19 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Fiber Advance and Fiber Well Fit will do the job if taken after every meal.


14 posted on 06/23/2019 6:00:34 AM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magua

Ask her why they give glucose with radioactive tracer before a PET scan.

Because cancer eats glucose. DUH. Cancer has 18 times more insulin receptors than normal cells. Spike insulin with carbs and you are telling the cancer “get ready, food is coming, time to grow.”


15 posted on 06/23/2019 6:08:46 AM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

One thing that those with diabetes can do is have entire days where they don’t take carbs at all.

Just meat and vegetables.


16 posted on 06/23/2019 6:09:10 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

May? No significant sugar or carb intake, no source of blood sugar to spike. Easily (in many or most cases) controlled with pills instead of insulin.


17 posted on 06/23/2019 6:11:06 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Exactly.


18 posted on 06/23/2019 6:11:35 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh

Ping


19 posted on 06/23/2019 6:16:42 AM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Look, pretty much every informed American now understands the going low-carb is healthy, and the lower the better

Not true at all. I recommend you read “The Starch Solution” by Dr John McDougall, The End of Diabetes” by Dr. Joel Fuhrman, and watch “ What the Health” on Nexflix.

The majority of your calories should come from whole food carbs. The healthiest diet is low-fat, low protein, high carb and high starch.

20 posted on 06/23/2019 6:25:43 AM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson