Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 4/14/2008
InTrade ^ | Monday, April 14, 2008 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 04/14/2008 5:46:30 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008election; election; electionpresident; elections; electoral; electoralvotes; intrade; mccain; presidential; projected; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Intrade.com is a futures market in which people bet on the outcomes of various things such as the results of elections.

According to the current trading prices of the futures contracts, an estimate can be found of what traders are betting will be the outcome of 2008 Presidential Election.

If the traders are correct, John McCain would receive 245 Electoral Votes and the Democratic Presidential candidate would receive 293 Electoral Votes.

If the weighted probabilities of John McCain winning in the states are added up, and then divided by 538, and multiplied by 100, then John McCain should get 249.24 Electoral Votes.

270 Electoral Votes are needed to win the Presidency.

Opinions and commentary are welcome.

1 posted on 04/14/2008 5:49:06 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Previous projections:

2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 4/7/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/31/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/24/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/17/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/10/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 3/3/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/25/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/18/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/11/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/4/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/28/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/21/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/14/2008
2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/7/2008

2 posted on 04/14/2008 5:49:37 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


3 posted on 04/14/2008 5:50:02 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut; amigatec; angkor; annyokie; beckysueb; BlessedByLiberty; bluefish; Bogeygolfer; ...


If you want on (or off) of the weekly InTrade Projected Presidential Electoral Vote ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail.


4 posted on 04/14/2008 5:50:47 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Its still a long way towards November. The generic Democrat always leads in the polls up to the convention.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 04/14/2008 5:55:34 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

I don’t think McCain’s chances in Ohio are nearly that bad.


6 posted on 04/14/2008 6:05:10 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

I agree! If it is Obama vs McCain McCain wins.


7 posted on 04/14/2008 6:06:55 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

Now that they got Hillary back drinking and puking McCain could very well win in an overwhelming landslide of historic proportions.


8 posted on 04/14/2008 6:30:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Bogus.

It gives Ohio to the Dems, which will be very unlikely if Hussein Obama gets the nod.

It ignores the fact that Michigan is in play with McCain.

It ignores the fact that Wisconsin and New Mexico are always close, and if fraud can be controlled in Milwaukee then Wisconsin goes Republican.

Even Pennsylvania is in play if Hussein Obama gets the nod because while the state is majority Democratic, they will not vote for a black Democrat. Lots of Reagan Democrats who love the red white and blue.


9 posted on 04/14/2008 6:57:45 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
This is getting to be ridiculous. These numbers have hardly moved, in spite of all the negative things that have come out against the ‘Rat candidates. Hillary's sniper fire gaffe and the crazy lie Bubba came up with to cover it. Obama’s Rev. Wright fiasco and now his “bitter people” snub of ordinary folks in flyover country. And this ‘poll’ says none of that has changed the dynamic? I find that hard to believe.
10 posted on 04/14/2008 6:58:47 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I agree...McInsane could very well be the first modern President to win a landslide, but still be immensely unpopular.

The other two Nimrods running for the office are so disdainful, they make McLame attractive. At least that is how I see the situation.


11 posted on 04/14/2008 7:02:25 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Some inexorable momentum is building here.

If Nader runs, some blue states will go red.

All we need is OH or PA, and say, CO.


12 posted on 04/14/2008 7:06:07 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
McInsane could very well be the first modern President to win a landslide, but still be immensely unpopular.

The only thing comparable to this is Nixon in 1972.

13 posted on 04/14/2008 7:08:57 PM PDT by Marathoner (Don't blame me, I voted for Duncan Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Funny, I multiplied the electoral votes by the % chance of winning and came up with 280/McCain and 258/dem.


14 posted on 04/14/2008 7:16:20 PM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Intrade or someone is going to make a lot of money on the many Demo betting suckers if they think the D candidate is going to win.
15 posted on 04/14/2008 7:21:55 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

mcczin takes Ohio and competes in PA.


16 posted on 04/14/2008 7:34:00 PM PDT by Soliton (McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Absolutely!

All of the Democrat predictions are based on everyone thinking that their candidate will be the nominee.


17 posted on 04/14/2008 7:42:26 PM PDT by SmithL (Reject Obama's Half-Vast Wright-Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

I have never considered Intrade as a viable source of information or polling. If you look at Rasmussen polling or Gallup, Ohio goes to Mac and Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire are competitive.


18 posted on 04/14/2008 8:08:43 PM PDT by MNReaganite (Bobby Jindal for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera
“These numbers have hardly moved, in spite of all the negative things that have come out against the ‘Rat candidates.”

That does not matter. The dems from highly educated to the poorest all drink the same kool-aid, no, take it intravenously. 24hrs a day.

The dem candidate could shoot a baby on the steps of a church and they would say it is Bush's fault.

It is who they are.

19 posted on 04/14/2008 8:34:43 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner
The only thing comparable to this is Nixon in 1972.

And look what happened to him.

20 posted on 04/15/2008 10:46:43 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson