Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BILL MAHER WARNS DEMOCRATS: HILLARY WILL TAKE YOU OVER A CLIFF IN '08 (video clip)
Hardball | 2.17.06 | Mia T

Posted on 02/17/2006 8:01:45 PM PST by Mia T

BILL MAHER WARNS DEMOCRATS:
HILLARY WILL TAKE YOU OVER A CLIFF IN '08



First of all, she will never win the presidency. The people who are worrying about that should stop worrying. She will never be elected president of this country. The democrats should buddy up to that concept before they walk over the cliff with her in 2008.

Bill Maher
Hardball with Chris Matthews
February 14, 2006



'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?

by Mia T, 02.02.06



The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes.

The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and should-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.


Mia T, 10.27.05
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)



unning vicariously, as we have argued, has its risks.

What was supposed to be Hollywood propaganda to make a hillary presidency marginally palatable has instead become a parable about missus clinton's own dystopian future.

ABC announced the other day that it is pulling "Commander-in-Chief" off the air "until spring." Missus clinton's proxy presidency, you see, has been in a ratings free fall ever since "American Idol" took it on.

In a perverse life-mirrors-art moment, support for the real-life missus clinton's presidency has plummeted, too. This even sans Rudy, her real-life "American Idol" opponent.

'Ars artia gratis.' Please!

Samuel Goldwyn must be turning over in his grave....


 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)



January 9, 2006
Reviewer: miat22 (Mia T)


CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND

... to borrow a phrase, perversely, from a Spielberg flick about benign intelligence.

Munich -- Spielberg fantasy wrapped in sober documentary -- with its false premises, phony pieties and outright lies, is a verisimilitudinous contrivance that is pernicious, especially now, especially here, especially if we understand Spielberg's real motivation.

Truth matters not at all to Spielberg, and courage matters even less. To advance his fallacious argument, he has Golda Meir speak words she never said, never would have said and, obviously, cannot now disavow. Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward.

Munich is less about Meir avenging the Munich massacre than it is about Bush waging the War on Terror. The historical (Munich) allusion is key to understanding Spielberg.

The core of his anti-war argument:
By fighting back, we become our enemy. Ironically, with Munich, the same can now be said of Spielberg.

Is Spielberg humanizing the terrorist really any different from Riefenstahl humanizing Hitler? If anything, Spielberg is more contemptible. Whereas Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Spielberg is self-actuated and aware.

Hollywood is DreamWorks, fantastical and unthinking and solipsistic by definition.

To mitigate its danger, people capable of critical thinking must take on Hollywood... and must do so in Hollywood venues.

The printed word, sad to say, no longer carries the day.



Was this review helpful to you?
VOTE
HERE

My New York Times Review of Munich

 


ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
THE ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT

by Chris Matthews, Anne Kornblut + Dana Milbank

(with annotations by Mia T), 01.26.06



EXCERPT:

This is HARDBALL on MSNBC.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[NOTE: My comments in blue.]

MATTHEWS:  We're back with Anne Kornblut of "The New York Times" and Dana Milbank of "The Washington Post."  Let's talk about Gotham's candidates for president.

First, Rudolph Giuliani, the pro-choice, pro-gay rights, former mayor spent today, or the day in Orlando speaking to a conference of Evangelicals. 

Dana, he's up to it, isn't he?  This is below the radar.  This is Rudy campaigning for president in the south. 

MILBANK:  This is about as convincing as Jerry Falwell at the gay pride parade. 

MATTHEWS:  You don't buy this? 

MILBANK:  Well, he can try to do it.  But, look, he faces an awful uphill battle in winning over the typical Republican voter in a primary.  Now, if the election was fought on national security, he is fine.  But he's never going to convince them that he is one of them, that he is a religious conservative. 

KORNBLUT:  Right and not only that, but he's going to be in a death struggle with John McCain for the exact same constituency. 

MATTHEWS:  Let me tell you something.  I'll say it here a thousand time.  Watch Rudolph Giuliani.  Watch him.  Security is the issue in this country.  Whoever is the next president is going to be seen as more on the ball than even this president on security and terrorism.  This country is not going sort on terrorism.  We are going to get smarter on it is my hunch.

And Rudy is the guy to do it.  And he can be an SOB in many ways.  But this country may really want an SOB, a really tough cop as the next president.  So watch Rudy, I'm saying it.


Now here is Hillary Clinton, that other New Yorker in the subway series.  A new Gallup poll just came out.  "USA TODAY" Gallup poll, it shows that 16 percent say that they'll definitely vote for Hillary right now, 32 percent say they might vote for her. 

But here's the dagger in the back.  Fifty-one percent say they would definitely not vote for Hillary Clinton already the campaign hasn't begun. 

KORNBLUT:  I mean, this is exactly what Democrats are worried about is that already people have made up their minds.  I would argue, I guess, that it is awfully early.  We all know how early it is to be talking about this. 

MATTHEWS:  Definitely. 

KORNBLUT:  Definitely?  What does definitely mean?  [Definitely means DEFINITELY.] You know, you would have to see how is the question exactly phrased, all that stuff.  It is early. [Actually Anne, it is late. In fact, it is too late. The country knows exactly who this woman is, Anne.]

MATTHEWS:  But there's lot of tooth behind that.  If somebody tells a pollster, I've already made up my mind definitely. 

KORNBLUT:  And, look, I know more Democrats who believe this though than Republicans.  A lot of Republicans say that this is a deceptive number, that once she gets out there with all of her money running against who, Giuliani or McCain, the numbers may not be that weak.  [She has 100% name recognition, Anne. You can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear. Even when the sow isn't hillary.]

MATTHEWS:  How much of that is don't throw me in that briar patch, Dana?  We're so afraid of Hillary.  Please don't run her against us.  She'll kill us. 

MILBANK:  Anne is right that these polls are completely useless because you don't know what the alternative is.  But the fact is that she...  [Earth to Dana: 51% would vote for their mother-in-law before they would vote for HER.]

MATTHEWS:  OK.  McCain against Hillary.  Who wins? 

 

MILBANK:  Well, that's fine.  If you can tell me that's how it is going to turn out.  But we don't know. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, let me ask you about these definite numbers in a poll.  Do you believe the definite?  Do you believe somebody right in 2006 knows how they are going to vote in 2008?

MILBANK:  I think they definitely think that's what they are going to do right now, but they have no idea what they are going to be doing in a couple years.  And Hillary is going to have the opposite problem of Rudy.  And that is she's absolutely fine with her base if she decides to run.  But she is seemingly incapable of crossing over. 

MATTHEWS:  The poll was taken over the week right through Sunday, the Gallup poll.  And the Gallup poll is, of course, the most prestigious poll there is right now and has been for years. 

Dana, do you think she's paying the price for her plantation remark last week? 

MILBANK:  Probably not.  Because, once again, plays very well the base.  The people who were objecting to it were never going to support her in the first case.  And I really think the only thing that this is right now is do people recognize her name.  [What is it you don't understand, here? We recognize her name, yes. And we abhor the person attached to that name. Get it?]

KORNBLUT:  And I would add to that.  It's 51 percent say definitely not.  Remember the margin that's we've been talking about in the last few presidential races, 51 percent is terrible, but all she would have to do is bump it by a few numbers, a few percentage points and be OK.  [I can see why Pinch hired you, Anne. Your Alice-in-Wonderland illogic is quintessential New York Times. With 100% name recognition and roughly 10% corruption recognition (thanks in no small measure to your rag), missus clinton has only one way to go. And it isn't up.]

... Anyway, thank you Anne Kornblut of "The New York Times," Dana Milbank of "The Washington Post." 

Join us again tomorrow night at 5:00 and 7:00 Eastern for more HARDBALL.  Right now it is time for "THE ABRAM'S REPORT" with Dan.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

Copy: Content and programming copyright 2006 MSNBC.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS
January 25, 2006


December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?


IS REUTERS SENDING A MESSAGE ABOUT A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY?


HILLARY'S EXPOSED LEFT FLANK 'SCARES THE HORSES' (VIDEO)
(MISSUS CLINTON SUPPORTS ALITO FILIBUSTER)


ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
THE ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT



CLINTON 'CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'


SEE VIDEO: "HILLARY IS 'DOOMED'" (more 'plantation' fallout)


GONE WITH THE WIND
(miss hillary's 'plantation' blunder)


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.


IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)



WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT


HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK


ROCKEFELLER SEDITION: WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS?


THE ABSURDITY OF A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY


CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS:
Justice Undone in the clinton White House


clintonCORRUPTION: the more things change. . . .


Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000


THE 'BOARD,' BEFUDDLED POLITICS OF JOHN KERRY RETURNS
CALLS FOR ALITO FILIBUSTER FROM 'SKI SLOPES'



IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008election; 2016election; bill; billmaher; chrismatthews; clinton; dud; election2008; election2016; hardball; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; loser; matthews; miatpsycho; missusclinton; mrsbillclinton; nosupport; repetitive; terror; terrorism; toomanygraphics; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: wally-balls; RayChuang88
The assumption has always been that everything is already known about clinton corruption. I suspect we've only seen the tip of the iceberg.

And many people know very little about what is already known. For example, many people don't have a clue about the clintons' rape of Juanita Broaddrick.

Missus clinton has 100% name recognition and at most 10% corruption recognition, which means her support has only one way to go. And it isn't up.











141 posted on 02/18/2006 3:59:13 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Let's turn your questions around, jla. You seem to know a lot about Allen and Pence. What, specifically, makes them qualified?

Pence and Allen, as incumbent elected representatives to the United States Congress, can only be judged by how they've supported the President and his initiatives regarding the WOT. Both men pass the grade magnificently as each has adamantly and persistently supported GWB's agenda as it pertains to the WOT.Both men have given every indication that they would continue on in like manner.
Aside from the WOT a President's job entails much more. As important as the former is, it's success could very well be hampered by an economic downturn along with further moral erosion in this country.
Pence and Allen are proven social and economic conservatives who don't belittle Judeo-Christian values. Those very same values this nation was founded upon.
Pence and Allen also would'nt seek to unconstitutionally disarm law-abiding citizens, nor would they support the denigration of the institute of marriage.

I'm disappointed by your misuse of that photo. (Ad hominem in drag is still ad hominem.)

If the high-heel fits...
And if you're disappointed now, you're in for a lot more if Giuliani declares his intention to run in '08. That picture will be ubiquitously published across this country.
And a point of clarification: If I had Photoshopped the image then your charge of "ad hominem" would be justified. Since it is an actual image your charge is invalid.

If post-9/11 New York City is a microcosm of post-9/11 America, (and it is) then how can you say he hasn't demonstrated his competence to be POTUS during these perilous times?

Then why not run Bloomberg? NYC hasn't been attacked since he's been mayor.

142 posted on 02/18/2006 4:08:10 PM PST by jla (Urge Mike Pence to run for POTUS in '08: www.house.gov/formpence/IMA/contact.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

It's always been the fear of Hillary becoming president someday that has kept people from investigating and/or revealing the depth of their corruption. The moment it becomes apparent that these felons will never soil (pardon the pun) the oval office again, and the fear of retribution (aka death) is eliminated, the real story will finally be told


143 posted on 02/18/2006 4:13:35 PM PST by wally-balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia, great job on tracking this evil witch..


144 posted on 02/18/2006 4:15:42 PM PST by biff0101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Mike Pence's position on homeland security can be found here, along with links to other issues important for any serious contender of the Presidency.

You can learn more about Senator Allen here.

Unfortunately no data, pertaining to national issues, on Rudy Giuliani is available.

145 posted on 02/18/2006 4:28:43 PM PST by jla (Urge Mike Pence to run for POTUS in '08: www.house.gov/formpence/IMA/contact.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Collier
Boy, was I wrong. The press protected her very large behind.

Yup, and they're still doing so, as you no doubt know.

MM

146 posted on 02/18/2006 6:12:14 PM PST by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
The assumption has always been that everything is already known about clinton corruption. I suspect we've only seen the tip of the iceberg.

With the modern public Internet, I think we're going to soon REALLY find out about the Whitewater fiasco, what REALLY happened at the Rose Law Firm, explain the mysterious deaths of Vince Foster and Ron Brown, explain all that womanizing by former President Clinton, prove or disprove once and for all rumors that Senator Clinton has lesbian tendencies, and who knows what other skeletons in the closet we have yet to learn about.

Like I said earlier, Senator Clinton won't know what hit her.

147 posted on 02/18/2006 6:35:49 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: jla
And if you're disappointed now, you're in for a lot more if Giuliani declares his intention to run in '08. That picture will be ubiquitously published across this country.

And a point of clarification: If I had Photoshopped the image then your charge of "ad hominem" would be justified. Since it is an actual image your charge is invalid.

My little pun notwithstanding, photoshopping isn't the only way to misrepresent a photo. Not supplying the context or implying a false context are others. I don't know what you were trying to prove with that photo--(ok, perhaps I do)--but Rudy put on the lipstick and lace for charity.

Mr. Giuliani's gender-bending performance earlier this month at a charity dinner has won him accolades from voters, who judged his spoof of Marilyn Monroe a hit, a poll showed yesterday.

The former prosecutor stunned the audience at the annual Inner Circle show March 1 when he appeared on stage in a blonde bouffant wig, pancake makeup and bosomy pink gown.

He did a reprise of Ms. Monroe's famous, breathy serenade to John F. Kennedy, "Happy birthday, Mr. President" and cavorted with actress Julie Andrews and other cast members of the Broadway musical "Victor/Victoria," which is about a woman masquerading as a man masquerading as a woman.

 

If post-9/11 New York City is a microcosm of post-9/11 America, (and it is) then how can you say he hasn't demonstrated his competence to be POTUS during these perilous times?--me

Then why not run Bloomberg? NYC hasn't been attacked since he's been mayor.--you

You know that parameter is hardly sufficient. That said, Bloomberg would probably make a better president than most

An interesting take on Giuliani


148 posted on 02/18/2006 7:02:26 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations

Your tagline is the best reason not to vote for Giuliani...

If Giuliani was serious about knocking Hitlery out of the box he would take her out of the Senate first.

He will only get in it (or made to appear so by the leftists in the media) to help Hitlery.

Machiavellian tactics like the last New York race for Hitlery's senate seat.

149 posted on 02/18/2006 7:21:02 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jla

If Giuliani was serious about knocking Hitlery out of the box he would take her out of the Senate first.

He will only get in it (or made to appear so by the leftists in the media) to help Hitlery.

Machiavellian tactics like the last New York race for Hitlery's senate seat.

Never know when another bout of colon cancer will kill your run for office

“Global character,” persuasive speaker??? I sure as hell ain't impressed...

We need a man of physical stature as president... Giuliani don't cut it in that department... skinny, bald, glasses, weak and sickly...

Now, George Allen fits the bill and so does Jeb Bush. Either one of those fellas look good in a Stetson and pointy boots. (Condoleeza looks good in spike heeled boots and has a steely glare.)

War on Terror??? It ain't gonna be won in a courtroom by skinny, tassle shoed, pencil neck lawyers...


150 posted on 02/18/2006 7:41:40 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; jla
We need a man of physical stature as president... Giuliani don't cut it in that department... skinny, bald, glasses, weak and sickly...

Now, George Allen fits the bill and so does Jeb Bush. Either one of those fellas look good in a Stetson and pointy boots. (Condoleeza looks good in spike heeled boots and has a steely glare.)

War on Terror??? It ain't gonna be won in a courtroom by skinny, tassle shoed, pencil neck lawyers...

 

Weaponized garments and a warrior affect as requirements work for me. ;)
(Of course, that just about eliminates all presidents past, present and wannabe.)

151 posted on 02/18/2006 8:02:57 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: biff0101

thx ;)


152 posted on 02/18/2006 8:30:10 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

As has always been the case, month after month, year after year -another superb article by you Mia T. Thank you.


153 posted on 02/18/2006 10:42:18 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

Thank you, Sic Luceat Lux. :)


154 posted on 02/19/2006 3:46:56 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


155 posted on 02/19/2006 8:07:05 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Weaponized garments and a warrior affect as requirements work for me... (Of course, that just about eliminates all presidents past, present and wannabe.)

Speaking of personal affectations and facades, I'd say a "global character" would be a good example.
The requirement that works for me is one who has read, and comprehends, our Constitution. Guiliani does not meet this condition.

Question: Do you believe Giuliani would seek the Presidency out of a sincere wish, stemming from patriotism and love for America, to serve our nation or because he's attracted to the power and prestige of the office?

156 posted on 02/19/2006 8:55:26 AM PST by jla (Urge Mike Pence to run for POTUS in '08: www.house.gov/formpence/IMA/contact.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
"We WANT the RATS to nominate someone with a 51% disapproval rating!"

Maybe now is the time for us to register as Demos so we can ..ahem.. affect the nomination process.

157 posted on 02/19/2006 9:02:14 AM PST by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; jla

We need a man of physical stature as president... Giuliani don't cut it in that department... skinny, bald, glasses, weak and sickly...

Now, George Allen fits the bill and so does Jeb Bush. Either one of those fellas look good in a Stetson and pointy boots. (Condoleeza looks good in spike heeled boots and has a steely glare.)

War on Terror??? It ain't gonna be won in a courtroom by skinny, tassle shoed, pencil neck lawyers...

--Sir Francis Dashwood

 

PARTY OF LINCOLN AND THE WAR ON TERROR
2.18.06 | Mia T



READ MORE


158 posted on 02/20/2006 4:38:30 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Lincoln was tall, rigorously strong, a rail splitter and was an accomplished fist fighter...

Giuliani was none of those. Nice try...
159 posted on 02/20/2006 7:59:50 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: jla

Good intentions... and a philosophy consistent with winning the wot... are necessary characteristics, but they are not sufficient.

The GOP candidate in '08 must, in my view, have a proven record of accomplishment in that area. The era of the Placebo President is over.

Perhaps more important, he (and I believe the winning candidate will be a 'he')* must (obviously) have the ability to win the election. And I'm not sure Allen or Pence does.




*
 

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

 

G. K. Chesterton

 

 

 

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


160 posted on 02/20/2006 8:10:18 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson